How JustAnswer Works:

  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.

Ask Jo C. Your Own Question

Jo C.
Jo C., Barrister
Category: UK Traffic Law
Satisfied Customers: 64982
Experience:  Over 5 years in practice.
12826847
Type Your UK Traffic Law Question Here...
Jo C. is online now
A new question is answered every 9 seconds

I have been sent a section 72? notice, which mention a possible

Resolved Question:

I have been sent a section 72? notice, which mention a possible offence (which I didnt commit since someone ran into the back of me) but Im not sure if it is an intention to prosecute or just a request for information
Submitted: 1 year ago.
Category: UK Traffic Law
Expert:  Jo C. replied 1 year ago.
Hi

Thank you for your question and welcome to Just Answer. My name is XXXXX XXXXX I will try to help with this.

In order to give you an answer tailored to your circumstances, I will just need to ask you some preliminary questions so that I can consider your position from all angles.

-Could you explain your situation a little more?

Customer: replied 1 year ago.

I was at traffic lights and someone ran into the back of me. It was a slight shunt. We both got out. She seemed OK and there didnt appear to be any damage. Neither of us asked for details. I got back into my car, and then after the lights changed drove off. I informed my insurance company the following day, who informed me that a whiplash and car damage claim had been submitted. I then received a letter from GMP saying an alleged offence had taken place...failing to stop, failing to give details and driving without due care and attention. I filled in the form to confirm that I was the driver, and am dealing through my insurance comoany. They are coming to take a staement and plan to fight the icivil claim, but obviously I' concerned about any possible police action I have not had an accident for over ten years, and have never had an issue like this - I though I was being considerate in not going after the other person for hitting my car!

Expert:  Jo C. replied 1 year ago.
I'm sorry for the delay. I had some technical issues and wasn't able to log in.

When you say a s72 notice, I presume you mean a s172 ? It should ask for the identity of the driver?
Customer: replied 1 year ago.

yes, section 172

Expert:  Jo C. replied 1 year ago.
Thanks.

I presume you were the driver on that occasion?
Customer: replied 1 year ago.

yes iI was

Expert:  Jo C. replied 1 year ago.
Thanks. I just need 10 mins to type out an answer if thats ok?
Expert:  Jo C. replied 1 year ago.
Thanks for the information.

The document you have received is confusing. It combines two legal entities. The first is a notice of intended prosecution. The second is a request under s172 for the identity of the driver.

The first point to make is that you must complete the s172 form disclosing the driver's identity. If you don't they will just charge you with failing to identify to which you wouldn't have a defence so you absolutely did the right thing by completing that

You don't admit the offence by completing that document. All you do is deal with your s172 responsibility to tell them who was driving.

The second point is the prosecution itself. They are giving you notice that they are considering a prosecution. It doesn't mean that they will necessarily. It certainly doesn't mean it will succeed. I have to say that if this a rear end shunt I would be interested to know on what basis they say you were driving without due care and attention.

There is a possible prosecution for failing to stop and report. Ultimately you didn't exchange details. There is a debate over what 'stopping' means but there is caselaw that says you have to stop long enough to provide your details. That doesn't mean hand over your insurance details necessarily as some people very sensibly don't carry them. It does mean that you have to offer a name and address.

Overall, if this is a rear end shunt and you have exchanged details now then I'm not sure they would prosecute you. Apart from anything else, she must have had some information from you to make a claim. I'm not sure it would be considered in the public interest if they facts are as you say.

Hope this helps. Please let me know if you want more information.
Customer: replied 1 year ago.

Hi


 


The document doesn't say it is a Notice of Intention to Presecute. It just says it is a request for information. I've just popped into the local police station and they have confirmed it's not a Notice of Intenton...their view was that considering the circumstances they didnt think there was a case to answer, but it is a different force that sent me the letter...and of course anything with the word POLICE written on it makes you concerned...


 


I returned the form by recorded delivery the next day

Expert:  Jo C. replied 1 year ago.
Its just a s172 form then

They don't have to give out a nip with failing to stop and report but they do for careless driving. There's no case in careless driving on these facts.

Customer: replied 1 year ago.

Is 'driving without care and attention' what you termed careless driving?

Expert:  Jo C. replied 1 year ago.
Yes, formally known as driving without due care and attention or careless driving variously in statutes. There is no case for that if this is a rear end shunt.
Jo C., Barrister
Category: UK Traffic Law
Satisfied Customers: 64982
Experience: Over 5 years in practice.
Jo C. and 3 other UK Traffic Law Specialists are ready to help you

JustAnswer in the News:

 
 
 
Ask-a-doc Web sites: If you've got a quick question, you can try to get an answer from sites that say they have various specialists on hand to give quick answers... Justanswer.com.
JustAnswer.com...has seen a spike since October in legal questions from readers about layoffs, unemployment and severance.
Web sites like justanswer.com/legal
...leave nothing to chance.
Traffic on JustAnswer rose 14 percent...and had nearly 400,000 page views in 30 days...inquiries related to stress, high blood pressure, drinking and heart pain jumped 33 percent.
Tory Johnson, GMA Workplace Contributor, discusses work-from-home jobs, such as JustAnswer in which verified Experts answer people’s questions.
I will tell you that...the things you have to go through to be an Expert are quite rigorous.
 
 
 

What Customers are Saying:

 
 
 
  • A quick response, a succinct and helpful answer in simple English. I believe I can now confront the counter party with confidence -- worth the 30 bucks! Rick Leeds, UK
< Last | Next >
  • A quick response, a succinct and helpful answer in simple English. I believe I can now confront the counter party with confidence -- worth the 30 bucks! Rick Leeds, UK
  • I did not know a French Law service existed and I was very impressed with the speed of reply --- very professional. Many thanks! Ms. Baker Alfafar, Spain
  • Thank you so much for your help. Your answers were really useful and came back so quickly. Great! Maggie USA
  • Wonderful service, prompt, efficient, and accurate. Couldn't have asked for more. I cannot thank you enough for your help. Mary C. Freshfield, Liverpool, UK
  • This expert is wonderful. They truly know what they are talking about, and they actually care about you. They really helped put my nerves at ease. Thank you so much!!!! Alex Los Angeles, CA
  • Thank you for all your help. It is nice to know that this service is here for people like myself, who need answers fast and are not sure who to consult. GP Hesperia, CA
  • I couldn't be more satisfied! This is the site I will always come to when I need a second opinion. Justin Kernersville, NC
 
 
 

Meet The Experts:

 
 
 
  • Jo C.

    Barrister

    Satisfied Customers:

    3186
    Over 5 years in practice.
< Last | Next >
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/RE/Remus2004/2012-4-22_93111_2bigstockPortraitOfConfidentFemaleL6943985.64x64.jpg Jo C.'s Avatar

    Jo C.

    Barrister

    Satisfied Customers:

    3186
    Over 5 years in practice.
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/JO/Josh2010/2012-4-29_19490_GettyImages80121770B.64x64.jpg Joshua's Avatar

    Joshua

    Lawyer

    Satisfied Customers:

    138
    LL.B (Hons), Higher Prof. Dip. Law & Practice
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/venkoj/2010-02-20_133027_ben_pic.jpg Ben Jones's Avatar

    Ben Jones

    Solicitor

    Satisfied Customers:

    30
    Solicitor with UK Traffic Law experience
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/BU/Buachaill/2012-5-25_211156_barrister5.64x64.jpg Buachaill's Avatar

    Buachaill

    Barrister

    Satisfied Customers:

    17
    17 years experience
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/JO/jojobi/2013-3-19_0265_maxlowryphoto.64x64.jpg Max Lowry's Avatar

    Max Lowry

    Solicitor

    Satisfied Customers:

    12
    LLB, 10 years post qualification experience
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/KA/Kasare/kasare.64x64.jpg Kasare's Avatar

    Kasare

    Solicitor

    Satisfied Customers:

    12
    LLB (Hons)
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/TO/touchwoodsden/2013-12-6_91518_MeforJA.64x64.jpg Stuart J's Avatar

    Stuart J

    Solicitor

    Satisfied Customers:

    174
    PGD Law. 20 years legal profession, 6 as partner in High Street practice