I'm going to ignore the initial property because it appears thatjust within the marriage it was bought and sold the way that people buy andsell our house, and move house, within a marriage, as people normally do.
So you have a long marriage of nine years +3
you have 2 houses, one worth 360 with 135 of equity
the other with £70,000 of negative equity
so the equity in the marriage is £65,000.
On this as being a relatively long marriage. It would add inalso, at the time you were together before marriage.
Regarding the division of assets, if there are no childrenthe starting point is 50-50.
That then gets adjusted depending on time married and need toprovide for children and who has them and unequal inputs.
For example a girl with nothing marries a millionaire and getsdivorced after 12 months. She wouldn't get 50%
If they had been married for 40 years but never worked she isstill unlikely to get 50% but would get a substantial chunk.
If he wasn't a millionaire and she worked and contributed, after40 years she would get 50%, maybe more.
It isn't an exact science or calculation. The fact that a housemay now be in one name only matters not a jot. If one party put all the equityin, say from an old house, that will adjust the split in their favour,diminishing as time goes on.
"With all my worldly goods I thee endow" doesn't work inlaw!.
This may be useful http://www.bbc-law.co.uk/divorce-finances-faq.php
Youhave no children and I think therefore all the assets, would be lumped togetherand split 50-50. Your ages in this case are immaterial.
Thereis one potential fly in the ointment and that is the gift from the family.
Itwould depend when that was made and whether it was a gift to the pair of you.
Ifit was made very recently and just to him, the chances are that would be takeninto account and would go in his share in the balance divided. If it was a giftto you it would simply go into the pot. If it was a gift to him but made sometime ago, would be divided. Once again, there is no exact formula.
There is a very slim possibilityof a liability for spousal maintenance, maintenance paid to keep a spouse , asopposed to children. Although most commonly paid from husband to wife, that isnot necessarily the case. Spousal maintenance is based on both incomes, abilityto earn money, previous lifestyles and most importantly, need. It is not aboutequalising incomes. There is no exact formula, but these links will give somereading..
Does that answer the question? Can I assistfurther or answer any specific queries?
If you have not done already, please don't forget to positivelyrate my answer service even if it was not what you wanted to hear. You shouldnow see a series of buttons which enable you to rate my answer serviceformally.If you don't rate it positively, then the site keep your deposit and I get 0for my time. It is imperative that you give my answer a positive rating. It doesn't give me, "a pat on the head", "good boy" (like ebay), it is mylivelihood!If in ratings you feel that you expected more or it only helped a little,please ask.
The thread does remain open for me to answer follow-up questionsafter rating my answer service.Rating doesn't close the enquiry atall even though the site may give that impression. It remains open for you toread and ask for further clarification.Regards.
PS Experts on here are online and off-line all day each day andweekends so please bear with me if I do not get back to you immediately.
PS. I use voice type, voice recognition typing because I onlytype with two fingers and it would take me ages. Sometimes, a computer does nothear me correctly and you will get an incoherent word. I do try to butsometimes they slip through. I apologise therefore if anything doesn't makesense. It is me losing it, not you. Just ask if anything is not clear please.
Thank you. I understand there is not an exact calculation and that's the reason we are finding it so difficult to reach an agreement.
You say "If one party put all the equity in, say from an old house, that will adjust the split in their favour,diminishing as time goes on." Does this mean that after 12 years his share would still be higher or is it normal to expect a 50/50 start. As we are negotiating outside of court, the starting point for us is quite important. Should he get +60% or 50% to start with?.
In regards XXXXX XXXXX gift from his family, it was given +5yrs ago. I think it was a gift to the marriage but he argues it was to him only. This was invested in the property that is in negative equity. So based on this, his share of the loss is bigger? or would that mean that from the total equity of the two properties we first have to return the "gift money" to him and split the rest?
I am not interested in maintenance.
Sorry if I am trying to be too detailed but it is the base to our negotiation.
After 12 months, as you were getting divorced, each would properly come out with what they came in with.
But as time goes on, the split flattens out till eventually, it becomes 50-50, and I think that you are approaching that point indeed, if you have not got to it already
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).