Question just for Ray: Under FL civil law, if a County Court
Question just for Ray: Under FL civil law, if a County Court (not small claims) dismisses an individual officer from a corporate complaint upon motion by the Defense; and then grants Plaintiff's motion to reconsider that ruling, but upholds it after a hearing for reconsideration whereby it would presumably become "final"; what affect would still ongoing depositions have, if any, on a motion for leave to amend with an amended complaint to reinstate the defendant based upon evidence from the depositions AFTER the court's original ruling, and its reconsideration of that ruling? Simply; would the only way to reinstate be to appeal that ruling, or can the lower court reverse based upon a motion to admit the new evidence, and avoid the appeal?
I am looking for the rule on case numbers in tx. a writ
I am looking for the rule on case numbers in tx. a writ certiorari was granted to the applicant against me. the basis of the decision by the judge was that the format of the case number ***** have been in correct but, no one had the rule of the cause number. I had 41 judgements against the defendant in justice court. the defendant says that the court was wrong in the total amount of the judgements. the judgements were filed separately but the cause number were example cv9241-01, cv9241-02, cv9241-03. the judge in justice court obtained a legal opinion and said it was correct and it docketed that wayJA: Because laws vary from place to place, can you tell me what state this is in?Customer: it was in Zavala county , TexasJA: Has anything been filed or reported?Customer: I do not understand the question. I did receive 41 default judgements against the defendant and, their motion for new trial was denied and the time for an appeal had passed which is why the defendant filed a writ of certiorari. a hearing was scheduled for yesterday and the judge granted the writ to the applicant. the applicant has not posted bond as of yesterday afternoon .JA: Anything else you want the lawyer to know before I connect you?Customer: I think that's it
Certiorari is filed at the Supreme Court in, response was
Certiorari is filed at the Supreme Court in Washington, response was due for the Solicitor General but instead he waived his rights. Petitioner filed motion on default since the SG waived his rights, what will happen next?
This question deal with a Writ of Mandamus. Does the Federal
This question deal with a Writ of Mandamus. Does the Federal District Court have the authority to tell the IRS Whistleblower Office. which is a department of the IRS, to perform its duties and collect taxes.28 U.S. Code § 1361 - Action to compel an officer of the United States to perform his duty28 U.S. Code § 1331- Federal question"The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of all civil actions arising under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States”I also need the case where a whistleblower went to the Supreme Court to make the tax court perform its responsibilities and was denied a hearing. I need case law showing the district court has ordered Federal employees to do their job.
Civil law question. Challenging divorce final judgment that's
Civil law question. Challenging divorce final judgment that's almost 10 years old. I know that's virtually impossible. But, my case is quite unique. Anyway, just had hearing, presented concrete evidence original judgment violated Federal, State, and Constitutional law rendering it Void about Initio.No question, ton of Case law to back it up. This Judge is a prejudicial bigot against men and the disabled(me on both counts). She ruled against accepted Common law, total abuse of Discretion. Should I file Writ of Certiorari with the Chief Judge of Circuit or with Court of Appeals? This Judge obviously has some type of deal/friendship/whatever with ex's attorney. Her ruling is illogical, no legal basis. Have filed 3 JQC complaints against her so far. Can I contact Fl. Supreme Court? This woman is a menace.
As Pro Se have decided that I will need to in 90 days either
As Pro Se have decided that I will need to in 90 days either appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States, so that my constitutional and/or civil rights are not affected according to Title VII and Title VIII using one of the two methods being: 1.) Writ of Certiorari or 2.) From an en banc JUDGMENT of USCA.On January 15, 2015 my case regarding an abuse of discretion based upon clear error and recusal was dismissed in the USCA, even though my state court case has tremendous merit according to two(2) state court judges as documented and Congress has created a HR bill; namely, H.R. 1706 (2013 -2014) demanding transparency from banks the USCA's initial panel simply referred back to the USDC's ruling in spite of overwhelming evidence submitted/filed in USDC is missing voluminous records from ECF and the USDC negated to fully examine the other parties lack of standing and/or capacity issues as it relates specifically to state and federal laws, as well as, clear delineations of SEC violations although my case primarily focused upon whether disparate impact claims are cognizable and 24 C.F.R. 100.120, 100.125 based upon the Appellees being servicers pursuant to U.S. Code Title 12; Banks and Banking PART 226 – TRUTH IN LENDING (“REGULATION Z”) and TITLE 26, Subtitle A, Chapter 1 Subchapter M, Part II, §§ 850-862. (Note: In state court the Appellees have already been deemed not the parties of interest, lacked standing and capacity to foreclose. Likewise, upon investigation with the SEC none of the parties in this instant matter have standing or capacity, but names the proper party.)My very serious concerns are that on or about March 15, 2015 my constitutional and/or civil rights could be forfeited in the Supreme Court of the United States based upon the lack of timeliness should I wait for the USCA to accept my timely filing of the Petition for Rehearing En Banc and to grant my motion as such.In fact, recently I received on order from the Clerk of the Court that stated my motion to file a late petition for rehearing en banc is denied as unnecessary because the Court was closed due to poor weather conditions, the deadline was extended until January 28, 2015. See Fed. R. App. P. 26(a)(A). Accordingly, my petition for rehearing en banc on January 28, 2015, is timely.What I would like to know is based upon the Clerk's Statement my petition for rehearing en banc has been accepted without any defects and that a judge or judges shall be required to either accept or deny the petition, so that either I shall be able to receive an order granting or denying the petition and at that time I shall be able to have the case proceed in USCA and/or timely file a Writ of Certiorari or From an en banc JUDGMENT of USCA based upon the Court's order given at the time? Also, based upon the above information if the conditions are necessary I would like to known should I my case in the Supreme Court of the United States under a Writ of Certiorari or From an en banc JUDGMENT of USCA?