Thank you for your question. Please permit me to assist you. I also happen to be a licensed New Jersey professional
Are you currently online with me?
I am online now.
Great, welcome back. You were asking about additional costs.
That was part of it, yes.
Typically those costs are fees to local emergency associations, police departments, and so forth.
While a fine itself may be $100, the additional various additional costs typically bump up the fine another $100-$200 in such additional costs.
This is why seeing a citation fine amount is somewhat confusing and potentially incorrect--those other fees are likewise included in a conviction.
Does that make sense?
Yes, I understand that. I was told to pay 639 to the city court. After looking around online, I found that the fine, is supposed to be max of 156. Then a 250 surcharge plus court fees of on average 33. That only adds up to 439.
Then there are police association 'fees', local costs to go toward EMT and other emergency services, and other fines. That is what turns almost any fine into a bloated mess.
Such fees are typically based on percentage of the cost of the fine, so the larger the 'base' fine, the larger the amount of such fees that are attached to the initial citation
each county and each township may have their own additional costs that were put in place by legislation.
Such costs are typically defined on your citation as it has a breakdown of what the costs are that the courts require from the citation.
Alright. I guess that makes sense. I was wondering also exactly what "unsafe operation" is. It appears to be a division of careless driving and really seems like its pretty much the exact same thing, just that they don't tack points on to my license. Is that accurate.?
That is about right. There are two standards of such driving, 'reckless' and 'careless'. The former is the far more serious of the two.
Both indicate negligence but the former has points and heavier fines associated with it.
With you being licensed in New Jersey, from any of your experiences, is that the best I'm likely to get is that plea bargain?
I'm just trying to do whatever I can to keep my job.
If I may ask, what other points or convictions do you have on your record?
Last moving violation that I got that's on my record was back in 2008.
There is an accident from 2011 and now the accident that I was cited for careless driving.
This then appears to be a fairly good option. The $250 payment is something you can take only every et amount of years, and is the first thing the prosecutors offer.
It happens to be a great option if all you want to focus on are not keeping points on your record.
If the courts agree to drop your careless to a speeding (which is possible), that would be the most ideal option, and something your attorney might be able to accomplish for you.
My biggest concern is not the points, it's keeping my job.
Careless or reckless driving are automatic termination offenses. And unsafe appears to be the same thing.
unsafe is similar, I agree
But it is a matter of degree
that is something you would need to explain to your employer if convicted
The officer gave me the ticket because I was trying to go around a bridge that said it was too low for my truck to fit. I thought the sign said the street I took was the one I was supposed to use to go around it, but there were too many cars on the road and I couldn't make a turn which forced me onto a residential street with a sign saying no trucks and another car was there and I scraped a fence with my trailer. Just because of the 'no trucks' sign, he gave me a careless driving ticket.
'unsafe driving' may be improper change of lanes or not maintaining distance (for example), while 'reckless' is driving 40 miles above the limit and potentially causing an accident
that is really the difference
He actually didn't even see me do anything, as I was parked waiting for them to come make a report.
I understand I would need to speak with the company and you can't speak on their behalf, I'm just trying to get as much information before I inform them.
he was right--you were essentially failing to follow the limits of the road signs. That is careless--it is a far less serious offense than reckless but is the correct citation.
sure thing, that is why I am here--to clarify
Even though I was trying to avoid a collision with a bridge, it's still careless? The sign prohibiting trucks was on the next block from where I turned.
yes, it is. you were on a road you were not supposed to be on. That is sufficient, regardless of the main reason
Okay, I understand.
traffic offenses are generally 'strict liability' offenses
what that means is that intent to break the law is not required to show a violation.
What do you mean by that?
going 56 in a 55 is a violation even if it was due to a gust of wind when you were going downhill
that is still technically a violation even there was no intent to speed
all the officer has to show that you were going 56, and that is enough
Or, in my case, just see that a truck was on a road with a posted prohibition... Fair enough, I suppose.
So you said it was possible that they may change it again to speeding instead? Is it likely at all/
well, the latter is based on the attorney you have and his ability to speak with the prosecutor
the other party may choose to drop the citation or agree to a different citation--it all depends on how the prosecutor is willing to negotiate.
I cannot promise but it is possible.
Hope that helps and good luck to you.
Alright, thank you for your time.
You are most welcome, hope I was able to assist
If satisfied with my information, kindly do not forget to positively rate my answers so that I can obtain credit for my work. Thank you!
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).