I have a -term employee in our printing plant who, according
I have a long-term employee in our printing plant who, according to two female employees, has been staring at their crotch. Apparently, this has been going on for some time. When they say something to him he denies it, but stops it for a while, then continues. The women are reluctant to tell me. They told someone in the office who told me. What should I do?
Filed Section 1981 case in district court, ny Oct 1, 2015
filed Section 1981 case in district court, ny Oct 1, 2015 against school district. amended complaint several times. Complaint is being reviewed for dismissal. Filed counter-claim to amend along with opposition. on or about 7/22/16 discovered new allegations/violations against defendants. filed motion to supplement. NY Ed law 3813 states notice of claim must be filed. did so on October 7, 2016. Question: How long after serving/filing amended/supplemented notice of claim on board of ed must I wait before filing an amended complaint at district court?JA: Because traffic laws vary from place to place, can you tell me what state this is in? Our average wait time is under 20 minutes. Sometimes it takes just a minute. More complicated questions that need more research might take an hour or two. I'd be happy to chat with you while you wait. The stories I've heard working here...Customer: this is not a traffic case. it is civil rights/employment discrimination. need expert advice. thank you.JA: Has anything been filed or reported?Customer: please read my first submission. Thank you so much.JA: Anything else you want the lawyer to know before I connect you?Customer: there are several actions that fall under title VII or section 1991 of the civil rights act, NYSHRL 296 et seq. Section 1983, 1985(c), 1985(c)and Section 1986,
My son was kicked out of a game after a player on the other
My son was kicked out of a game after a player on the other team made racial comments called him the N word and made monkey signs sounds and gestures at him. This was all in front of the officials. The officials threw my son out for responding and I quote "Wow, really? This isn't even a game we are killing you guys" at that point my son recieved his first penalty then my son went to the sidelines and the player kept taunting him with signs clapping name calling and again monkey gestures. At that point my son made a hand gesture like yeah yeah keep talking (moving hand up and down like Pac-man) at this the refs threw a second unsportsmanlike penalty and he was ejected from the game. The coaches told the officials what was happening and even pointed to the player making the derogatory signs sounds and comments but the refs chose to ignore that and exclude my son for participating. There is about 38 seconds of film of the player taunting our sidelines while the officials ignored him and ejected my son. Since my son was ejected he also cannot participate in the next game. Is there grounds for action based on my son being excluded from Athletics because some officials showed racial bias in favor of the player making derogatory remarks? This of course happened in a very small town in Ca.
I am a pro se Plaintiff, and was just deposed. During the deposition,
I am a pro se Plaintiff, and was just deposed. During the deposition, the opposing attorney told me to write down the exact laws that I allege he violated. And since I had not brought any paperwork with me, he stated that I must forward that information to him within 10 days.Question: Is it my responsibility as the Plaintiff, to tell him which laws he broke? If so, where is that requirement located in the FRCP? And if not, how should I proceed......Thanks
I work in a public school in North Carolina. My
,Hello,I work in a public school in North Carolina. My position is curriculum support in the district office. None of us currently teaches.Every month, people in the same position in surrounding counties meet to go over updates for our position. For at least the past 2 years (as long as I have been in this position), someone has said a blessing before lunch, and no one has ever complained. It has obviously been a custom for a long time, and I'm perfectly fine with it.We have someone new on our team who attended this meeting with us in October. During the blessing, he was quite rude, whispering that "they better not pray in Jesus' name." After the blessing, he stepped out of the room and paced back & forth like a bull and complained that his constitutional rights had been violated and that the blessing was illegal. We were NOT on any school property, and NO students were present.He is going to be attending this meeting with us again tomorrow - probably for the last time, since his attending these two meetings is only for his certification requirements.A member of our team told him that someone would be saying a blessing before lunch, as that has been the custom for a long time. Again, this guy flipped out and said that the blessing would violate his constitutional rights and that it would be illegal. And again, the meeting will NOT be on school property, and there will be NO students present. There will be 40 people present, and he is the only person who has ever complained about this.My question is (for North Carolina):1. Is the blessing violating this man's constitutional rights?2. Is the blessing illegal?3. Just in case we ever do meet on school property (there would still be NO students present), would the answers to #1 & #2 be the same?Thank you in advance.
Counselor at Law
We belong to a semi-private country club in Florida. It just
We belong to a semi-private country club in Florida. It just passed a new regulation that forbids social or athletic members from booking tee times and playing golf before 11:00 am. However, charter members and outside NON-CLUB MEMBERS (AKA:the public) are free to book tee times and play whenever they want. Isn't that discriminating against the social and athletic members if services are available to the public but not to them? Isn't that illegal? The social and athletic members think this was done to intimidate them into buying the more expensive charter membership.
I am a female civilian that was sent to a military
I am a female civilian that was sent to a military installation to perform duties for my job. When I arrived at the gate they informed me that the base was under some high security alert and they asked me to follow them. I was taken to a room by three military males and was told to remove my clothing. I asked for a female to be present, but they never sent for the female. After I was down to just my underwear, I was told that they were going to enjoy this search. They began patting down my entire body including between my thighs. Is this proper protocol?
I am a PhD-holding academic and I recently applied
Hello. I am a PhD-holding academic and I recently applied for an instructor position at a California community college. My application was not forward for consideration to the selection committee because I failed to include a "detailed transcript evaluation," required on account that my PhD-granting institution (University of Oxford) was foreign.I looked into the matter further. The community college lists four companies they approve to provide the "evaluation" service--for a PhD-holding applicant the fees range from $195 to over $300. I find it incredible that some applicants should have to pay ~$200 just to *apply* for a job at a public institution. I have applied for many academic jobs--several at public schools in California--and have never encountered such a requirement.I just write to ask if there are even the faintest legal shades of discrimination in this policy. I would never pursue the matter via a lawsuit, but I am deeply curious as to how it's possible for a public institution to require some applicants and not others to pay a large sum simply to *apply* for a job. Note: I am a US citizen.
Attorney At Law
Doctor of Law w/ highest honors
I understand that these days Psychology is taught at the gh
I understand that these days Psychology is taught at the High School level, and to some extent they work with experimenting and what not. If I work near a High School do I have the legal right not to be studied or have this practiced on I? Do I have a legal right not to be arrested by a Local Police Department for any Psychology study such as the Stanford Prison experiment? How would I protect myself from what I would consider a intrusion into my life? Would I be able to sue for monetary compensation?