The sign is of very little if any effect and then whoever
put the sign up had asked for legal advice before putting the signing place, I
would to have told him to save his money.
Whether the sign is there not, the only time that this
would be actionable is in one particular person uses the space to turn round
all the time and it becomes a nuisance. Just because they might do it 10 times
a day does not necessarily mean that it is nuisance. In any event, even if it
is a nuisance, on these facts, the nuisance is not going to be worth a lot of
money in compensation.
If the sign is on land owned by someone else, they are at
liberty to put the sign of it it makes them feel better. It may deter some
people from turning which presumably, is the intention. They are not entitled.
However, the sign up on land which belongs to anybody else. The location
therefore of the proposed that the sign is on is extremely relevant images on
the land, which is jointly owned the one person putting it there should have
the consent of the other three.
The other three are entitled to remove it, provided they
do not damage it because that then can become criminal damage.
Can I help further?
Please bear with me today and
over any weekends because I will be online and off-line.
Please don't forget to positively rate my answer service (even if it was not
what you wanted to hear) and I will follow up any further points you raise for
If you don't rate it positively, then the site keep your deposit and I get 0
for my time. It is imperative that you give my answer a positive rating. It
doesn't give me "a pat on the head", "good boy" (like ebay), it is my
If in ratings you feel that you expected more or it only helped a little,
please ask me for further info before rating me negatively otherwise I don't
get paid at all for my time and answer.
The thread remains open for us to continue this exchange