How JustAnswer Works:

  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
A new question is answered every 9 seconds

Ask a Lawyer

Tina
Tina, Lawyer
Category: General
Satisfied Customers: 8603
Experience:  JD, BBA Over 25 years legal and business experience.
4460311
Type Your Legal Question Here...
characters left:
12 Lawyers are Online Now

JustAnswer in the News:

 
 
 
Ask-a-doc Web sites: If you've got a quick question, you can try to get an answer from sites that say they have various specialists on hand to give quick answers... Justanswer.com.
JustAnswer.com...has seen a spike since October in legal questions from readers about layoffs, unemployment and severance.
Web sites like justanswer.com/legal
...leave nothing to chance.
Traffic on JustAnswer rose 14 percent...and had nearly 400,000 page views in 30 days...inquiries related to stress, high blood pressure, drinking and heart pain jumped 33 percent.
Tory Johnson, GMA Workplace Contributor, discusses work-from-home jobs, such as JustAnswer in which verified Experts answer people’s questions.
I will tell you that...the things you have to go through to be an Expert are quite rigorous.
 
 
 

What Customers are Saying:

 
 
 
  • Wonderful service, prompt, efficient, and accurate. Couldn't have asked for more. I cannot thank you enough for your help. Mary C. Freshfield, Liverpool, UK
< Last | Next >
  • Wonderful service, prompt, efficient, and accurate. Couldn't have asked for more. I cannot thank you enough for your help. Mary C. Freshfield, Liverpool, UK
  • This expert is wonderful. They truly know what they are talking about, and they actually care about you. They really helped put my nerves at ease. Thank you so much!!!! Alex Los Angeles, CA
  • Thank you for all your help. It is nice to know that this service is here for people like myself, who need answers fast and are not sure who to consult. GP Hesperia, CA
  • I couldn't be more satisfied! This is the site I will always come to when I need a second opinion. Justin Kernersville, NC
  • Just let me say that this encounter has been entirely professional and most helpful. I liked that I could ask additional questions and get answered in a very short turn around. Esther Woodstock, NY
  • Thank you so much for taking your time and knowledge to support my concerns. Not only did you answer my questions, you even took it a step further with replying with more pertinent information I needed to know. Robin Elkton, Maryland
  • He answered my question promptly and gave me accurate, detailed information. If all of your experts are half as good, you have a great thing going here. Diane Dallas, TX
 
 
 

Motion to Suppress Questions

Motion to suppress is a written statement requesting a judge to remove evidence from a trial. Generally the reason for a motion to suppress is based on case law. For example, the actions of a police officer while conducting a search violated a person's Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure. To learn more about motion to suppress, read the questions below that have been answered by Experts.

I was arrested for trespassing, I was then charged with trespassing, possession of paraphernalia, and consumption of a controlled substance. Would this be an unlawful arrest if I wasn't trespassing?

Usually, it would be considered an unlawful arrest if there was no probable cause. If the police didn't have probable cause, it may be possible for your attorney to make a motion to suppress the findings of the arrest, including the illegal consumption. If the police assumed that you had in fact trespassed, they would have probable cause, therefore the motion to suppress would be denied. However, if there was no probable cause and the police found the illegal consumption as a result of the arrest, it may be possible for the evidence to be suppressed.

What do I need to state when I file a motion to suppress evidence or a motion to dismiss? I'm located in Montgomery County, PA.

In order to file a motion to suppress, you will be expected to show cause as to why the evidence shouldn't be used in the trial. There should be a foundation to base this reason on, such as; the evidence was obtained unlawfully. Many reasons for suppression are denied, for example, evidence may be embarrassing to the individual and they want to keep it from the trial. This type of request would generally be denied.

As for the Motion to Dismiss, when filing, you would state the reason for the dismissal. For example, if you have settled a dispute with the opposing side and you both wish to settle the matter outside of the court, you would state the reason in the motion to dismiss and request the court to allow the motion.

What should happen if the Miranda rights were not fully read to a suspect at the time of being placed in custody? However, about an hour later an officer did read them in full but he was not the arresting officer. I was never questioned.

Generally, there is no need for Miranda rights to be read to a person if they haven't been arrested yet or if they are not being interrogated. In the event that you are arrested and questions by the police, you could file a Motion to suppress everything that you have said prior to being read your Miranda rights. However, any information that you offer to the police before you are arrested would not be covered by the motion to suppress. This only applies to information given after an arrest but before Miranda rights have been read.

In this situation, there was no interrogation by the police therefore; there was no need for the Miranda to be read. If the police had questioned you, your option would be to file a Motion to suppress.

If the police pull someone out of their home by gunpoint to question them, then threaten the person to sign a consent to search (by gunpoint), what is the person's rights?

You could file a motion to suppress with the court if you feel like you were forced to sign a search consent or if you feel like your home was searched unlawfully. In order to obtain a search warrant, the police need probable cause. However, the police can search a home without a warrant if there is evidence of an emergency situation. If the police are given consent to search a home, they are entitled to conduct the search. However, being held at gunpoint and forced to sign the consent would be a form of coercion. If this is the case, you file the motion to suppress any evidence that was found during the search. You will need to explain why you think the search was unlawful. Usually, when a person files a motion to suppress, a hearing will be held. If you are successful in winning the motion to suppress, any evidence found during the search will be denied by the court and the charges will probably be dropped. You may want to consider hiring an attorney to assist you with the motion to suppress. This type of motion is generally hard to accomplish and is centered on case law.

A motion to suppress is generally applied when there is evidence that is going to be entered that could potentially affect the outcome of a trial. In many situations, people attempt to file this type of motion without the aid of an experienced attorney. While a person can file a motion to suppress, the process is much smoother when assisted by an expert in case law. If you are in a situation that requires a motion to suppress or are unsure of your legal standing or rights, you should consider asking an Expert to evaluate the details of your case and provide legal insights.

Ask a Lawyer

Tina
Tina, Lawyer
Category: General
Satisfied Customers: 8603
Experience:  JD, BBA Over 25 years legal and business experience.
4460311
Type Your Legal Question Here...
characters left:
12 Lawyers are Online Now

How JustAnswer Works:

  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.

Lawyers are online & ready to help you now

Ron
ASE Certified Technician
Satisfied Customers: 21603
23 years with Ford specializing in drivability and electrical and AC. Ford certs and ASE Certs
Dr. Y.
Urologist
Satisfied Customers: 18607
I am fellowship trained specializing in general urology and reconstructive urology.
John
Home Appliance Technician
Satisfied Customers: 13453
Appliance repair business owner for over 43 years.

Recent Motion to Suppress Questions

  • Can police, when executing a search warrant, take documents

    Can police, when executing a search warrant, take documents that are related to my private investigation practice but not to the case at hand? Objects taken were anything related to private investigation techniques. But I am a licensed private investigator.
  • Does law enforcement have right to come on private property

    Does law enforcement have right to come on private property without notifying landowner of their presence and search for stolen property? During their search they allegedly found something drug related and used that to obtain a search warrant for the house and property. They then knocked and notified occupant of house of their presence and findings. Occupant was ordered out of residence until warrat was returned 3 hrs later. Took the phone and powered it off. Occupant was a vusitor. Happened in fl. Is this a violation of my right as the landowner
  • If law enforcement knocks on your door and states they think

    If law enforcement knocks on your door and states they think illegal activity is going on and states we can do this the easy way or the hard way we will get a search warrant kick down your door and tear you your house apart . the respondent at the door is physically and mentally disabled hesitates to give them access and the law enforcement say well just let us in so we can talk, respondent gives them access and law enforcement immediately starts to search while one official distracts the physically and mentally disabled person can this be argued as illegal search and is there valid argument for a motion to suppress
< Last | Next >
View More Legal Questions