Hello, my name is XXXXX XXXXX it is my pleasure to be able to assist with your question today. Please clarify what is the reason you are at risk of redundancy now? What reason(s) is the employer relying on to make you redundant?
My role is no longer required because of cost cutting measures. Also this was a promotion role this year which has been cut down and left me no choice but to look for another role. I accepted another role I was offered in the same department on a temporary basis however it requires expertise in different asset class not the same as my previous role. Also, this new role is not a for promotion role. Btw, this relates to middle office function in a bank and I transferred from outside UK less than 2 years ago, however been employed by the same firm for 4 years. I do not have anything in writing and if I have to claim redundancy pay what would my rights be?
ok so to clarify, your previous role was made redundant and as an alternative to redundancy you have been offered this new role but you do not believe it is suitable, is this correct?
yes that's correct but does the suitability of the new role depend on career prospects for the employee or it only depends on the nature of the job alone if its in the same location, pay grade? Also, what is the usual redundancy offer made by banks?
When a redundancy situation arises, an employer has a duty to consider and offer the affected employees any suitable alternative employment (“SAE”) that may exist at the time. The objective is to keep the employee in employment rather than make them redundant.
If an employee accepts an offer of SAE, their employment will continue in the new position and they would lose their entitlement to a redundancy payment.
If the offer is considered unsuitable and the employee refuses it, they will still keep their entitlement to redundancy pay. However, if an offer of SAE has been made and the employee unreasonably refuses it, they would lose their entitlement to redundancy pay.
The factors that would usually make an offer unsuitable or a refusal reasonable are as follows:
If the employer makes an offer of alternative employment, where the terms and conditions differ from their current ones, the employee has the right to a 4-week trial period in that job, which can be extended by mutual consent. If during or immediately after the trial period they decide against taking the job then they should tell their employer straight away. This will not affect their employment rights, including their right to receive statutory redundancy pay.
In summary, there are a number of factors, as explained above, which would make an alternative offer unsuitable, in which case it can be rejected and the employee's redundancy rights would remain unaffected.
As to the offer of redundancy, there is no such thing as a 'usual' offer. Each employer must pay at least the statutory minimum amount. Any enhancements on top of that are entirely at their discretion, subject to any enhanced redundancy clause contained in your contract.
So, in case I refuse an offer do I need to serve 4-week period to claim redundancy pay? What happens in case I find a job externally during the 4-week period, does that make me lose the entitlement to redundancy pay?
Ok, but do i need to serve the full 4-week period in case I refuse the offer or if I find another job externally? Does that make me lose the redundancy pay rights?
Ok, but do i need to serve the full 4-week period in case I refuse the offer or if I find another job externally? Does that make me lose the redundancy pay rights? Also the minimum pay is 1 week for each year served, however banks tend to pay more 'generally'. Do you know why would that be the case? Is it generally to avoid lawsuits? Also, let's say if I don't get a pay rise in the year I was made redundant basically given that I was going to be made redundant, should that be factored into redundancy pay estimate? What factors affect any other enhancement if not stated in the contract explicitly? thanks
thanks, XXXXX XXXXX if I find another job and ask to be released then the only way I will lose my redundancy pay if I have to reject a suitable offer in the process?
that is correct. An employee who has been given formal notice of redundancy may want to leave before their notice period expires, for example, because they have found a new job. In this case, the employee can give written counter-notice to their employer to terminate their employment on an earlier date. This is a right given under section 136(3), Employment Rights Act 1996.
If the employee serves counter-notice as required above and the employer either accepts this notice or does nothing, the employee will be dismissed on the date specified in their counter-notice (in other words they will finish early as they had requested) and will still be entitled to receive a statutory redundancy payment. However, if the employer refuses the employee's request, the employee will be entitled to apply to an employment tribunal for an "appropriate payment" (that being the whole of the redundancy payment the employee would have been entitled to, or part of it). In deciding whether to order such a payment, the tribunal will consider whether it was reasonable for the employee to receive a payment given both the reasons the employee had for wishing to leave their employment early and the reasons the employer had for requiring them to remain until the expiry of their notice period.
I would be grateful if you could please take a second to leave a positive rating - your question will not close and I can continue providing further advice if necessary. Thank you
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).