How JustAnswer Works:

  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.

Ask DXJ Writer Your Own Question

DXJ Writer
DXJ Writer, Master's Degree
Category: Writing Homework
Satisfied Customers: 2045
Experience:  Research writer, educator, tutor with 20+ years experience.
50366526
Type Your Writing Homework Question Here...
DXJ Writer is online now
A new question is answered every 9 seconds

fOR DXJ WRITER:· Complete the blank Ethical Dilemma

Resolved Question:

fOR DXJ WRITER: · Complete the blank Ethical Dilemma Worksheet located in the course materials forum. · Use the Corrections Scenario, located on the student website. · Review the Ethical Dilemma Worksheet sample located on your student website and posted to the course materials forum. · Use the blank Ethical Dilemma Worksheet located in the course materials forum. Do not use the one located on your student web site. BELOW IS THE CORRECTIONS SCENARIO: University of Phoenix Material Corrections Scenario Ethical Issue: Corrections The husband eventually is convicted of driving while under the influence following a jury trial. It turns out to be his third conviction. A judge orders that a presentence investigation report be prepared. In the course of the investigation, the probation officer discovers that the husband had served in the U.S. military in Somalia. His military records indicate that while there, his duties involved collecting the dead and the injured to be taken to the hospital. In the course of this assignment, he was captured by enemy soldiers and placed into a black metal box the size of a coffin where he remained for the better part of 6 weeks. Medical and psychiatric records confirm that the husband suffers from post-traumatic stress disorder and has regressed to the level of a 10-year-old because of his imprisonment in Somalia. In the opinion of his treating psychiatrists, any prolonged confinement, even for a few hours, could cause even further regression and could trigger explosive outbursts and traumatic flashbacks. Although the sentencing range for this offense could fall anywhere between zero to 365 days in jail, the standard sentence for a third time offense usually begins at a minimum of 90 days in custody. His prior convictions occurred before his military service in Somalia and he served a total of 60 days custody on those, without incident. What should the probation officer recommend?


 


BELOW IS THE ETHICAL WORKSHEET EXAMPLE:


 



University of Phoenix Material



 


Ethical Worksheet Sample


 


Incident Review


 



















































  1. What is the ethical issue or problem? Identify the issue succinctly.


The moral agent is a criminal defense attorney. The attorney knows of another criminal defense attorney who is an alcoholic and ignores his client obligations. What should the moral agent do?



  1. What are the most important facts? Which facts have the most bearing on the ethical decision presented? Include any important potential economic, social, or political pressures, and exclude inconsequential facts.


The attorney often appears in court intoxicated. He ignores his cases and does not file appropriate motions before deadlines expire. His clients, who are court-appointed, usually end up with convictions and heavy sentences due to his incompetence. In trial, he is unprepared and unprofessional. Defendants have complained. Defense attorneys, prosecutors, and judges are aware of his incompetence and have done nothing. The attorney’s disbarment would likely cause drastic economic consequences for the attorney. If the moral agent is responsible for his disbarment, the moral agent may face the social stigma and pressure of being labeled a snitch. With emphasis on stiffer penalties for defendants, there is political pressure to ignore the situation, as only alleged criminals are affected by his incompetence.



  1. Identify each claimant (key actor) who has an interest in the outcome of this ethical issue. From the perspective of the moral agent—the individual contemplating an ethical course of action—what obligation is owed to the claimant? Why?


Claimant


(key actor)



Obligation


(owed to the claimant)



Perspective (What does the claimant hope will happen?)



Incompetent attorney



Fidelity, beneficence



The attorney would prefer that the moral agent ignore the situation and do nothing.



Clients



Beneficence, non-injury



The clients would prefer that the moral agent help them obtain new counsel or that the attorney's incompetence was corrected. 



Other criminal defense attorneys



Fidelity



Good defense attorneys would prefer that the incompetent attorney's behavior was corrected or that he be prevented from practicing criminal defense. Marginal defense attorneys might prefer that the moral agent does nothing, lest their own actions be called into question. 



Prosecutors, judges, and bailiffs



Beneficence, non-injury



Bailiffs would prefer not to have to accommodate his unpreparedness and intoxication in the courtroom. Prosecutors and judges may prefer that the moral agent does nothing, as a more competent attorney may make their job more difficult with motions and objections. Some prosecutors and judges may prefer that the incompetent attorney's behavior was corrected or that he was prevented from practicing to avoid reversals on appeals due to his incompetence.



Society



Justice



The advocates of law and order may prefer that the moral agent does nothing, as criminals will receive harsher sentences as a result and the process will be more streamlined.  Advocates of individual rights would prefer that the incompetent attorney's behavior was corrected or that he was prevented from practicing law.



 


Evaluating Alternatives


 













































  1. What are two alternatives for the scenario? One alternative can be a wild card that you ordinarily may not consider because of potential implications. Both should be within free will and control of the same moral agent.


Alternative A



Alternative B



Talk to the attorney and offer to help him with his cases while he seeks treatment for alcoholism.



File an official report with the agency that is responsible for appointing cases to him.



  1. Respond to the following questions based on your developed alternatives.


 



Alternative A



Alternative B



What are the best- and worst-case scenarios if you choose this alternative?



Best case: The incompetent attorney accepts the generous offer, addresses his drinking problem, changes his behavior, and thereafter represents his clients effectively.  


 


Worst case: The attorney rejects the offer, and his incompetent behavior continues.



Best case: His behavior is corrected, or he is removed from the appointment panel. 


 


Worst case: Little action is taken by the agency and the behavior continues. The moral agent is labeled a snitch.



Will anyone be harmed if this alternative is chosen? If so, how will they be harmed? Consider families and derivative effects.



The moral agent may be harmed by the financial consequences of agreeing to help the incompetent attorney if the moral agent is not provided with monetary compensation for the work performed. The moral agent may be harmed by potential backlash if the offer is rejected and if the agent encounters the incompetent attorney in future professional dealings.  



The attorney may be harmed if removed from the panel and he does not have other opportunities to generate revenue. If he has a family, the family could be harmed as a result of the loss of income. The moral agent's reputation may be harmed by the negative label.  The panel may be harmed by the loss of one of its attorneys.


 



Would honoring any idea or value—such as personal, professional, or religious—make the alternative invalid?



Perhaps family values would be compromised if the time constraints from assisting the attorney result in the moral agent's decreased ability to take care of family obligations, including spending time with them.



The value of loyalty to fellow criminal defense attorneys is called into question.



Are there any rules, laws, or principles that support the alternative? Are there rules, laws, or principles that make the alternative invalid? State the rule or principle and indicate if it invalidates or supports the alternative.



Standard 4-1.2(d) states:  The defense counsel should seek to reform and improve the administration of criminal justice. When inadequacies or injustices in the substantive or procedural law come to the defense counsel's attention, he or she should stimulate efforts for remedial action. 


 


This ethical rule supports the alternative.



Standard 4-1.2(d) states:  The defense counsel should seek to reform and improve the administration of criminal justice. When inadequacies or injustices in the substantive or procedural law come to the defense counsel's attention, he or she should stimulate efforts for remedial action. 


 


This ethical rule supports the alternative.



 


Applying Ethical Guidelines
































































6.   Consider each ethical guideline and explain whether it would support or reject your alternative.



Guidelines based on the action itself



Alternative A



Alternative B



Should this alternative become a rule or policy that everyone in this situation should follow in similar situations in the future? (Kant)



No



Yes



Does this alternative result in using any person as a means to an end without consideration for his or her basic integrity? (Kant)



No



No



Is the intent of this action free from vested interest or ulterior motive? (Kant’s good will)



Yes



Yes



Does this alternative demonstrate a genuine concern for others affected by the decision, and is the moral agency responding to a perceived need?



Yes: concern for others and responding to a perceived need are implicated



Yes: concern for others and responding to a perceived need are implicated



Guidelines based on consequences



Alternative A



Alternative B



Is the good brought about by this alternative outweighed by the potential harm that might be done to others? (Mill’s harm principle)



Possibly



No



Is any harm brought about by anyone other than the moral agent? (causal harm)



No



Yes: the decision of panel



Will anyone be harmed who can be said to be defenseless? (paternalism)



Maybe: the moral agent's family



Maybe: incompetent attorney's family



To what degree is this alternative based on the moral agent’s own best interest? (ethical egoism)



Not based on the moral agent's own interests; based on the best interests of the state bar association



Not based on the moral agent's own interests; based on the best interests of the state bar association



Which alternative will generate the greatest benefit—or the least amount of harm—for the greatest number of people? Select only one alternative. (utilitarianism)



 



Alternative B will generate the greatest benefit.



 


Ethical Decision Making


 












  1. Choose to proceed with either Alternative A or Alternative B and explain the reasons for your decision.


I recommend that the moral agent report this conduct to the appointment panel. This would help correct his behavior, which affects his appointed cases and those who retain him. These people would have civil recourse and the ability to hire another attorney. It would not necessitate extra work hours for the moral agent, which may negatively affect the moral agent's family. If the behavior continues, then the moral agent could follow up by reporting the behavior to the state bar association. The label of snitch might be possible to avoid, especially if the moral agent's name is XXXXX XXXXX during the disciplinary proceedings.  If it is not possible to avoid, any negative consequences from this label would be offset by those who appreciated and respected the moral agent's actions.



BELOW IS THE BLANK WORKSHEET:


 



University of Phoenix Material



Ethical Dilemma Worksheet & Rubric


 


CJA/324 Ethics in Criminal Justice


 


Incident Review


Week _______


Student Name: ________________________________  


 






























































  1. What is the ethical issue or problem? Identify the issue succinctly. (15 points)


Points


Earned



 


 


 


 


 



 



  1. What are the most important facts? Which facts have the most bearing on the ethical decision presented? Include any important potential economic, social, or political pressures, and exclude inconsequential facts. (14 points)


Points


Earned



 


 


 


 


 


 



 



  1. Identify each claimant (key actor) who has an interest in the outcome of this ethical issue. From the perspective of the moral agent—the individual contemplating an ethical course of action—what obligation is owed to the claimant? Why? (14 points)


Points


Earned



Claimant


(key actor)



Obligation (owed to the claimant)



Perspective (What does the claimant hope will happen?)



 



 



 



 


 


 



 



 



 



 


 


 



 



 



 



 


 


 



 



 



 



 


 


 



 



 



 



 


 


 



 



 




Evaluating Alternatives


 






















































  1. What are two alternatives for the scenario? One alternative can be a wild card that you ordinarily may not consider an option because of potential implications. Both should be within free will and control of the same moral agent. (14 points)


Points


Earned



Alternative A



Alternative B



 



 



 



 



  1. Respond to the following questions based on your developed alternatives. (14 points)


Points


Earned



 



Alternative A



Alternative B



 



What are the best- and worst-case scenarios if you choose this alternative?



 


 


 


 


 



 



 



Will anyone be harmed if this alternative is chosen? If so, how will they be harmed? Consider families and derivative effects.



 


 


 


 


 



 



 



Would honoring an idea or value—such as personal, professional, or religious—make the alternative invalid?



 


 


 


 


 


 



 



 



Are there any rules, laws, or principles that support the alternative? Are there rules, laws, or principles that make the alternative invalid? State the rule or principle and indicate if it invalidates or supports the alternative.



 


 


 


 


 


 


 



 



 



 




Applying Ethical Guidelines


 












































































  1. Consider each ethical guideline and explain whether it would support or reject your alternative. (14 points)


Points


Earned



Guidelines based on the action itself



Alternative A



Alternative B



 



Should this alternative become a rule or policy that everyone in this situation should follow in similar situations in the future? (Kant)



 



 



 



Does this alternative result in using any person as a means to an end without consideration for his or her basic integrity? (Kant)



 



 



 



Is the intent of this action free from vested interest or ulterior motive? (Kant’s good will)



 



 



 



Does this alternative demonstrate a genuine concern for others affected by the decision, and is the moral agency responding to a perceived need?



 



 



 



Guidelines based on consequences



Alternative A



Alternative B



 



Is the good that results from this alternative outweighed by the potential harm that might be done to others? (Mill’s harm principle)



 



 



 



Is any harm brought about by anyone other than the moral agent? (causal harm)



 


 



 



 



Will anyone be harmed who can be said to be defenseless? (paternalism)



 


 



 



 



To what degree is this alternative based on the moral agent’s own best interest? (ethical egoism)



 



 



 



Which alternative will generate the greatest benefit—or the least amount of harm—for the greatest number of people? Select only one alternative. (utilitarianism)



 



 



 



 


Ethical Decision Making


 


















  1. Choose to proceed with either Alternative A or Alternative B and explain the reasons for your decision. (15 points)


Points


Earned



 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 



 



TOTAL POINTS EARNED



 



 

Submitted: 2 years ago.
Category: Writing Homework
Expert:  DXJ Writer replied 2 years ago.

DXJ Writer :

Hi! Got it! I might ahve a few questions on this one:-)

Customer:

ok

DXJ Writer :

:-) I'll let you know if I do! DXJ

DXJ Writer :

Working through this now........I should be a pro on this sheet but it always takes me longer:-)

DXJ Writer :

Hope you're having a better day..........thinking of you and your family! DXJ

Customer:

Thank You!

DXJ Writer :

You're welcome!

DXJ Writer :

Should have DQ to you shortly.........had to sort through your notes fro the answers:-)

DXJ Writer :

Hope this helps! DXJ

DXJ Writer, Master's Degree
Category: Writing Homework
Satisfied Customers: 2045
Experience: Research writer, educator, tutor with 20+ years experience.
DXJ Writer and other Writing Homework Specialists are ready to help you

JustAnswer in the News:

 
 
 
Ask-a-doc Web sites: If you've got a quick question, you can try to get an answer from sites that say they have various specialists on hand to give quick answers... Justanswer.com.
JustAnswer.com...has seen a spike since October in legal questions from readers about layoffs, unemployment and severance.
Web sites like justanswer.com/legal
...leave nothing to chance.
Traffic on JustAnswer rose 14 percent...and had nearly 400,000 page views in 30 days...inquiries related to stress, high blood pressure, drinking and heart pain jumped 33 percent.
Tory Johnson, GMA Workplace Contributor, discusses work-from-home jobs, such as JustAnswer in which verified Experts answer people’s questions.
I will tell you that...the things you have to go through to be an Expert are quite rigorous.
 
 
 

What Customers are Saying:

 
 
 
  • Wonderful service, prompt, efficient, and accurate. Couldn't have asked for more. I cannot thank you enough for your help. Mary C. Freshfield, Liverpool, UK
< Last | Next >
  • Wonderful service, prompt, efficient, and accurate. Couldn't have asked for more. I cannot thank you enough for your help. Mary C. Freshfield, Liverpool, UK
  • This expert is wonderful. They truly know what they are talking about, and they actually care about you. They really helped put my nerves at ease. Thank you so much!!!! Alex Los Angeles, CA
  • Thank you for all your help. It is nice to know that this service is here for people like myself, who need answers fast and are not sure who to consult. GP Hesperia, CA
  • I couldn't be more satisfied! This is the site I will always come to when I need a second opinion. Justin Kernersville, NC
  • Just let me say that this encounter has been entirely professional and most helpful. I liked that I could ask additional questions and get answered in a very short turn around. Esther Woodstock, NY
  • Thank you so much for taking your time and knowledge to support my concerns. Not only did you answer my questions, you even took it a step further with replying with more pertinent information I needed to know. Robin Elkton, Maryland
  • He answered my question promptly and gave me accurate, detailed information. If all of your experts are half as good, you have a great thing going here. Diane Dallas, TX
 
 
 

Meet The Experts:

 
 
 
  • Steve Herrod

    Master's Degree

    Satisfied Customers:

    651
    Masters in Literature and a Bachelors Degree in French with Management
< Last | Next >
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/SP/spherrod/2012-6-6_174244_1000852.64x64.JPG Steve Herrod's Avatar

    Steve Herrod

    Master's Degree

    Satisfied Customers:

    651
    Masters in Literature and a Bachelors Degree in French with Management
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/VE/verbsrule/2013-3-25_232622_MamaandEllie.64x64.jpg verbsrule's Avatar

    verbsrule

    Bachelor's Degree

    Satisfied Customers:

    439
    8 yrs teaching experience in English and history. Writing consultant.
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/GY/gypsydust1/2012-3-31_71657_me3a.64x64.jpg DXJ Writer's Avatar

    DXJ Writer

    Master's Degree

    Satisfied Customers:

    350
    Research writer, educator, tutor with 20+ years experience.
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/ST/stayathomemomof2/2012-3-20_152711_cameracleanup362012653.64x64.JPG stayathomemomof2's Avatar

    stayathomemomof2

    Bachelor's Degree

    Satisfied Customers:

    214
    Freelance writer.
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/ED/educatortech/2012-6-7_1256_williams4.64x64.jpg Mr. Gregory White's Avatar

    Mr. Gregory White

    Master's Degree

    Satisfied Customers:

    176
    M.A., M.S. Education / Educational Administration
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/JU/judybailey61/2012-6-23_23846_Resized.64x64.jpg judybailey61's Avatar

    judybailey61

    Bachelor's Degree

    Satisfied Customers:

    167
    Two years writing expert with justanswer.
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/MB/MBJC11/2012-6-6_171228_1837551861548780869311000007725919373587357549561n.64x64.jpg Eric M.'s Avatar

    Eric M.

    Master's Degree

    Satisfied Customers:

    148
    Five years in academia, over a dozen peer-reviewed publications, multiple best paper awards, working toward PhD.
 
 
 

Related Writing Homework Questions