How JustAnswer Works:

  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.

Ask Brandon M. Your Own Question

Brandon M.
Brandon M., Counselor at Law
Category: Traffic Law
Satisfied Customers: 12237
Experience:  Licensed Attorney
Type Your Traffic Law Question Here...
Brandon M. is online now
A new question is answered every 9 seconds

I, too, received a red light ticket at Wilshire Blvd. & Whittier

Resolved Question:

I, too, received a red light ticket at Wilshire Blvd. & Whittier in Beverly Hills. They are VERY aggressive in enforcing in Beverly Hills and will certainly send me to "collection" if I ignore the ticket. I was told I could make an appearance by "Declaration." What would I need to say to get the ticket dismissed outright?
Submitted: 2 years ago.
Category: Traffic Law
Expert:  Brandon M. replied 2 years ago.
Hello there:

Thank you for your question. The answer would actually depend on your circumstances. The first thing I would ask is whether, regardless of what the evidence shows, you believe you are factually innocent and why?
Customer: replied 2 years ago.

First, if all other red light cameras in Los Angeles County were turned off, I believe that it is discriminatory for Beverly Hills to keep theirs active.


That aside, when the light turned yellow I believed that I still had time to stop, which I attempted to do. When I realized that I would end up stopping in the middle of the intersection, I had a split second decision to make . . . slam harder on my brakes and send my 90 year old mother into the windshield, or attempt to make it across the intersection on the yellow. Unfortunately, the yellow light was so short that I didn't have adequate time to clear the intersection.

Expert:  Brandon M. replied 2 years ago.
Thank you for that information. The question was how to get the ticket dismissed outright. For any traffic infraction, the burden of proof is on the state to prove guilt. So, for any given case, it's possible that a defendant could literally say nothing and have the ticket dismissed if the state's evidence isn't sufficiently persuasive. Naturally, every case is going to be different, so I am not suggesting that this or any other defense is necessarily right or wrong for you.

A discrimination defense would be without merit, first because Beverly Hills has the right to enforce the laws on the books even if other jurisdictions do not, and second because discrimination in law enforcement matters itself is not illegal---it is only illegal in certain circumstances, such as situations involving discriminating based on race, color, religion, ethnicity, gender, etc. The penal code discriminates against criminals. It is not illegally discriminatory for a city to enforce state law simply because others do not.

That said, not being able to stop safely generally is a valid defense to a failure to stop citation. If an intersection traffic signal is timed in a way that a driver can't stop safely, or if traffic conditions are such that a driver (through no fault of his own) , then there is a factual basis for acquittal. The law generally does not force the choice of either getting injured or getting a ticket (fortunately).

How to defend yourself is up to you, but I will alert you that it is usually a mistake to fight a ticket in writing if you can appear in person. A judge can ask questions and details can be explained in person, plus there is just a human aspect of dealing with someone in person that isn't achieved in writing, especially when the judge reviewing the written defenses is pouring over dozens per day, many appearing identical. I'm certainly not saying that a written declaration isn't a valid option or that it won't be successful, but consider a personal appearance if that is an option for you.
Customer: replied 2 years ago.
Relist: Answer quality.
I contacted your site after having researched many other sites that offer this type of assistance. On every other site I contacted they offered to provide language for a "trial by declaration." This option relieves the person who received the ticket the burden of having to make an appearance in person. The success rates of this form of "appearance" is reported at between 80-90%. If the judge accepts the "language" in the declaration then you have no further obligation of any kind. If the judge rules against the "declaration," you lose nothing and can still appeal to make an in-person appearance and have your trial in front of a judge.

I know that there is language to put in the declaration that in 80-90% of the cases almost guarantees a result of dismissal of the ticket. I specifically asked for this language (which seems to be widely known to other websites) and instead received a rather vague explanation of the law and was urged to appear in person in court.

I KNEW THAT MUCH MYSELF BEFORE I CONTACTED YOUR SITE! So the response I received was of NO help to me.

So unless someone else can answer my SPECIFIC question and provide the language I am seeking, I DO NOT WANT TO BE BILLED FOR THIS SERVICE.
Expert:  Brandon M. replied 2 years ago.
I'm sorry that you were not happy with the information I provided, but I assure you that trial by declarations, even with legal guidance or magic language, yield an unfavorable result in over 90% of traffic disputes. Don't take my word for it--get a second opinion from any attorney anywhere in the state. Please feel free to come back to report your results.

The accusal that my explanation was vague is inaccurate-- it's almost never possible to give someone exactly what they are looking for without further discussion, and you are always invited to ask for any clarification that might be needed. Everyone's needs are different, and I did not consider the conversation complete.

Finally, I respectfully XXXXX XXXXX no information of value was passed: trial by declaration is the least successful option for a traffic dispute, and there is no magic boilerplate language that will result in a favorable outcome for any given case. You are certainly welcome to continue working with the information that you have and rejecting what I have given you, but I recommend that you get a second opinion before relying on a website offering to draft language with a 80%+ success rate. I would even be wary of providing my credit card information to anyone making those kinds of claims. Again, I invite you to come back and report your results. Best of luck.
Expert:  Brandon M. replied 2 years ago.
One last point--upon re-reading your posting, it occurred to me that you were explaining the trial by declaration process as a "nothing to lose by trying" option. That's a valid perspective, but one that isn't necessarily shared among attorneys for any particular case. You can view it as a safety net, but if you're serious about winning then you will usually not commit yourself to statements made in a declaration prior to trial. Good attorneys can disagree on this for any given case because it is a question of strategy. I now must discontinue my involvement with this conversation. Let me know how that language almost guaranteeing a favorable result works out. I wish you the best.
Brandon M., Counselor at Law
Category: Traffic Law
Satisfied Customers: 12237
Experience: Licensed Attorney
Brandon M. and other Traffic Law Specialists are ready to help you
Customer: replied 2 years ago.

Thank you, XXXXX XXXXX your follow-up response. Your advice about "not committing to statements in a declaration prior to trial" made sense, and I appreciate being reminded of that. Since time was running out on the 23rd to make an appearance on the ticket, I asked for an arraignment in person because I could avoid paying the humungous bail in advance doing it that way. I will take my chances with a trial in person as you suggested.

JustAnswer in the News:

Ask-a-doc Web sites: If you've got a quick question, you can try to get an answer from sites that say they have various specialists on hand to give quick answers... seen a spike since October in legal questions from readers about layoffs, unemployment and severance.
Web sites like
...leave nothing to chance.
Traffic on JustAnswer rose 14 percent...and had nearly 400,000 page views in 30 days...inquiries related to stress, high blood pressure, drinking and heart pain jumped 33 percent.
Tory Johnson, GMA Workplace Contributor, discusses work-from-home jobs, such as JustAnswer in which verified Experts answer people’s questions.
I will tell you that...the things you have to go through to be an Expert are quite rigorous.

What Customers are Saying:

  • Mr. Kaplun clearly had an exceptional understanding of the issue and was able to explain it concisely. I would recommend JustAnswer to anyone. Great service that lives up to its promises! Gary B. Edmond, OK
< Previous | Next >
  • Mr. Kaplun clearly had an exceptional understanding of the issue and was able to explain it concisely. I would recommend JustAnswer to anyone. Great service that lives up to its promises! Gary B. Edmond, OK
  • My Expert was fast and seemed to have the answer to my taser question at the tips of her fingers. Communication was excellent. I left feeling confident in her answer. Eric Redwood City, CA
  • I am very pleased with JustAnswer as a place to go for divorce or criminal law knowledge and insight. Michael Wichita, KS
  • PaulMJD helped me with questions I had regarding an urgent legal matter. His answers were excellent. Three H. Houston, TX
  • Anne was extremely helpful. Her information put me in the right direction for action that kept me legal, possible saving me a ton of money in the future. Thank you again, Anne!! Elaine Atlanta, GA
  • It worked great. I had the facts and I presented them to my ex-landlord and she folded and returned my deposit. The 50 bucks I spent with you solved my problem. Tony Apopka, FL
  • Wonderful service, prompt, efficient, and accurate. Couldn't have asked for more. I cannot thank you enough for your help. Mary C. Freshfield, Liverpool, UK

Meet The Experts:

  • Dimitry K., Esq.


    Satisfied Customers:

    Run my own practice.
< Last | Next >
  • Dimitry K., Esq.'s Avatar

    Dimitry K., Esq.


    Satisfied Customers:

    Run my own practice.
  • Ely's Avatar



    Satisfied Customers:

    Private practice
  • Marsha411JD's Avatar



    Satisfied Customers:

    Licensed Attorney with 29 yrs. exp. with Traffic Law issues
  • LawTalk's Avatar



    Satisfied Customers:

    I have 30 years experience in the practice of law, including representation of clients in Traffic Court.
  • Tina's Avatar



    Satisfied Customers:

    JD, 17 year experience including traffic law.
  • Brandon M.'s Avatar

    Brandon M.

    Counselor at Law

    Satisfied Customers:

    Licensed Attorney
  • SoloLawyer's Avatar



    Satisfied Customers:

    I help clients deal with traffic tickets on a weekly basis.