Are there any children involved?
Yes we have a 13 year old son who lives equally with both of us although Paul gets benefits based on XXXXX XXXXXving with him.
The basic position is that one tenant-in-common of a property owned with another can apply to Court for an order that the property be sold (or that the other buys them out and takes over the mortgage). These orders are seldom refused unless there are children of the owners who need to be housed and the sale of the house would mean that their welfare would be compromised because they would be in difficulty of that person re-housing themselves in accommodation that is appropriate for the children.
If your ex-partner would be able to re-house himself following sale in a property that is suitable for your son to live there then it is probable that an order would be made for the sale of the house or a transfer of equity (if he can receive a mortgage offer in his own name) because the Courts are not keen on people remaining on the title to a property/mortgage when they do not wish to do so.
You would have to instruct a solicitor to make the application for you and they would write to your ex-partner first in the hope that the situation can be resolved without the need to make an application to Court to avoid the cost/stress.
In the absence of any express agreement to the contrary it is assumed that each party holds their shares equally.
If you ex-partner is claiming that your son lives with him full time and claiming benefits on this basis then he should get in contact about getting re-assessed. It is probably benefit fraud.
If this is useful please kindly click accept so that I may be rewarded for my time. It will be gratefully received and you will be free to ask follow up questions.
Sorry I have just thought, he runs his internet business from home and is saying that it will cause him a problem as it will be difficult to find anywhere big enough that he could afford to be able to run his business and live as well and seperate premises would cost too much
It does not affect your right to apply for an order for sale. He would have to prove that to the Court in any event and prove that he could not make alternative arrangements. Even then it is unlikely to affect that an order would be made in your favour, though it's conceivable that some time might be afforded to him in order to make alternative arrangement because, as I say, the Courts are not minded to allow persons to remain as registered owners when they do not wish to do so otherwise than in exceptional circumstances (eg. children).
Thank you for your very kind accept.
Your help has been great
Have a great day
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).