Question: My step son has a UTMA account set up by his
Question: My step son has a UTMA account set up by his biological mother that my husband and I just became aware of. As we live in Iowa, my step son will not have control over this account until he is 21. The issue is that at age 18, he decided not to live with his mother even for the "bare minimum" that we mandated until he turned 18.1. At 18, even though he cannot make withdrawals from this account, does he have the legal right to know what is in that account and what transactions are being made?2. When it comes time to look at college expenses next year, Iowa has a 1/3, 1/3, 1/3 payment thing for college. Do these funds count as her 1/3?3. Since she is custodian of the account and has had a toxic and manipulative relationship with my step-son, can she refuse to pay for college expenses?She has already picked an account type which will negatively impact his opportunities for financial aid. I am concerned that she has set up the account and will provide little to no information and then use this as another manipulative tool to "force" him to spend time with her--in effect holding the funds "hostage".
I paid the minimal fee to an attorney in April to contact
I paid the minimal fee to an attorney in April to contact the IRS to attempt to remove a tax lien connected to my property that actually belonged to my ex husband. They said they would send a letter out that week. A week later they called to obtain more information, which I provided immediately. They said they would send the letter out that week and would send me a copy. I waited two weeks but when I had not received anything I contacted them again and received a email response asking when I wanted them to send out the appeal letter. I responded "immediately". I then received a copyof the letter on May 12 th. I waited until June before emailing them to ask if they had heard anything and received an email response that an IRS person had called and left a message for them to call. They said they attempted to call but did not reach them. I waited until July and had no further communication from them. I then contacted the IRS myself only to find that the lien had been paid off by my ex husband back in April and obtained a copy of the release myself. At that point I emailed the attorney to say that I was extremely dissatisfied with their representation and would like at least part of my $1,000 back. I received an email from the attorney's partner saying the attorney was "on vacation" and they would discuss it upon his return and address it with me by mid-August. I have received no contact and have emailed several times asking. What is your opinion? Should I complain to the bar association or does this lack of representation still require my "minimum fee"?
Texas Law Question re judgments: (hanky-panky against me) 1.
Texas Law Question re judgments: (hanky-panky against me)1. WHO ELSE, if anyone, besides a “judgment creditor”, as defined below – is entitled to “aid from a court”?2. DOES “aid from a court” – essentially mean having the court do “execution”, i.e. via sheriff or such, or other pressure by the court?3. AND PARTICULARLY, what does “other judgment creditor” (as used in below definition) mean or refer to. Does that refer to “by assignment of judgment” – i. e. “standing in the shoes of” – an original judgment creditor – or a prior “assignee” judgment creditor?4. Again, ANYONE ELSE, entitled to “aid from a court”, besides a “judgment creditor”, as defined below?5. Someone is telling the court, that they are “successor in interest of a final judgment rendered in favor of a Law Office, P.C. – a 9 year ago forfeited entity (charter forfeited by Secretary of State, never revived, judgment never transferred, i.e. “assigned”). Is there even such a thing as “successor in interest of a final judgment”? – or have to be the actual (current? assigned?) “judgment creditor”, as defined below?The Texas law I found:Sec. 31.002. COLLECTION OF JUDGMENT THROUGH COURT PROCEEDING. (a) A judgment creditor is entitled to aid from a court of appropriate jurisdiction through injunction or other means in order to reach property to obtain satisfaction on the judgment if the judgment debtor owns property, including present or future rights to property, etc.(1) "Judgment creditor" means a party in whose favor a judgment has been rendered, whether a plaintiff, counterclaimant, cross-claimant, third party plaintiff, or other judgment creditor.Udo Birnbaum
I'm a Co-Trustor of my Mother's Trust. I want to sell the
I'm a Co-Trustor of my Mother's Trust. I want to sell the house which I have the authority to do. However, my brother (a beneficiary of the Trust proceeds) believes that I cannot sell without his signature/approval and therefore does not want to leave. He does not pay rent and does not pay the taxes on this property held under the Trust. It is a standard Trust; generic document form. There is no formal definition of a "Beneficiary", only how proceeds will be divided upon the disposal of property assets.Is there a hidden phrase or paragraph I'm not aware of in this Trust in the ten sections that gives a Beneficiary can prevent a sale?Bob
My niece ( I'll call her Gina) lives in Florida, is age 40
My niece ( I'll call her Gina) lives in Florida, is age 40 and disabled with MS and has a daughter(age 10). She is of sound mind though her health is declining and she is depressed. She receives SSA and medical insurance herself and children's benefits and medical insurance for her daughter from Florida.Her mother established a living trust in May 2013 which became a special needs trust for Gina upon the mother's death ( she died 8/26/14). It was the intention of the mother that Gina not lose the disabled benefits she receives thru Florida now or any future disabled benefits she might qualify for from any other government agency. The family attorney set up the trust and the trustee worked in his office--he oversaw the trustee and Gina felt comfortable with this as he was highly regarded by the family.Since the mother's death things gave drastically changed. The attorney got really sick shortly after and died in May 2015. The relationship with the trustee which was cordial has badly deteriorated since the attorneys death. The trustee is in a different office now. There is no communication except by text between parties and often texts are ignored completely. Gina has no idea what is in the trust, if any income is being produced from it or what expenditures have been made by the trustee! The trustee told her by text that there was an $80,000 estate tax bill due.I have been asked by Gina to become her power of attorney and guardian and also to become guardian for the child as Gina's health is declining. I am concerned her best interests are not beingproperly considered! The child is also sick as well now.Questions:How can this be accomplished and what will be my responsibilities assuming I accept?How do we find out what is exactly in the trust?How do we get tax returns and an accounting of the expenditures made from the trust?The mother's house is in the trust but is not on the market for sale or rent. It's been 15 months since the Gina moved out of it and back to her own house. Gina and her child lived there and cared for her ill mother for 3 years before her death. How do we find out what's going on with that?Can someone else be appointed trustee?I regret this is long but I live in NJ and need to help her!
My mother passed away on 4/20/16, she left a house and its
My mother passed away on 4/20/16, she left a house and its contents and a car to me in a trust and a large amount of stock to my daughter who is to receive a sum of money when 18 and the rest when she is 25 year old also in that same trust. She made my uncle first trustee, my aunt second and myself as third trustee. Neither my uncle or aunt will return any phone calls or text. I recently found out that my aunt took all of my mom's jewelry that was promised to my 14 year old daughter. My question..... don't they (1st and 2nd trustees) have to stay in contact with me re: the trust and paying bills i.e medical bills, credit card accounts, etc. I have been getting the run around from the attorney that set up the trust and I keep getting bills for credit cards. Again neither of them will call me back!
Is it possible in a MN unemployment fraud overpayment case
Is it possible in a MN unemployment fraud overpayment case to negotiate to reduce the interest charges ? My principle including the penalty started at about 3 k but now is well over 14 K I would pay an amount close to the 3k immediately to clear this but I can not see me ever managing to pay off the 14k as I am nearly 54 years old at this time and have NO retirement or any nestegg at all.
I was served a libel cease and desist. I informed one member
I was served a libel cease and desist. I informed one member of the Board of my condo ourmanagement company Hoag had its license revoked in 2000 by State Attorney General, whom found $53,000 missingfrom trust funds at the same time our condo had money in trust funds with the mamagement company Hoag. 3 nonlicensed employees of Hoag took money out of trust funds.Theirlicense was reinstated in 2007. I included the full case to the Board member. But, she gave my letterto her to the management company. Now their lawyer is threatening to sue me for libel and I signedhis request not to say anything about the management co (Hoag). I said in my letter to her Hoag admittedto all charges, when in fact they did not admit to anything, but agreed to have license revoked.They signed off on all charges, yet didn't admit to anything.Full case was attached for her to see.Isn't my letter to her privileged ? Is that libel, when letter only given to her ? No malice, no monetary damages.I gave Hoag a cease and desist order for violating my free speech with cases.Lawyer is harassing me because I tried to get Hoag kicked ou of our condo and also via 4 legal agencies got the office manager at Hoag removed. They want revenge.Can I send cease and demand letter for CA PENAL CODE 518,522,523Extorion by force of fear, letter and consent. It is believed by Zaludek, thatunlawful means were used to secure Zaludek's signature on an attempted, or successfulextortion scheme.. I am going on Board now and they want me not to go on.