hello - apologies but my internet connection is slow here in west africa
yes i am dismayed - the problemi have is that i need to be back in the uk soon !!
we have also been issued pio cards from India - in order for my son to leave india we had to get an exit clearance stamp for him which involved having police interviews etc to confirm parenthood
and the police were satisfied with parenthood?
your wife's was successful?
Where the Entry Clearance Officer disputes a relationship or implies deception (i.e. that he is not your son) then the burden of proof is on them to prove the falsity. I will forward the link to you.
You should ask them to reconsider on this basis and given that the police accepted the relationship (if they did) - also include records of his birth from the Indian formal authorities if possible. The best form of evidence though is a DNA test which can be expensive.
The only problem is that reconsideration and/or an appeal will take time - you should direct any such correspondence directly to the British High Commissioner though. I would also suggest putting in a complaint to try to speed matters up.
The quickest solution may, however, be to simply apply for a new visa for him but with the evidence as above and counteracting the reasons for refusal.
yes the police were satisfied - the zimbabwean embassy had physically verified and seen the indian birth record before approving a zimbabwean birth certificate - what i did not show on the application was the indian birth certificate - which i have. has the appeals process not become shorter? the cost of another application will be 800 pounds!
ok that is good about the police -you can also explain that the Zimbabwean Embassy were satisfied as above - do you think you could get a supporting letter from the Embassy to provide to the British Embassy in Nigeria?
Have the Embassy given you a right of appeal or an administrative review?
An administrative review generally takes 28 days in total, however, this is not available for points based system dependants but only for the applicant themselves. A dependant would usually get a right of appeal instead but this can take some time.
Given the costs of the fresh application, I would apply for reconsideration and put in an appeal to expedite matters. It is worth putting in a complaint so the Embassy may have to deal with it quicker but from experience they can still be quite slow. I would suggest putting in an administrative review with the fresh evidence and explaining the compassionate circumstances also and how this is a breach of human rights as your wife and you have visas and your son is being denied the right to travel with you. They may not accept an administrative review but it is worth a shot at getting their attention.
Another way to speed up a decision is to apply for judicial review but this can be costly as it goes to the High Court in the UK. It is worth putting in a pre action judicial review letter, however, in the meantime giving the Embassy 14 days to respond. You may require the services of a lawyer to do this.
The case/link referred to above whereby the burden of proof in an allegation of fraud is on the Embassy (the Respondent) is as follows;
4.10 The need for evidence
4.11 As with any refusal it is important to have evidence to support the decision. The wording of paragraph 322(1A) states "false representations have been made or false documents or information have been submitted" i.e. the burden of proof is on caseworkers (and not the applicant) to prove a false representation and that it was made for the purpose of obtaining leave. The standard of proof rests on the balance of probabilities, for matters of false representations, documents and other information it is a higher balance of probabilities than normal…
I hope that helps. Please let me know if you have any further questions arising from the above. In the meantime, please click accept on my answer.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).