How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask UK-Justice Your Own Question
UK-Justice
UK-Justice, Barrister
Category: UK Bankruptcy Law
Satisfied Customers: 16193
Experience:  Called to the Bar in 2007
41133288
Type Your UK Bankruptcy Law Question Here...
UK-Justice is online now
A new question is answered every 9 seconds

I recently filed a claim under section 75 of the Consumer Credit

This answer was rated:

I recently filed a claim under section 75 of the Consumer Credit Act against my credit card company for a payment I made to a car clamping firm. I have previously been succesful in issuing a warrant of execution to the firm as my claim against them was ruled in my favour. As they have recently gone into liquidation my only recourse was to try and claim the money back from the credit card company as I was informed by another expert that they will be jointly liable.

However, the credit card company are refusing to accept any liability as they claim there is no contract or misrepresentation. Could you please advise me on how to proceed?
Thanks for your question. Please remember to rate my answer SMILEY FACE OR ABOVE so that I am credited for my time.

On what basis would you have claimed against the clampers?
Customer: replied 4 years ago.
Hi, thanks for the reply. The original claim against the clampers was that there were no clear signs within the vicinity of the vehicle (three car lengths). The company belonged to the British parking association and were subject to its code of conduct. This claim was ruled in my favour, but the company have gone into liquidation.
So it would be on the basis they breached the recognised regulations for parking and enforcement - is that right?
Customer: replied 4 years ago.
Yes that is right. Thanks
Thanks.

Then your card company are jointly liable under the Consumer Credit Act.

You have to sue them on the same grounds as you would the clamper.

It makes no difference if there was no contract or misrepresentation.

You re bringing the claim on the same grounds.

Therefore you can proceed as you would as if you brought a claim against the clamping company.

I hope this helps.



Please remember to click *** OK SERVICE *** or above so that I am credited for my time. The question does not close and you can ask follow ups.

Important: If you feel the need to rate as one of the lower two scores, it counts as negative feedback so please reply to me via the REPLY with any further questions you may have. I will be happy to assist you further.
UK-Justice and other UK Bankruptcy Law Specialists are ready to help you
Customer: replied 4 years ago.
Thanks for your reply - I have already added a smiley face :). Could you please point me to where in the Consumer Credit act it states (or implies) it makes no difference if there is no contract or misrepresentation.

I believe the credit card company are referring to section 75 which states (as I'm sure you know):

"If the debtor under a debtor-creditor-supplier agreement falling within section 12(b) or (c) has, in relation to a transaction financed by the agreement, any claim against the supplier in respect of a misrepresentation or breach of contract, he shall have a like claim against the creditor, who, with the supplier, shall accordingly be jointly and severally liable to the debtor."

If you can point me to the relevant section that will be very useful in my claim.

Many thanks in advance.
There is a breach because there is a contract to park.

You can tie it all in.

That contract to park has been breached.



Please remember to click *** OK SERVICE *** or above so that I am credited for my time. The question does not close and you can ask follow ups.

Important: If you feel the need to rate as one of the lower two scores, it counts as negative feedback so please reply to me via the REPLY with any further questions you may have. I will be happy to assist you further.
I'm just following up with you to see how everything is going. Did my answer help?

UK-Justice
Customer: replied 4 years ago.
Hi thanks for the follow up and happy new year. I have informed the credit card company that I shall be taking this up with the financial ombudsman. They do not accept that there was an implied contract as there was no offer or acceptance of an offer. Therefore they believe section 75 does not apply.
Thanks for the update - good luck with this.


Please remember to click *** OK SERVICE *** or above so that I am credited for my time. The question does not close and you can ask follow ups.

Important: If you feel the need to rate as one of the lower two scores, it counts as negative feedback so please reply to me via the REPLY with any further questions you may have. I will be happy to assist you further.

Related UK Bankruptcy Law Questions