When you purchased the property did a conveyancer act in your purchase?
Is it the case that the lender was to have a charge on both titles but (for whatever reason) has ended up with a charge on one only?
When we originally purchased the property we did have a conveyancer in 2001 & the deeds were registered on both titles.
We remortgaged in 2004, & the solicitors were the mortgage cos. solicitors, it is these that haven't registered on both titles. Yes I think they should have registered on both, but as you say have only registered on one. I do appreciate it is an error, but still wonder if I can gain in some way.
If you own the title free of a charge then you could in theory transfer it to whoever you like by using the Land Registry's TR1 form and submitting it to them with their Form AP1 to register the change in ownership.
The difficulty is that during the sale process of the other title the Buyer's and their solicitors are likely to become aware of the discrepancy of the property marketed to them and the land shown on the one title over which the lender has a charge. The problem will be revealed and the lender will take steps to attempt to secure their right to sell the second title. If you executed a mortgage deed during the remortgage or original purchase for all of land (ie. including both titles) then you would have accepted that there is a charge over both titles, the fact that it has not been registered does not change this and a Court would likely take the view that the lender is entitled to have a charge registered over the second title (and to sell it).
If the buyers purchased only the first title repossessed by the lender and did not become aware of the second title, but there were debts outstanding on the mortgage following sale then the lender would look to claim this from you. The courts have the power to set aside transactions which were made with a view to defrauding creditors and that would be what transferring the second title to a relative would be I'm afraid.
The lender is under a duty to get a reasonable price for the property they are selling, if they are found not to have done that and you still owe them money then you could ask a court to re-assess the amount owed to the lender. If you suspect they are not doing this then you should speak to a property litigation specialist or write to them personally expressing your concerns. If you continue doing this it will corroborate any claim you have against them later.
I would advise you to be honest with the mortgage company, there is obviously a tension between on the one hand claiming that the lender is not getting a reasonable price and on the other being aware of the second title and not disclosing it.
You can find litigation solicitors via this website:-
Sorry it could not be better news.
If this is useful please kindly click accept so that I may be rewarded for my time. It will be gratefully received and you will be free to ask follow up questions.
Thank you for your reply. That does make things clear.
I do have one further question.
I appreciate that any transfer to a family member would not be appropriate, however -
If there was a loan outstanding to a family member (from a few years ago) - could that family member place a charge on the piece of land as security - meaning the land wouldn't be transferred in name to the family member. Just a thought.
Thank you for your kind accept.
A family member could take a charge on the property either with your agreement or by applying for a charging order on it from the Court if you do not agree to it being so placed. It does not get around the fact that you a aware that the lender should have a charge on it but doesn't though and, as such, are probably under a duty to reveal it to the lender.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).