Get UK Law Questions Answered by Verified Experts
In regards XXXXX XXXXX I was told by homeoffice that I must not be out the country for a continuous 2 years period to retain my ILR. Even if I have make a single trip for a day only to avoid continous 2 years out of country period, my ILR will remain valid.
In my case, I got my ILR in Aug 2009 and has been out of country from Nov 10 (except 2 weeks visit Mar 11 for 2 weeks), so I don't think I have breached any ILR rule as oppose to what you are indicating that I may have lost my ILR.
Please elaborate your comments regarding "revoking of ILR".
You were allowed to re-enter the UK for a period of two weeks starting sometime in March 2011.
You were not questioned upon your return about why you had spent a significant time outside of the UK and why you were returning.
The UKBA retains a discretion to revoke a person's ILR if they have been out of the country for extended periods of time.
Generally, this is taken to be if a person has 6 consecutive months outside of the UK and appears to have uproot their settled home life from the UK to elsewhere. It's quite inconsistently applied and you can see from the link above that a person can apply for a returning resident's visa. You will note that the eligilbity requirements are that the person has been outside the UK for less than 2 years, thus implying that the position at which the UKBA shall revoke lies some before 2 years.
You should get in touch with the UKBA and check whether you will have any problems re-entering or whether you shoudl apply for a returning resident's visa before you travel. Trust this clarifies, please click accept. Kind regards.Tom