Is this document effective, to transfer IP rights?
Is this document effective, to transfer IP rights?ASSIGNMENT AND TRANSFER AGREEMENTThis Assignment and Transfer Agreement (“Agreement”) is made as of ___________, 20__ (“Effective Date”) between ________________. (“Assignee”), and ________________ (“Assignor”). In consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained in this Agreement, the parties agree as follows:1. Definitions1.1 “Assigned Property” means the Intellectual Property Rights related with the now abandoned US Patent Application Ser. No. xxxxx “abcdefg"2. Assignment. Assignor hereby perpetually, irrevocably, and unconditionally assigns, transfers, and conveys to Assignee and its successors and assigns, all of Assignor's right, title, and interest in and to the Assigned Property3. Consideration. In consideration for assignments made by Assignor under this Agreement, Assignee will pay Assignor $10 dollars.4. Further Assurances4.1 Assistance. Assignor will take all action and execute all documents as Assignee may reasonably request to effectuate the transfer of the Assigned Property and the vesting of complete and exclusive ownership of the Assigned Property in Assignee.4.2 Power of Attorney. If at any time Assignee is unable, for any reason, to secure Assignor's signature on any letters patent, copyright, or trademark assignments or applications for registrations, or other documents or filings pertaining to any or all of the Assigned Property, whether because of Assignor's unwillingness, or for any other reason whatsoever, Assignor hereby irrevocably designates and appoints Assignee and its duly authorized officers and agents as its agents and attorneys-in-fact, to act for and on its behalf and stead to execute and file any and all such applications, registrations, and other documents with the same legal force and effect as if executed by Assignor.5. Miscellaneous5.1 Governing Law and Jurisdiction. This Agreement will be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Maryland.5.2 Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is held invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity will not affect the validity or operation of any other provision, and the invalid provision will be deemed severed from this Agreement.[Assignor] [Assignee]By:_________________________ By:____________________________Title:_______________________ Title:____________________________
There are people, who slipped my findings (in plasma
There are people, who slipped my findings (in plasma research) in their work and got benefited from it publishing fundamental work (group A). Other groups (group B), who I have also talked and said that my physics was important in their Government funded models, included major finding of my work in their numerical works and when I complained, now I see that they are referencing the work of people from group A.Both these groups get money from NASA, NSF, etc., i.e. Governmental Sources. Most of my work was done on my own time, and despite numerous attempts - I never got funded (well, money was going to those thieves) and now the situation is like in my letter to Senate and Congress Committee:https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/letter-sent-us-senators-members-committee-science-kaghashvili-phd-?trk=mp-reader-cardSo, my question is what can I do legally? There are many groups who I talked and all of them thought that they took nothing important from me, as one Professor wrote to me:"My apologies if we omitted your reference — can you send me the citation info? (I saw the hyperlink to linked-in in your message, but I'm looking for the bibliographic citation, something I can put in future papers.) Our model is super-simple — we neglect density fluctuations and background-density variations perpendicular to the background field, as well as all compressive fluctuations and kinetic effects. This may be why we are not including the waves you're describing. I saw that you wrote to Bart and me as well separately, but the same comment about the super-simple model (no density fluctuations or compressions) applies there as well."Both groups knew my work, their work includes my important findings, and I am not sure NASA, NSF (I wrote them several times), or other funding agency will easily confess that they made mistakes form 7-8 years now.All these research was done on my own time, while having a day-job on Gov. project hoping that one of my grants might be awarded since 2007!? I spent many hours of my family time, twice were very close for family of four to be separated because my spouse felt, and I agree with her, that I was spending too much family time on that. But now I know that I never had a chance, people I spoke since 2008-2009 (Univ. Professors, high-ranked NASA scientist, etc.) were taking my major finding and including in the work, and then they were rewarding even more, etc.So, what is that I can do?
Would you take a case against inventhelp, the companies that
would you take a case against inventhelpJA: What state are you in? It matters because laws vary by location.Customer: the companies that I paid them to submit my ideas turned out to be fakeJA: Has anything been filed or reported?Customer: noJA: Anything else you want the lawyer to know before I connect you?Customer: no
Are there any patent attorneys here that are familiar with
Hi, are there any patent attorneys here that are familiar with filing provisional patents?JA: What's the invention's purpose?Customer: It will be a strap device to hold a vaporizer.JA: Has anything been filed or reported?Customer: I haven't researched it yet, but I have not seen anything like it in the marketplace at this time.JA: Anything else you want the lawyer to know before I connect you?Customer: I just have questions regarding the device itself and exactly what can be patented on it. My product will consist of 3 elements. Two of the elements are existing products which are already patented. The third element of the product is a part that I am having manufactured. All 3 elements will be combined to make my product. Ok thank you.
My company has made a product for 30 years for 1 customer
My company has made a product for 30 years for 1 customer and he sold it as his own and distributed it workdwide. He even had a patent on a particular item we manufactured at one point that ran out in 2005. The party we sold the product to and my father helped design it together, but we own the drawings. The businesses were passed down to the next generation and now the guy I manufactured the product for had it reverse engineered. My question is is there any copyright infringement here as I would like to take my product direct to market.JA: What's the invention's purpose?Customer: Golf ball washerJA: Have you talked to a local attorney? Has anything been filed in court?Customer: NoJA: Anything else you want the lawyer to know before I connect you?Customer: No
My question is regarding a patent, Smoking device. There is
My question is regarding a patentJA: What's the invention's purpose?Customer: Smoking device. There is a patent on a product and I was wondering if I could work around that by adding a function to the device and not get into any legal trouble.JA: Has anything been filed or reported?Customer: FiledJA: Anything else you want the lawyer to know before I connect you?Customer: No
Vice President & General Counsel
I have a percussion instrument patent question- utlility,
I have a percussion instrument patent question-JA: What's the invention's purpose?Customer: utlilityJA: Have you talked to a local attorney? Has anything been filed in court?Customer: Nothing filed yet, close toJA: Anything else you want the lawyer to know before I connect you?Customer: Before filing, need another persons thouths. I have two brothers that worked on this idea. One brother is now deceased. My living brother decided to move forward on the patent but add the deceased brothers name on it since he was a part of it. The question is, if my deceased brother has a daughter does he need to add this to the patent paperwork. Or is this something that can be done in a will / bequethe, sold to ?
I am a lawyer myself. I have" created" or "invented" a
I am a lawyer myself. I have" created" or "invented" a significant change to a particular baseball rule which will change a certain aspect of baseball which is problematic. This rule change, I believe would be very appealing to owners and players and I would like to "market" it and present it, but want to protect it as IP, if the law permits this. I am not schooled in IP law and don't know if this is possible, but I know that if it is not subject to protection, it will be stolen and used without any benefit to me. Your thoughts on whether and how I can protect this. David ReidJA: Is this about an invention, a design, or an artistic work?Customer: see my message, ty DavidJA: Have you talked to a local attorney? Has anything been filed in court?Customer: nothing has been filed- I have not talked with a local copyright attorney- for now I have kept this secret - DavidJA: Anything else you want the lawyer to know before I connect you?Customer: nothing that I can think of at the moment
I have this campain on kickstarter i launched 2 days ago my
I have this campain on kickstarter i launched 2 days ago https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1019999024/tubgenie-the-tub-stopper-strainer-hair-catcher-com?ref=user_menu my product is a bath tub stopper and strainer . The inventors on tubshroom contacted me asking me to take down my campain becoz i copied their product. the tubshroom is a strainer /hair catcher and is not a stopper . what should i do here is thier website www.tubshroom.com