Get UK Law Questions Answered by Verified Experts
No,my brother has no interest in the paintings.
Is your motherstill alive?
How did you acquirethe paintings?
I need the fullbackground details please
My mother's dead. We acquired the paintings on inheritance.
So were thepaintings left to you jointly in the will?
Please explain how he got jewellery from you in exchange but he still retains an interest in them.
I am wondering how he sold them but retains some copyright. Was that agreed? Do you accept that?
My mother died intestate so we inherited her estate jointly.
The jewellery was worth less than the probable value of the paintings,so we agreed on that exchange.
We made the agreement that we keep joint copyright.
It does need hisagreement, although if you do it without his agreement, all that is likely tohappen is that if he decided to take this to court, he will be awarded 50% ofwhatever profit you make on the publications.
If you simplypublish them so that people can see them FoC, for the greater good, then he can allege that he has suffered aloss because the images could have been sold.
If you arepublishing them on the Internet, then get a specialist company to do it and thatway, they can incorporate a "tracking pixel" so that if anybody else uses itwithout your consent, you can send them a bill. The likes of Getty Images usespecialist software which trawls the Internet looking for people using unlicensedimages and stinging them for the licence fee. In that respect, it might beworthwhile getting hold of Getty to see whether they would be interested indealing with this for you and dealing with your reluctant brother's copyrightissue.
Doesthat answer the question? Can I help further? Can I answer any specific points?
Please don't forget topositively rate my answer service even if it was not what you wanted to hear. Youshould now see a series of buttons which enable you to rate my answer serviceformally.If you don't rate it positively, then the site keep your deposit and I get 0for my time. It is imperative that you give my answer a positive rating. It doesn't give me, "a pat on the head", "good boy" (like ebay), it is mylivelihood!If in ratings you feel that you expected more or it only helped a little,please ask. The thread does remain open for me to answer follow-up questions after ratingmy answer.
Thanks for your answer,but I don't believe you've answered the question
I wish to place images of my mother's paintings on the net in order to sell
the paintings themselves.not the images. If successful I would sell the
paintings and give a third of the profit to my brother. Does using the images for the sale of the paintings transgress on his copyright? .
I'msorry, I misunderstood that. I thought you was getting rid of them and wantedto preserve images for broadcast. I see now that the purpose of the broadcastis to sell
Thereis an agreement between you, it seems that you are allowed to sell thepaintings provided you give him one third of the profit.
Ithink it would be implied into that agreement if this went to court, that ifsomeone was thinking of buying the picture they would want to see it and ifthey wanted to see it, short of them travelling from wherever they are to lookat the picture personally, they would want to see an image of it. So either heis agreeing for you to sell it, or he is not.
Theother issue, of course, is that by not allowing you to do what you are proposingto do, he would be severely prejudicing any money that you get the paintingsand he would also of course we are limiting the amount that he gets.
Ofcourse, if these paintings are worth tens or hundreds of thousands of pounds ormillions of pounds and prospective buyers will travel all around the world, butthey will want to see a picture of what they are buying. If your brothers(potential) argument is to have any credibility, then known one would be ableto see anything other than the original painting. It makes selling them animpossibility.
As Isaid, if you are selling the pictures, then evenly be objects to it because youare breaching his copyright, he is only entitled to damages and the damageswould be the amount of money that he's getting for the sale of the paintings inany event.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).