Certiorari is filed at the Supreme Court in, response was
Certiorari is filed at the Supreme Court in Washington, response was due for the Solicitor General but instead he waived his rights. Petitioner filed motion on default since the SG waived his rights, what will happen next?
This question deal with a Writ of Mandamus. Does the Federal
This question deal with a Writ of Mandamus. Does the Federal District Court have the authority to tell the IRS Whistleblower Office. which is a department of the IRS, to perform its duties and collect taxes.28 U.S. Code § 1361 - Action to compel an officer of the United States to perform his duty28 U.S. Code § 1331- Federal question"The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of all civil actions arising under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States”I also need the case where a whistleblower went to the Supreme Court to make the tax court perform its responsibilities and was denied a hearing. I need case law showing the district court has ordered Federal employees to do their job.
Civil law question. Challenging divorce final judgment that's
Civil law question. Challenging divorce final judgment that's almost 10 years old. I know that's virtually impossible. But, my case is quite unique. Anyway, just had hearing, presented concrete evidence original judgment violated Federal, State, and Constitutional law rendering it Void about Initio.No question, ton of Case law to back it up. This Judge is a prejudicial bigot against men and the disabled(me on both counts). She ruled against accepted Common law, total abuse of Discretion. Should I file Writ of Certiorari with the Chief Judge of Circuit or with Court of Appeals? This Judge obviously has some type of deal/friendship/whatever with ex's attorney. Her ruling is illogical, no legal basis. Have filed 3 JQC complaints against her so far. Can I contact Fl. Supreme Court? This woman is a menace.
As Pro Se have decided that I will need to in 90 days either
As Pro Se have decided that I will need to in 90 days either appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States, so that my constitutional and/or civil rights are not affected according to Title VII and Title VIII using one of the two methods being: 1.) Writ of Certiorari or 2.) From an en banc JUDGMENT of USCA.On January 15, 2015 my case regarding an abuse of discretion based upon clear error and recusal was dismissed in the USCA, even though my state court case has tremendous merit according to two(2) state court judges as documented and Congress has created a HR bill; namely, H.R. 1706 (2013 -2014) demanding transparency from banks the USCA's initial panel simply referred back to the USDC's ruling in spite of overwhelming evidence submitted/filed in USDC is missing voluminous records from ECF and the USDC negated to fully examine the other parties lack of standing and/or capacity issues as it relates specifically to state and federal laws, as well as, clear delineations of SEC violations although my case primarily focused upon whether disparate impact claims are cognizable and 24 C.F.R. 100.120, 100.125 based upon the Appellees being servicers pursuant to U.S. Code Title 12; Banks and Banking PART 226 – TRUTH IN LENDING (“REGULATION Z”) and TITLE 26, Subtitle A, Chapter 1 Subchapter M, Part II, §§ 850-862. (Note: In state court the Appellees have already been deemed not the parties of interest, lacked standing and capacity to foreclose. Likewise, upon investigation with the SEC none of the parties in this instant matter have standing or capacity, but names the proper party.)My very serious concerns are that on or about March 15, 2015 my constitutional and/or civil rights could be forfeited in the Supreme Court of the United States based upon the lack of timeliness should I wait for the USCA to accept my timely filing of the Petition for Rehearing En Banc and to grant my motion as such.In fact, recently I received on order from the Clerk of the Court that stated my motion to file a late petition for rehearing en banc is denied as unnecessary because the Court was closed due to poor weather conditions, the deadline was extended until January 28, 2015. See Fed. R. App. P. 26(a)(A). Accordingly, my petition for rehearing en banc on January 28, 2015, is timely.What I would like to know is based upon the Clerk's Statement my petition for rehearing en banc has been accepted without any defects and that a judge or judges shall be required to either accept or deny the petition, so that either I shall be able to receive an order granting or denying the petition and at that time I shall be able to have the case proceed in USCA and/or timely file a Writ of Certiorari or From an en banc JUDGMENT of USCA based upon the Court's order given at the time? Also, based upon the above information if the conditions are necessary I would like to known should I my case in the Supreme Court of the United States under a Writ of Certiorari or From an en banc JUDGMENT of USCA?
I recieved a order of suspension from State of Florida dept
I recieved a order of suspension from State of Florida dept of safety and motor vehicle for 1/20/14. The cause is failure to comply with child support. I had prevoiusly gone to seminole county 6 months ago for the same thing and i informed them that my daughter has been living with me since 2011 and the order was put in 2010 in New York. I never was notified that she did this. They said i need to get the case transfered to fl .the dept of revenue informed today that it is florida now. They told me to file a motion to suspend child support and change of custody and then i needed to file petition to contest dl suspension and take that petition to child support offices in Sanford .on the bottom of the order of suspension it says i can ask for a petition for writ of certiorari within 30 days and that i may request a hearing at any administrative reviews office. My question is there any way i can stop them from suspending my license .I have school records to show that she was living in tampa with me. Please help!
a defendant tricked the court into ruling under title vii
a defendant tricked the court into ruling under title vii where it had 11th amendment immunity instead of title vi where it didn't. the matter is now in the supreme court and they denied the writ of certiorari without explanation. how do I respond in mypetition for rehearing. also, it may be possible this is not the first time this trick was played. are there other cases where this has happen.