The tenant did not specifically ask about disturbances, other than "is it a quiet area" that kind of thing.
My co-freeholders are new owners, who were moving in almost exactly when I moved out of the property ( in May ), and when I started to let out my property. The new owners did tell me of their plans to do some work to the property, but not in any officially capacity or in written form. But at that time I had no idea of the scope of works or how long it would last. There were no plans at that point to look at for instance.
frankly I can't remember if I mentioned it to the tenant or not, as there were no concrete plans at all at that point, and the potential new owners had not even completed at that point, or in fact moved in.
In terms of the "quiet area" question, I answered that it was. Because usually it is very quiet.
The main concern my tenant has is with the scaffolding being erected in his demise for what could be a 4 month period. In general terms is there a point when the amount of time scaffolding is erected for stops being 'reasonable'? And therefore can there be a case for compensating from the party undertaking the work?
thanks for the answer. I have one detail I need to outline. There is no suggestion that my tenant is suggesting I misrepresented the situation - I didn't at all.
He is talking about asking for compensation from the new owners who are undertaking the work - for unnecessary irritation and disturbance - mainly due to the scaffolding and the duration it will be up for - but also the accompanying noise etc etc. Do we have a case for this? does he have any rights as regards XXXXX XXXXX affects of building work which is not under our control?
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).