Get UK Law Questions Answered by Verified Experts
Hello do you have a specific question about this please?
Hi. The reason you are experiencing delay is that you keep posting before I have responded which pushes the question to the back of my list.
On your specific points
She doesn't have to state a date and time. It is something she would be asked about but obviously some allegations cannot be timed.
Whether she can be sure is a matter for cross examination. She is clearly saying she is sure.
No, there is no need for another witness. This is the hardest type of witness to knock down. Random stranger, no reason to want to get you in trouble, no history of making allegations. There are witnesses who do lie but not usually about random strangers who have done nothing to annoy them.
Not really. She actually probably didn't leave it that long anyway. It was probably just that the police didn't take her statement for that long. Even if she had though you are still left with the problem of why would she lie.
Can I clarify anything for you?
Why would she lie about you?
People do sometimes but why specifically about you?
Oh well, of course she isn't. Normal people have better things to do with their lives than make repeated reports to the police.
But why would she lie about you particularly? What is her grievance with you?
It doesn't work like that I'm afraid. Defendants give instructions and lawyers act upon them. Lawyers don't tell them what to say.
If there is no particular reason she would be lying about you then you are left with challenging whether or not she can be sure.
At least if it remains outraging public decency you can have crown court trial before a proper jury that would give you a fair trial.
It is always easier to get courts to accept mistake rather than lies anyway.
Witnesses do lie all the time. Sometimes it is about unimportant stuff and sometimes they make up allegations altogether but not usually for no reason at all.
There are people who do it for attention but usually they make up allegations against unknown people.
She may have a long standing history of doing this in which case that weakens the allegation.
I would brace yourself though. They are charging far too much at the moment. That is the real reason the conviction rate is low. If you are going to prosecute the lies of unreliable accusers you are not going to get convictions.
It depends on her really. If she has a history of doing this then they may summons her anyway as they will have had enough of her wasting their time.
Well, there isn't any way of guaranteeing that. I suppose you could tell the OIC.
Outraging public decency doesn't lead to addition to the register.
There is always the possibility of acquittal.
Yes, it will if charged I'm afraid.