How JustAnswer Works:

  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
A new question is answered every 9 seconds
Ask a Legal question
Type Your Legal Question Here...
characters left:
14 Lawyers are Online Now

Motion for New Trial

What is a motion for new trial?

A new trial may be granted to one or all parties when certain issues or reasons arise for which new trials are authorized by law or a rule of court. When a motion for a new trial is filed, the court may accept and review additional evidence and testimony. Based on this, the court may amend the findings of the court. They may also arrive upon a new conclusion or finding and accordingly pass a new judgment. In order to file a motion for a new trial, it should be made in writing, mentioning the reasons or basis for the motion. Changes may be incorporated prior to the court hearing. Other supporting documents would need to be included with the motion to substantiate the request. After the motion is submitted and if the motion is granted the court will set a date for a new trial. It should be noted a motion for a new trial does not nullify or stop the appellate process. This implies that, in the eventuality of the motion for a new trial being denied, a person can still file a notice of appeal on the old ruling within the prescribed period.

For what reasons and how long after a ruling can one file a motion for a new trial in Arizona?

A motion for a new trial should be filed usually within fifteen days after the judgment. As per the Rule 83 of Arizona Family Court Matters the grounds for granting a motion for new trial are as follows:
  • Irregularity in the court proceedings, wrongdoing, or unfair trial
  • Misdemeanor of a party
  • Accident or surprising events which could not have been predicted or prevented proactively
  • Newly discovered evidence which was elusive before the trial despite due diligence or not produced at the trial
  • Errors of law
  • Ruling, judgment, or decision not justified by the evidence or opposing to the law

I have discovered new evidence which was not considered by the district court during the trial. I have already appealed this decision. How can I introduce the new evidence in court?

An appeal is a process that is based on any errors made in the trial and is not linked to evidence. Hence new evidence cannot be introduced when the case is in appeal. If you lose the appeal plea, you can then file a motion for a new trial. Another option would be to drop the appeal and make a request instead for a new trial based on the new evidence. Dropping an appeal is a risky plan since it cannot be reinstated if the motion for a new trial is denied. Unless the evidence at hand is compelling enough to affect the entire case, it may be wiser to wait till the appeal decision is made. This approach would allow you to file a motion for a new trial if you lose the appeal and if you win, the new evidence would not be required. It is very rare to win a motion for a new trial unless you can prove the new evidence was impossible to have been discovered until after the trial.

Is there a possibility to have the jury’s verdict on my case re-considered?

There are ways to have the jury’s verdict reassessed. The judge could use his/her discretion and if the verdict of the jury is contradicting the evidence, it could be rejected. However the chances of a judge overruling a jury’s verdict are very low. The other options would be to file an appeal in a higher appellate court or file a motion for a new trial. The basis for a new trial would be if there were procedural errors which occurred during the trial or due to the incompetence of the lawyer. You would need to provide proof that the lawyer’s substandard job on your case led to you losing the case and majority of other lawyers would have handled the case differently.

I had applied for a motion for new trial which has been granted. How can I add an additional pleading to my petition?

A motion for a new trial implies you need to attend the hearing directly without any further pleading or new discoveries. In order to make amends or file an amended complaint, you need to make a motion for court’s leave. If you require more information to process your case, you need to include a request for the particular information in your motion to amend the complaint. This is also for the reason that once a motion for new trial is granted, the parties involved cannot engage in additional discovery without express permission from the court to do so.

Motion for a new trial, as the name suggests, is a request for a new trial. If granted, it is a second chance to present evidence old and new, and to seek justice. In order for it to be granted the court needs to be convinced of the need for a new trial is based on significant and valid reasons. To understand whether you should file a motion for a new trial or an appeal, consulting an Expert could reveal the most suitable course of action.
Ask a Legal question
Type Your Legal Question Here...
characters left:
14 Lawyers are Online Now

How JustAnswer Works:

  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.

JustAnswer in the News:

 
 
 
Ask-a-doc Web sites: If you've got a quick question, you can try to get an answer from sites that say they have various specialists on hand to give quick answers... Justanswer.com.
JustAnswer.com...has seen a spike since October in legal questions from readers about layoffs, unemployment and severance.
Web sites like justanswer.com/legal
...leave nothing to chance.
Traffic on JustAnswer rose 14 percent...and had nearly 400,000 page views in 30 days...inquiries related to stress, high blood pressure, drinking and heart pain jumped 33 percent.
Tory Johnson, GMA Workplace Contributor, discusses work-from-home jobs, such as JustAnswer in which verified Experts answer people’s questions.
I will tell you that...the things you have to go through to be an Expert are quite rigorous.
 
 
 

What Customers are Saying:

 
 
 
  • Wonderful service, prompt, efficient, and accurate. Couldn't have asked for more. I cannot thank you enough for your help. Mary C. Freshfield, Liverpool, UK
< Last | Next >
  • Wonderful service, prompt, efficient, and accurate. Couldn't have asked for more. I cannot thank you enough for your help. Mary C. Freshfield, Liverpool, UK
  • This expert is wonderful. They truly know what they are talking about, and they actually care about you. They really helped put my nerves at ease. Thank you so much!!!! Alex Los Angeles, CA
  • Thank you for all your help. It is nice to know that this service is here for people like myself, who need answers fast and are not sure who to consult. GP Hesperia, CA
  • I couldn't be more satisfied! This is the site I will always come to when I need a second opinion. Justin Kernersville, NC
  • Just let me say that this encounter has been entirely professional and most helpful. I liked that I could ask additional questions and get answered in a very short turn around. Esther Woodstock, NY
  • Thank you so much for taking your time and knowledge to support my concerns. Not only did you answer my questions, you even took it a step further with replying with more pertinent information I needed to know. Robin Elkton, Maryland
  • He answered my question promptly and gave me accurate, detailed information. If all of your experts are half as good, you have a great thing going here. Diane Dallas, TX
 
 
 

Meet The Experts:

 
 
 
  • Ron

    ASE Certified Technician

    Satisfied Customers:

    21184
    23 years with Ford specializing in drivability and electrical and AC. Ford certs and ASE Certs
< Last | Next >
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/FO/fordguy4u/2011-12-17_222940_HPIM1257.64x64.JPG Ron's Avatar

    Ron

    ASE Certified Technician

    Satisfied Customers:

    21184
    23 years with Ford specializing in drivability and electrical and AC. Ford certs and ASE Certs
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/lyeung1/2010-07-25_032152_tn_IMG_0241.JPG Dr. Y.'s Avatar

    Dr. Y.

    Urologist

    Satisfied Customers:

    18393
    I am fellowship trained specializing in general urology and reconstructive urology.
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/docjohn174/2008-12-13_170143_johnask.jpg John's Avatar

    John

    Home Appliance Technician

    Satisfied Customers:

    13453
    Appliance repair business owner for over 43 years.
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/MU/multistatelaw/2011-11-27_173951_Tinaglamourshotworkglow102011.64x64.jpg Tina's Avatar

    Tina

    Lawyer

    Satisfied Customers:

    8491
    JD, BBA Over 25 years legal and business experience.
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/dermdoc19/2010-09-30_160749_Photo_122807_015.JPG dermdoc19's Avatar

    dermdoc19

    Dermatologist

    Satisfied Customers:

    3848
    30 years practice in general and cosmetic dermatology
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/BI/birddoctor/2012-6-22_173214_birddoctor.64x64.png Dr. Pat's Avatar

    Dr. Pat

    Bird Veterinarian

    Satisfied Customers:

    3384
    25+ years working primarily or exclusively with birds
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/RY/rydergar/2012-6-6_192240_IMG0328.64x64.JPG Dr. Gary's Avatar

    Dr. Gary

    Cat Veterinarian

    Satisfied Customers:

    3299
    DVM, Emergency Veterinarian, BS (Physiology)
 
 
 

Recent New Trial Questions

  • I hired a Lawyer in 02/2012 to handle my workers comp case.

    I hired a Lawyer in 02/2012 to handle my workers comp case. In April 2013 she received and offer from the insurance company wanting to pay her for her time and trouble for handling my case and it would be up to her if she wanted to give me anything out of the process they would be giving her. This information came in with the fax I sent over before going to her office. When I arrived I was informed of the insurance company faxed offer by a staff member in the attorneys offices who had informed me that the insurance company was trying to cut me out of the settlement. The staff member of the law office was hoping that my attorney informed me once I got into her office. When I saw the paper work I grabbed for it and my attorney snatched it back and stated that it wasn't for me and never disclosed the offer. I did not her from my attorney until 12/14 concerning a mediation set for 02/2014. Which the counsel that made the offer was a know show. Never heard from my attorney until the eve before a trial on 06/02/14. Trial was set for 06/03/2014 which she post pond. Then I received a letter 07/05/2014 stating that she never heard from me. I email her on 07/08/14 indicating that I had been awaiting a letter for a new trial date. On 07/08/14 she email and states that she was withdrawing from my WCC case and place a lien on the case. The Form 93 states that she has made a good faith to notify the client and the client cannot be located. I did not understand what she mint by this because we communicated by email, phone and mail. I have never changed my number. She set the trial date for Aug 20, 2014. She also made contacted with Shannon which is with another law office I'm with to find out about another case of mine I have pending on something else, this was on 06/02/2014 where we all was on the call and though My Attorney for my WCC would make contact if she was able to post pone the hearing with another date, which my attorney for my WCC case never did.
  • We have a client who is in the process of settling a lawsuit

    We have a client who is in the process of settling a lawsuit against a large company for which they were originally awarded $22,000,000; however, the Company filed an appeal and asked for a new trial. In the process of preparing for the new trial the offer of $5,000,000 was made to my client who is going to accept to get rid of this burden and additional legal fees. the original lawsuit was won by an individual who became deceased shortly after the award, and just before the re-trial. What is the best way to structure this settlement - taxwise. Of course, the Estate wants to pay the least income taxes possible. Damages are supposed to be the nature of the award. Please advise the most advantageous way to have this structured. Thank you
  • New question for Socrateaser WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN

    New question for Socrateaser

    WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CONCLUSION OF LAW AND conclusion of fact? When you are pro per in a 657 hearing on a new trial motion, and you are dealing with #6 and #7 of code 657 (insufficiency of the evidence to justify the verdict or decision & error in law), how do we get around the attorney objecting to our argument on these 2 matters by saying we are not lawyers and therefore cannot argue conclusion of law?
    Examples:
    1. Under CCP 657 #6, to justify the fact that the "Jr" was left off of our dad's signature on the marriage document, the judge concluded our dad had 5 different signatures. But there was no evidence presented at the trial by either side that were docs executed before the alleged marriage took place that showed his signature without the "Jr." In addition, at least 3 of the docs used to support the 5 signature claim was never accepted to be entered in as evidence. Two other docs used were done by a notary the state of ca stated was never a notary and produced a negative certificate. On the same property, 30 years latsr another notary used by girlfriend hasnever handed in her expired notary log.

    2. During trial they used current law to argue their point instead of the low governing confidential marriages in 1976 - error in law.

    So how do we navigate avoiding our arguments being objected to because we are not attorneys?
< Last | Next >