UK Employment Law
Ask an UK Employment Law Question, Get an Answer ASAP!
What would the tribunal claim be for?
I will be claiming constructive dismissal. My reason for leaving was the continued lack of management action to address the breach of trust and confidence over a number of safety issues which I raised and found to be to my detriment.
Apologies for slight delay. One more question - what exactly did you record?
Good question, now it get complicated. I understand that I can record a conversation without consent providing its for my own use and providing I don't share the information with a third party and as this is a particularly sensitive matter I guess I do have to be somewhat careful. I believe I can say that it was a conversation of a meeting I had with management which although was minuted by a third person the wording was not in managements version of the minutes and my version is not agreed by management.
Whether the recording is illegal depends on what the contents of the conversation were. The Data Protection Act will only apply in situations involving processing of personal information. If you have recorded anything that involves sensitive personal information about other people then you may have to act within DPA principles. But if the information is to be used for litigation purposes' then there is an exemption from the DPA and it would not apply.
I would however bring your attention to the case of Dogherty v Chairman and Governors of Amwell School. Mrs Dogherty made a claim for unfair dismissal, and, in the course of the case, it emerged that she had made a secret recording of both the "open" disciplinary meeting and the "private" appeal meeting. Her contract of employment did not expressly forbid covert recordings of meetings.
She won her case, but the school appealed on the grounds that the secret recording infringed the human rights of the school governors present at the meeting.
The EAT rejected the appeal, finding that the central issue, as least as far as the "open" meeting was concerned, was whether the content of the tape was relevant to Mrs Dogherty's claim. It was, so this section of the tape was allowed as evidence.
However, the "private" section of the recording was ruled to be inadmissible as evidence. As this portion of the tape was a full and frank exchange of views between the governors themselves and was conducted in private, it was not directly relevant to the way in which Mrs Dogherty had been treated in the way that the open meeting had been.
As this is an EAT decision, the tribunal would be bound by it so it is worth thinking about whether your particular situation would be covered by the above.
I hope this helps.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).