Ask an UK Law Question, Get an Answer ASAP!
I'll try to assist.
First things first, in order to review appropriate sentence we need to identify the specific offence for the case study - sorry to be pedantic but there is a huge range of these offences, from sexual activity in the presence of a child to grooming. What exactly does the case study provide as the alleged offence?
Thanks for the info.
Life sentence is not applicable in this case, charge would be one under s.1 Protection of Children Act 1978 or s.160 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988. Maximum sentence for manufacturing/possession with intent to distribute/distribution is 10 years under s.1 PCA and 5 years under s.160 CJA or, if the offender is assessed as dangerous, imprisonment for public protection - otherwise know as IPP or an indefinite sentence.
In this case we would be looking at the upper limit of the regular sentence, but more likely the indefinite sentence, as the aggravating factors are extreme.
1. Direct involvement with the manufacture
2. Involvement of family member
3. Involvement of friends
4. Distribution/intent to distribute
5. Images all around the level 4 area
6. Large number of images
7. Young children
The previous conviction for possession of class B will be disregarded entirely, not relevant and very minor, and defendant would be treated as if he was of good character.
1. Good character
2. Guilty plea? If so, can expect 1/3 off what he would have received after trial or, in case of IPP, 1/3 off the tariff of years before he can apply for release/parole
That's about it for mitigation on this one.
IPP - if a conviction for a 'serious specified offence' (i.e. one that carries a maximum of at least 10 years) or a 'specified sexual offence' (i.e. one listed under Criminal Justice Act 2003) occurs then the court has to consider whether or not the defendant is a danger to the public. This assessment usually takes the form of a pre-sentence report from the Probation Service and, where necessary, a report from a forensic psychiatrist.
If the court is satisfied on the basis of the PSR and/or psych report, it must impose an IPP. To give an example, an individual is convicted of the distribution offence, level 5 images, aggravated etc and the Judge would, if the defendant was not dangerous, sentence him to 9 years imprisonment. As the defendant is dangerous, it must be an IPP and he will be sentenced to an IPP with a tariff of 4 1/2 years. He will serve at least 4 1/2 years imprisonment and can not be released until he is assessed as no longer posing a threat to the public. Hence indefinite sentence. The reason for the tariff being set at half the term determinate (i.e. the term of years, in this case 9) is that generally anyone handed down a determinate sentence will serve only half in prison before release on licence.
For this one, I'd expect an assessment of dangerousness simply due to the levels of the images, the number, the age of the children and the involvement of a family member. Given the aggravating factors, I'd expect a determinate sentence of 6 - 8 years, so an IPP of 3-4 years minimum.
Other orders that would likely be imposed at the same time are 1. registration and 2. Sexual Offences Prevention Order prohibiting all contact with children under 18 years.
Hope that assists, apologies if it's a bit lengthy.
Feel free to ask any follow up questions that occur.
Useful reference for you might be the sentencing guidelines to the Sexual Offences Act 2003. Although the offences in this case aren't governed by that Act it provides very detailed guidelines for those offences.
Might also want to check out the CPS page on indecent images for caselaw.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).