My base is location is where they are trying to make me work. However they have decided that if you take a role you are not able to take it up if you are over 75 mins away. I was unable to be identified to my role when it moved location as the 75 minute rule applied. However they are now saying I must work at my contratual location and have decided that the 75 minute rule does not apply. The 75 minute rule was devloped as they argue they have a duty of care for employees wellbeing. I believe I can argue that because they have decided that I cant apply for roles over 75 mins (their arguement related to thier duty of care) I believe I can also say that over 75 mins is too much travel and it goes against thier duty of care as an employer. It is actually quite barmy as I am displaced and expect to be made redundant in the next few weeks. I cannot apply for roles in my contratual location because of the 75 min rule. I am looking to redundancy and I really do not want to have to travel to a location that they decided was too far away (when it suits). So I suppose my query is can I argue that the journey is too far by thier own standards and that I find it tiring and stress full and that they have a duty to minimise this.