Get UK Law Questions Answered by Verified Experts
Can you please explain the mechanics of what you were doing it again?
Had the buyer exchanged contracts with you ?
You appear to be selling a shared ownership property and then buying another property but I don't know what what basis you were buying ,
I am therefore wondering exactly what went wrong here?
perhaps I'm just being stupid .
I have managed the property department of the firm of solicitors for 20 years and therefore I have come across most things but I think perhaps the facts may be a bit mixed up. Thank you
hi apologies if unclear
we are selling a shared equity property for £45k. Our buyers pulled out after exchange of contracts sacrificing their 10% deposit. We were buying a property for £210k which we now cannot complete on. We were never advised by our solicitors that this could happen. Legally we are being told that we could be sued for the 10% deposit. When we signed the contract however in sure that the deposit value was left blank and the solicitors must have completed it themselves post signature.
what i am trying to determine is whether my solicitors have done something illegal in doing that which could null and void the contract
For the purposes of this, it is irrelevant that it is sharedownership.
You are selling a property for £45,000 and the buyer paid adeposit of 10%, £4,500 which you now have and your buyer, who pulled out, has lost.
As a result of losing your buyer you can no longer proceed withyour purchase and you are potentially being pursued for the deposit of 10% onyour purchase of £210,000.
The solicitors should have not agreed to a 10% deposit if you didnot have a 10% deposit.
The deposit you had is £4500 which was coming from your buyer what is known as "the deposit coming down thechain".
So you get the £4500 from your buyer and you pay it to the seller.You make no money but you don't lose anything although you obviously lose thelegal costs.
Your solicitor should have amended the contract for the housethat you were buying and agreed with the sellers of the much reduced deposit.
In the solicitors did not do that, then they are negligent. Ofcourse, the people selling to you do not have to accept less than 10% in whichcase, your sale could not go ahead could not exchange contracts in any event. Thesolicitor put in the deposit amount at 10%, you have a claim against thesolicitor for whatever your loss is.
Does that answer the question? Can I help anyfurther?
If you have not done already, please don't forget to positivelyrate my answer service even if it was not what you wanted to hear. You shouldnow see a series of buttons which enable you to rate my answer service formally.If you don't rate it positively, then the site keep your deposit and I get 0for my time. It is imperative that you give my answer a positive rating. It doesn't give me, "a pat on the head", "good boy" (like ebay), it is mylivelihood!If in ratings you feel that you expected more or it only helped a little,please ask.
The thread does remain open for me to answer follow-up questionsafter rating my answer service.Rating doesn't close the enquiry atall even though the site may give that impression. It remains open for you toread and ask for further clarification.Regards.
PS Experts on here are online and off-line all day each day andweekends so please bear with me if I do not get back to you immediately.
PS. I use voice type, voice recognition typing because I onlytype with two fingers and it would take me ages. Sometimes, a computer does nothear me correctly and you will get an incoherent word. I do try to butsometimes they slip through. I apologise therefore if anything doesn't make sense.It is me losing it, not you. Just ask if anything is not clear.
so just to confirm if we get sued we should get another solicitor to sue our current solicitors for neglagence?
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).