UK Property Law
Ask an UK Property Law Question, Get an Answer ASAP!
No - the neighbour is saying it's all the fault of our wall and therefore it's all our responsibility. Our roofer has said that the flashing is of poor standard, but the neighbour believes his roofer and says it did the job for years until our render degraded. Part of the problem is that our builder is no longer able to do it due to illness so we have to find somebody else, all builders have waiting lists and the neighbour is threatening legal action if we don't get it done straight away.
I don't know specifically about the flashing cost, as our plasterer was going to include it in the rerender job which would be roughly £1000. Our property is 260 years old. The flats next door were built in the 1970s to replace old cottages.
So was this flashing put in a long time ago or was it put in in the 1970s?
Is the neighbour's property one of the flats that was built to replace the old cottages ?
I need to know the general layout etc please.
We are in a terrace on a hill. Against our gable is a block property which has 4 flats, 2 above and 2 below. The flats are down the hill and smaller so their roofline is lower than ours. The landlord of the lower one next to our property is the one we're talking about, but apparently the upper flat (which I think is privately owned) has leakage as well.
I don't know when the flashing was done, but the landlord is saying that he's spent hundreds of pounds trying to solve the problem to no avail.
The owner of the upper flat came to us some months ago to ask permission to cut into our wall for the flashing to be redone to try and solve the leak. I think work was done on it then but they never cut into our wall.
PS The cottages next to here were demolished and then the flats built on their footprint in the 1970s
Obviously, the cost of the rendering comes down to you.
If the brokenrendering is caused problem with their property you would be responsible forthat damage but that doesn't seem to be an issue that they are pursuing.
It is thennecessary to look back in time (which may not be possible) to when the cottageswere there to establish whether the cottages had any benefit of any flashing orwhether there was a gap.
If there was agap and the flashing was only put in when the flats were built, I think itbecomes completely the neighbour's responsibility because you get no benefitfrom it.
If howeverthere was flashing of some description, albeit of a different form or shapewhen the cottages were there on the cottages had been there since time prior toliving memory, I think you are jointly responsible.
Compared tothe cost of the rendering, the cost of the flashing is probably going to beless than the cost of arguing the toss in court.
I'm inclinedto think, imagining the construction and from a practical point of view that itwould be prudent to suggest that the cost of the flashing, but not the render,is split equally between you.
It willcertainly be cheaper and less risky than arguing the toss in court which to behonest, could go either way and would certainly need the involvement of thesurveyor which on its own, for a report would cost between £600 and £800although the winner would get that cost back
Does that answer the question? Can I assist further or answerany specific queries?
If you have not done already, please don't forget to positivelyrate my answer service even if it was not what you wanted to hear. You shouldnow see a series of buttons which enable you to rate my answer serviceformally.If you don't rate it positively, then the site keep your deposit and I get 0for my time. It is imperative that you give my answer a positive rating. It doesn't give me, "a pat on the head", "good boy" (like ebay), it is mylivelihood!If in ratings you feel that you expected more or it only helped a little,please ask.
The thread does remain open for me to answer follow-up questionsafter rating my answer service.Rating doesn't close the enquiry atall even though the site may give that impression. It remains open for you toread and ask for further clarification.Regards.
PS Experts on here are online and off-line all day each day andweekends so please bear with me if I do not get back to you immediately.
PS. I use voice type, voice recognition typing because I onlytype with two fingers and it would take me ages. Sometimes, a computer does nothear me correctly and you will get an incoherent word. I do try to butsometimes they slip through. I apologise therefore if anything doesn't makesense. It is me losing it, not you. Just ask if anything is not clear please.
Thank you for this info. He is the sort of person who shouts you down with blanket statements so we wanted to be able to reply with some sound knowledge. We've just been looking at photos and realise the roof of the flats is higher against our wall than the cottages were (we can't see any flashing on the cottages but the picture isn't clear) - does that make a difference?
Thank you. In fact, the fact that the original flashing was lowerby virtue of the original cottage rooms being lower would lead anyone tobelieve that the flashing had been there for a long time I think the fact thatit is now in a slightly different (higher up) position makes no difference.
In the absence of anything to the contrary therefore it would bejoint.
Why not show this thread print off to your neighbour?
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).