How JustAnswer Works:

  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
A new question is answered every 9 seconds

Ask a Lawyer

Tina
Tina, Lawyer
Category: General
Satisfied Customers: 8603
Experience:  JD, BBA Over 25 years legal and business experience.
4460311
Type Your Legal Question Here...
characters left:
13 Lawyers are Online Now

JustAnswer in the News:

 
 
 
Ask-a-doc Web sites: If you've got a quick question, you can try to get an answer from sites that say they have various specialists on hand to give quick answers... Justanswer.com.
JustAnswer.com...has seen a spike since October in legal questions from readers about layoffs, unemployment and severance.
Web sites like justanswer.com/legal
...leave nothing to chance.
Traffic on JustAnswer rose 14 percent...and had nearly 400,000 page views in 30 days...inquiries related to stress, high blood pressure, drinking and heart pain jumped 33 percent.
Tory Johnson, GMA Workplace Contributor, discusses work-from-home jobs, such as JustAnswer in which verified Experts answer people’s questions.
I will tell you that...the things you have to go through to be an Expert are quite rigorous.
 
 
 

What Customers are Saying:

 
 
 
  • Mr. Kaplun clearly had an exceptional understanding of the issue and was able to explain it concisely. I would recommend JustAnswer to anyone. Great service that lives up to its promises! Gary B. Edmond, OK
< Last | Next >
  • Mr. Kaplun clearly had an exceptional understanding of the issue and was able to explain it concisely. I would recommend JustAnswer to anyone. Great service that lives up to its promises! Gary B. Edmond, OK
  • My Expert was fast and seemed to have the answer to my taser question at the tips of her fingers. Communication was excellent. I left feeling confident in her answer. Eric Redwood City, CA
  • I am very pleased with JustAnswer as a place to go for divorce or criminal law knowledge and insight. Michael Wichita, KS
  • PaulMJD helped me with questions I had regarding an urgent legal matter. His answers were excellent. Three H. Houston, TX
  • Anne was extremely helpful. Her information put me in the right direction for action that kept me legal, possible saving me a ton of money in the future. Thank you again, Anne!! Elaine Atlanta, GA
  • It worked great. I had the facts and I presented them to my ex-landlord and she folded and returned my deposit. The 50 bucks I spent with you solved my problem. Tony Apopka, FL
  • Not only did he answer my Michigan divorce question but was also able to help me out with it, too. I have since won my legal case on this matter and thank you so much for it. Lee Michigan
 
 
 

Patriot Act Questions

The patriot act is one of the most controversial Acts in US history. The Patriot Act was created to make the detection of potential security threats easier on the US government. The patriot Act was signed into law shortly after the 9/11 terrorist act. While many people argue about the usefulness of the Patriot act, there are those who are unaware of how the Act affects every citizen in the US. To learn more about the Patriot Act, take a look at the questions below regarding the patriot Act that have been answered by Experts.

Does the USA Patriot Act balance liberty with security and is it a necessary law?

The answer to this question would depend on if you are asking a Democrat or a Republican.

Many Democrats and Liberals would agree that the Patriot Act doesn't balance liberty with security and some of them will say that patriot Act is unnecessary. The reason for this belief is that they feel innocent people will be exposed to illegal wiretapping, that unconfirmed terrorist could be held against their will, and that US citizens could lose their citizenship when being suspected of aiding a terrorist group. Another argument is that there is no proof that these methods would reduce the chances of terrorism.

The Republicans and conservatives believe the patriot Act does balance liberty with security. Their argument is, without the patriot Act in place, terrorism would be a heavier threat to the US, and those citizens whose liberty is at stake in that position for a reason. Most people that carry this view believe that protecting the citizens of the United States is more important than the rights of a terrorist. They also believe that if the person is suspected of terrorism, their right to constitutional protection should be removed. Also, they argue that without the Patriot Act, the US would be more vulnerable to terrorist attack.

Is the patriot act contradictory to the constitution? If so, does that not make it null and void and therefore not a real law?

A federal judge found that in order for investigators to order Internet providers to release records without telling the customers, the investigators must first have a court's approval.

The U.S. District Judge Victor Marrero states: the government orders must be subject to meaningful judicial review and that the recently rewritten Patriot Act “offends the fundamental constitutional principles of checks and balances and separation of powers.”

The American Civil Liberties union has also challenged this law stating that the law allowed the FBI to demand records without the documentation that is normally required by other government searches. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) also stated that the FBI improperly used NSLs (National Security Letter) as a tool to manipulate businesses to release customer records without an order from a judge or by a Grand Jury Subpoena.

While there are many people who disagree with the patriot Act, you will have to form your own opinion.

Does the Patriot Act allow a federal government employee access to passwords for internet accounts (i.e. email, Myspace, etc.) of family or friends of someone they are doing a background check on?

The government is only allowed to access the accounts of the person who is being investigated. The only exception to this rule would be if the person being investigated communicates with another person who is also under investigation and the FG (federal government) is trying to cross reference the relationship between the two people who are being investigated. The Patriot Act with then only allow this activity if the government has legal documented proof.

The patriot Act brings about some strong arguments from those who agree with it and those who don't. While some people think it is a necessary evil to protect the US, others feel it is an infringement on their privacy. If you have questions about the Patriot Act, you should ask an Expert for legal insight and answers.

Ask a Lawyer

Tina
Tina, Lawyer
Category: General
Satisfied Customers: 8603
Experience:  JD, BBA Over 25 years legal and business experience.
4460311
Type Your Legal Question Here...
characters left:
13 Lawyers are Online Now

How JustAnswer Works:

  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.

Lawyers are online & ready to help you now

Tina
Lawyer
Satisfied Customers: 8436
JD, BBA Over 25 years legal and business experience.
Ely
Counselor at Law
Satisfied Customers: 19941
Private practice with focus on family, criminal, PI, consumer protection, and business consultation.
FiveStarLaw
Attorney
Satisfied Customers: 8189
25 years of experience helping people like you.

Recent Patriot Act Questions

  • how does the USA Patriot Act invite tension across different

    how does the USA Patriot Act invite tension across different levels of government?
  • I DROPPED MY LAST NAME WHEN I WAS 20 YEARS OLD. THAT WAS OVER

    I DROPPED MY LAST NAME WHEN I WAS 20 YEARS OLD. THAT WAS OVER 40 YEARS AGO. SINCE THEN I'VE USED MY MIDDLE NAME AS MY LAST NAME. MY PASSPORT, DRIVERS LICENSE, SOCIAL SECURITY CARD (EVERYTHING BUT MY BIRTH CERTIFICATE, HS DIPLOMA, AND MILITARY RECORDS) WERE CHANGED. I RECENTLY APPLIED FOR A CCW IN SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY (CA) AND THE SHERIFF'S DEPT IS DEMANDING A COURT DOCUMENT FOR THE NAME CHANGE. MY UNDERSTANDING IS THAT MY CURRENT NAME ISXXXXX AFTER 20 YEARS. ADDITIONALLY, A FRIEND OF MINE APPLIED WITH SIMILAR CIRCUMSTANCES AND THEY DIDN'T REQUIRE THE COURT ORDER. DO I HAVE ANY OPTIONS OTHER THAN GOING TO COUT (A 3 MONTH PROCESS)? THANK YOU!
  • Greetings: I would like to know how Congress can pass a

    Greetings:

    I would like to know how Congress can pass a law that violates or even eliminates our Constitutional rights. I thought no one could take away our Constitutional rights. I realize that the Supreme Court decides how to interpret the Constitution, but I am still confused about this. I am most concerned with the Patriot Act and similar legislation. Thankyou very much!
< Last | Next >
View More Legal Questions