I recently bought a flat with 78 years remaining on the lease. The seller agreed to assign the lease extension on completion as long as paid their legal costs. This I did via the solicitor acting on my behalf. Some two weeks later I was informed the assignment of the lease had been refused as it had not been signed by the then owner. The landlord has agreed to negotiate the renewal directly but only at 76 years. This being when I would now have the legal right to do so, Needles to say this will involve financial loss to me. The sellers solicitors have failed to respond to a letter setting out my claim. I have been told by legal firm that I have no claim against anyone as the sellers solicitor worked for the seller and not me despite my paying their costs. There advice is that I should proceed with the extension and bear the extra cost. Surely someone is responsible for a service I paid for. I most upset by the failure of the Legal Company who made the error to reply to my solicitors letter.
Hello, I am LawDenning and I am a practising solicitor in a High Street practice. I have beenan expert on this website in UK law since 2008. During that time, as youappreciate, I have answered thousands of questions from satisfied users on avariety of subjects.
Becausewe are all in practice with clients and court and other users, I might not always respond in minutes,particularly evenings and weekends. Please bear with me in that caseIt is my pleasure to try and assist you with this today. Please bear with mewhile I gather some further information from you in order for me to be able toadvise you fully.
How much do the landlords now want?
Was this statutory lease extension?
WAs this included in the contract documentation?
I am wondering why you didn't get the extension.
Was the seller partway through the extension process when the property was sold?
I need full background please. Thanks
Sorry if I was not clear I was worried the question would be too long.
At my request he sellers agreed to make a statutory application prior to the sale and then assign this request to me on completion.
I agreed to pay all the sellers legal costs £395 plus the valuation costs again £395.
The lease extension was agreed prior to sale and contract redrafted to
The assignment of the lease was refused because the sellers solicitor had failed to get the the correct people to sign it on the sellers side. No one will explain why but suspect this due to it being an executors sale and confusion between executors and owners. By the way the Executors
are both partners in the sellers law firm. This is something my solicitor admitted this same firm had done 3 times before.
The flat is in a good position by the town centre in Poole, Dorset. I bought it during a trough property values that is unlikely to continue hence why I am keen to extend the lease using the current market valuation rather than wait 2 years.
The Landlord refused the application correctly on failure to correctly complete the documentation.
They have however offered to renew on an informal basis but only as if the lease had 76 years years to run rather than the current 78. I have now had to have a new valuation at a further £395 which suggests the new renewal value will be between £600 - £1,000. I suspect Landord will go for a higher figure.
I am worried that continuing the negotiations with only the goodwill of the Landlord will leave me at a disadvantage throughout the process. Alongside being seriously out of pocket.
The partner in my legal firm tells me my only claim is for breach of contract from the previous owner a very old lady in France who did nothing wrong. Something I simply will not consider. Otherwise he says I should carry on renew the lease as offered by Landord and on completion ask if the sellers solicitors to refund and difference in value. No mention of fees paid and second valuation.
My solicitor telephoned Jacon Reeves when this happened and admitted they did not seem to take it very seriously. She wrote more formally in mid-April and admits to having not received a reply hence my worry in being dependent on their goodwill.
The two sets of solicitors sit within walking distance of each other and I worry they want this to just go away. My main grievance is that they took my money and have failed to supply any service and then have simply ignored me.
Assumingthat this was included in the contract as a term of the contract that theseller would extend the lease before completion.
Thatis the case, and the seller is in breach of contract.
Yourcause of action is against the Seller, the old lady in France who has donenothing wrong. If you have to issue proceedings, then you issue them againsther and she must take it up with her solicitors will appear, on the face ofthis to have been negligent.
I don'tknow whether she has paid the landlord any fees or not, but the landlord is notentitled to keep the fee and then charge you.
Howmuch is this going to cost to rectify?
Whydoes your own solicitor want to do nothing?
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).