I have hired a construction contractor. According to the
I have hired a construction contractor. According to the contract he should finish the job on Tuesday next week. According to the contract I pay him $1000 each time he is done with a quarter of the total completed job. We have a huge disagreement on the amount of work done. After a day working he abandoned the job as he believes he has finished a quarter of the work and based on what I see (even I bought 2 contractors who don't know the person believe he has only done a tenth of the total work.How can I legally hire another contractor and not wait until Wednesday next week to get the work finished? Since he left I have been communicating through text with him.Everyday the job is sitting there, I am loosing time and money as next Wednesday I will be back at work and can't oversea the work.
If a company holds a sweepstakes/contest and they put out a
If a company holds a sweepstakes/contest and they put out a set of rules and begin the promotion, can they legally change the rules or elements of the game after it's started? What's a company's libability in this situation?
Counselor at Law
What does ADR/ Alternative Dispute Resolution (Workflow)
What does ADR/ Alternative Dispute Resolution (Workflow) mean on a pending default judgment? It has a date of 5/15/2016, which isnt here yet. This is a debt that was defaulted because i didnt go to the court date, but this debt is past the statue of limitations and i am trying to fight this to get it off. Its still pending, what should I do?
I am trying to settle a debt collection lawsuit in which a
I am trying to settle a debt collection lawsuit in which a Plaintiff doctor sued me for non-payment of a medical procedure and I filed a counterclaim for malpractice, fraud, and consumer fraud. The Plaintiff agreed to a mutual dismissal of all claims if we paid $1300 as well as sign a stipulation of settlement which has a couple of clauses that are concerning to me:3. Defendant agrees that her claims for malpractice, fraud, and consumer fraud set forth in counterclaim are meritless.4. Plaintiff agrees that they will pursue no claim for frivolous litigation or any other action arising out of defendant's filing a counter claim herein.6. In the event default persists for seven days, the attorney for plaintiff may with notice to the Defendant, obtain judgement from this court, ex parte, the amount then due by setting forth the nature of the default and the amount due.Can someone tell me why the Plaintiff's attorney want's us to agree that our counterclaims are meritless in clause #3? What liability can this expose us to by agreeing to this?Does clause #4 protect us from any such liabilities?What does clause #6 mean?
I went to Sanford which turned into Sanford college and
I went to Sanford brown which turned into Sanford brown college and changed the color telling us they are now accredited. They closed down now I graduated in 2012 and never received my diploma. Where I had my intern ship at got shut down a couple weeks later for being ran illegally. I have school loans from nelnet.com because my tuition covered everything. Than for some reason I ended up getting a bill from Sanford brown saying I owed them 2300.00 right after I finished my intern ship. Than my internship place got shut down by the state. Sandord brown college sent the 2300$ I owe them for some reason to bill collectors who have been harassing me saying I owe it to them when main corp of Sanford brown college shut down. Is there anything I can do?
I have been deemed by the superior court of California to be
I have been deemed by the superior court of California to be a vexatious litigant. As you know, if I want to file new litigation as a proper, I must gain permission by the presiding judge. Someone has sued me in the limited jurisdiction of the superior court of California and I want to counter sue. As you also know, if I proceed pro se to counter sue in a case that I did not initiate, I can waive gaining permission from the presiding judge on a counter suit. The superior court limited jurisdiction case in which I want to counter sue names me as an individual and also the active corporation, which I'm the whole owner of. Even though I own an active corporation, I'm indigent, which is why I couldn't and still can't afford an attorney to represent me. I can support the fact I'm indigent with documents that prove I collect public assistance (SSI). As you know, a party which is a corporation in a superior court limited jurisdiction case must be represented by an attorney. Do I have to move the court to represent my corporation as a proper in limited jurisdiction? Can I move to exclude my corporation and just represent myself as an individual? What authority(ies) would give me the right to represent my corporation in limited jurisdiction? What authority(ies) would give me the right to exclude my corporation as a named party and represent myself as an indigent proper individual?
Is this true? You do not have to disclose why you are
Is this true?You do not have to disclose why you are seeking the information. You can ask for people who were harassed by these companies to reply to you with information, but you do not have to disclose why you are seeking the information or that it is for your specific case.