Thanks for your question..
You can just ignore the covenant and proceed if you like, but I would suggest taking out indemnity insurance if you do. You do not generally require a genealogist's report in order to receive a quote for restrictive covenant indemnity policies. Call some of the providers, I think you'll find you can get one easily with a report.
Neighbours, for example, could in theory apply for the Court for an order that the covenant be enforced against your plans for development but given the age of the covenant it is fairly unlikely to be enforced unless th neighbour themselves can produce other evidence that their enjoyment of their property would be significantly negatively effected.
You could apply to the Lands Tribunal for a modification or release from the covenant, but considering that the age of the covenant I would have thought this overkill - it's expensive and time consuming.
If this has been useful please kindly click accept so that I may be rewarded for my time. It will be gratefully received and you will be free to ask follow up questions.Kind regards,Tom
Thanks that's really helpful. Just one more thing, the covenant was made in 1895 when the beneficary was 68 years old I have found records of a wife but non of any children, he had 2 brothers and 3 sister one of whom I have found a record of being a spinster. If I continue my research would an insurance company accept all my findings if presented in the stlye of a report?
We have already breached 2 of the covenants and have done so for over 20 years, if a beneficary did come forward would this weaken their case to enforce the covenant as they have not contested the breach's thus far? There is no mention in the convenant of annexation or assingment of benefit I understand that as this covenant was made before 1st January 1926 does this mean that the covenant was not for the benefit of the coventees land.
If you have breached the other covenants for 20 years or more then they will not be able to enforce those breaches of covenants so don't worry about them.
You will only have to give details to the indemnity providers of your attempts to contact those with the benefit of the covenant, they will make an assessment on they likelihood of a person coming foward. It would seem highly unlikely in your case and you will almost certainly be able to get a policy.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).