Recent Feedback
I work for a national bank and until recently dealt with complaints about mortgages and was a level d. I have prpfessional qualifacations enabling me to do this.Th bank have moved all complaints about mortgages to England and as our jobs no longer exist they have demoted us to level c and we are dealing with complaints about another product.Our salaries are protected and our holidays are protected for this year and next after which we will lose 2 days annual holiday.We will also lose our free Bupa and will now have to pay for this.They say they have given us a job and t herefore we are not redundant. Is this correct and can they do this?Thanks
Optional Information: Province/Country relating to question: Scotland Already Tried: nothing yet
Hello and thank you for your question, which I will be happy to assist you with. Please let me know how long have you worked there for?
45 years
Hi Ben
Hi ben I have worked there for 45 years
ok thanks and how significant are the differences between the two jobs?
The new job is not as taxing on the brain or as interesting. The main concern is that after 45 years to be demoted like this is a bit of a slap in the face. I was off ill at the time and just received a call to tell me.
I should have mentioned that when I say our salaries are protected we will not get any payrises until we fall into the salary scale for the lower grade, which could take aboout 5 years.
ok let me get my advice ready please
As your job no longer exists this is really a redundancy situation. When a redundancy situation arises, an employer has a duty to search for and offer the affected employees suitable alternative employment (“SAE”) in order to avoid having to make them redundant. This could be a job within the same company or any associated companies.
If an employee accepts the offer of SAE, then they will be treated as not having been dismissed, their employment will continue in the new position and they would lose their entitlement to a redundancy payment.
If they refuse the offer of SAE, they would only lose their entitlement to redundancy pay if it is deemed that the offer was suitable for them and their refusal was unreasonable. However, if the offer was unsuitable and the refusal was reasonable, they would keep their entitlement to redundancy pay and could still opt for redundancy.
The factors that would make an offer unsuitable or a refusal reasonable are as follows:
If the employer offers alternative employment the employee has the right to a 4-week trial period in that job, which can be extended by mutual consent. If during or after the trial period they decide against taking the job then they should tell their employer. This will not affect their employment rights, including their right to statutory redundancy pay.
So as you can see there are a number of factors that would make an alternative offer unsuitable, in which case it can be rejected and a claim made for redundancy pay instead. It is of course up to the individual employee to consider whether they wish to accept the offer or reject it but the above are the basic principles taken into account in such situations.
So there is an argument that the job you have been offered does not amount to SAE and as such you can consider rejecting it and asking for redundancy instead.
Thanks Ben that is very helful
Experience: Expert in UK Employment Law