Old credit card from 2005, have a judgement against me.we
old credit card from 2005, have a judgement against me.we never received any paper work or calls from this firm until now. Is time frame your not responsible?JA: Because employment law varies from place to place, can you tell me what state this is in?Customer: delawareJA: Has anything been filed or reported?Customer: yes a judgementJA: Anything else you want the lawyer to know before I connect you?Customer: contacted them because it was for 11,000 for time but it was only for 3,400. contacted them for settlement and they would take 5,000. because of all this time do i have any rights
I have a question about school bullying. My son is a 9th
Hi,I have a question about school bullying. My son is a 9th grader. A group of kids at school are bullying him. My son never told me about it despite me asking him. Yesterday it came to my knowledge that these kids made a fan page on one of the social networkin website. Inviting other kids to the pictures they took at school and making rude comments. I want to know if have any legal case or should I go to police. I spoke with the guidance counselor, she told me that the are conducting an investigation and they are not sure what actions they will take. All I want is to protect my son. What are my options.
I have a question on a personal injury claim as it relates
I have a question on a personal injury claim as it relates to crimes of Domestic Violence over a long period of time—6 years. Crimes are emotional violence—Cyberstalking using modern technology the internet—In my case my Ex falsifying my identity/SS# ***** a company remote monitoring employee—such monitoring includes Web Cam, Audio, GPS. I have proper evidence such domestic violence crimes have occurred and properly validated as acceptable evidence (science), in the court of law.My claim--Personal injury due to extreme emotional domestic violence—as there are no broken bones, bruises is very difficult to prove—much less computer/stalking crimes—I have proved computer, stalking crimes with proper evidence recognized in the court of law—I have now documented by SSDI due to my such emotional abuse—After DDSi reviewed my Doctor, therapist, domestic Violence shelter files—I wrote a story based on fact what has happened and how it has effected me emotionally--within 4 weeks SSDI concluede my concerns as Extreme—Complex PTSD—very serious emotion infliction—not fun to have—I am now considered disabled—I am entitled to a disability check monthly.Added to my concerns, as my Ex's company is quite successful, political power—cops knew crimes have occurred, witnessed substantial evidence in my home 3 times, but failed to put such evidence in all 3 reports (falsified all reports), allowing such piracy invasions to continue another 4 1/2 years—each time officer in my home, I recorded all officials in my home proving all official reports were falsified, recordings do not lie —one falsifed report was given to DOJ/DCI who request my 1st case opened and properly investigated—I believe that is called Obstruction to Justice.Added and cops knows--Dad did it to my two mature daughters, one s a minor—corporate tracking, predators on the internet—which I have properly documented.As with official reports written—words written in replace of substantiated evidence were words severely defaming my character a inept, unstable not too be believed—again allowing such privacey invasions to continue—as such reports are opened records is clear Libel, Slander and defamation—open to all public to read and make judgement on my character—adding great public humiliation.Your thoughts on such a personal injury civil lawsuit to all parties—my Ex, Emotional Domestic Violence Crimes and Outrageous Criminal conduct of cops.I know this story is not believable—but sadly it did happenHow would such a Personal Injury case be viewed?
I'm a nanny for a family part time while the father works as
I'm a nanny for a family part time while the father works as a pilot and the mom attends night school. Are they allowed to pay me less hourly when their two children are sleeping?JA: Because employment law varies from place to place, can you tell me what state this is in?Customer: CAJA: Is the employment agreement "at will," union, full time or part time?Customer: Part time, once a week on Tuesdays from 3 p.m. to 10:30 p.m.JA: Anything else you want the lawyer to know before I connect you?Customer: Am I entitled to overtime for hours I work with another family?
What do you know about Real Estate Law Center? We have given
What do you know about Real Estate Law Center? We have given them $3,000.00 and still have to pay another $3,000.00 for them to protect out home under the California Homeowners Bill of Rights Restructure of property program. Are they legal?JA: Because real estate law varies from place to place, can you tell me what state this is in?Customer: CaliforniaJA: Have you talked to a lawyer yet?Customer: NoJA: Anything else you think the lawyer should know?Customer: No
I went to a local (VT) hospital foot operation.I have no
Hi I went to a local (VT) hospital for a foot operation.I have no mental or compentencyproblem They have a nursing home attached and a social worker wants to confine me to the NH. They send out the st police a couple of times I have a poa My son says the sw's have poa of their own and the backing of judges. What can I do to prevent seizure againstmy will I don't even trust the local attorney-I think she will favor the court I don't even dare to go back to the state Same thing happened to my ex in mass they seized all property but she had dementia -house land and bank accounts Bill of rights and first ammendment apply? Forty years in the state and now excilled Advice?
FBI leaked secret Grand Jury information. Government found
FBI leaked secret Grand Jury information. Government found no wrong doing but leaked info being used by foreign company to civilly sue small Michigan family business.My dad has fought billion dollar company using Google for 9yrs but there seems little resolution in sight. We have lost our job, home, and our family is no longer the same.Is this not a bill of rights violation or some kind of violation of our privacy that can stop the current case or that can be investigated?The following is based on hundreds of documents and numerous affidavits entered into the record since the case commenced in February 2009. A timeline of events with references to this evidence (including docket numbers) can be found in a document filed with the Court in October 2013. Please click here to view this document (the file is 20 MB in size, so please be patient).Beginning in 2001, Dassault and its partners, IBM and MSC Software, initiated business agreements with Mr. Childress' school as a means of promoting sales of Dassault's CATIA software and other services. These longstanding mutually advantageous business agreements included Dassault and MSC Software advertising on the school's top-ranked website (practicalcatia.com), and IBM and MSC Software providing Mr. Childress and his students with the CATIA software and licenses for use in their training (Dassault owned a substantial share of MSC Software).In 2004 Dassault put a plan into motion to end its 50-50 partnership with IBM and take control of sales, marketing, licensing, and distribution of CATIA, and to monopolize the CATIA training market. Dassault entered into a joint venture with a Canadian company named RAND Worldwide that had once been responsible for marketing, sales, licensing, and distribution of a CAD software program named Pro-E; a competitor of CATIA. This is the same function IBM had served since IBM and Dassault formed their partnership in 1981. Dassault and RAND Worldwide formed a new company named RAND North America which, unbeknownst to Mr. Childress, became his school's direct competitor when RAND North America opened an office near Mr. Childress' school and began offering CATIA trainingTo eliminate Mr. Childress' school as its competitor, Dassault filed a criminal complaint with the FBI in 2005 accusing Mr. Childress and his school of infringing on Dassault's CATIA copyright. Dassault's complaint led to a federal grand jury investigation and a related FBI raid of Mr. Childress' school while his son was teaching a class. Mr. Childress presented evidence of the business agreements Dassault and its partners initiated with Mr. Childress' school, including the hundreds of CATIA licenses IBM and MSC Software provided to Mr. Childress and his students as a result of these business agreements. In addition, Mr. Childress asked to testify before the federal grand jury. Mr. Childress and his school were subsequently exonerated of infringing on Dassault's CATIA copyright.Having failed in its attempt to close Mr. Childress' school, in February 2009 Dassault filed a multimillion-dollar civil suit accusing Mr. Childress and his family's school of infringing on Dassault's CATIA copyright and trademark. During the time in which Mr. Childress was alleged to have infringed on Dassault CATIA copyright and trademark, Dassault partners IBM and MSC Software had provided Mr. Childress and his students with hundreds of CATIA licenses, and Dassault was advertising on Mr. Childress' practicalcatia.com website.Mr. Childress could no longer afford legal representation, so he was forced to represent himself and his family in federal court without an attorney.In May 2009, Dassault filed a Motion for Entry of Default Judgment against Mr. Childress for a minor rule infraction. The Court granted Dassault's Motion for Entry of Default Judgment and the case was closed. Because Dassault won by "default", the court automatically adopted Dassault's damage claim, thus ordering Mr. Childress to pay Dassault $1,000,000 dollars in fictitious damages, and to surrender his training computer and his school's practicalcatia.com website to Dassault. The $1,000,000 damage award was based solely on Dassault's trumped-up lost revenues, not on Mr. Childress' and/or his school's income.The grand jury investigation left Mr. Childress and his family penniless, so Mr. Childress did not pay Dassault anything. However, Mr. Childress was forced to surrender his training computer to Dassault (containing his legally licensed CATIA software), and to take down his school's practicalcatia.com website (that Dassault had been advertising on for more than 5 years).Mr. Childress filed an immediate appeal.In a December 2011 "Published" Opinion, the Sixth Circuit reversed the district court's entry of Default Judgment, thus reopening the case. In June 2012, Mr. Childress filed an 11-Count Counterclaim, accusing Dass
TO, ESQ.: I had further questions on the topic of the last
TO GERALD, ESQ.:Hello, I had further questions on the topic of the last questions I asked. Regarding the medical records of a senior at an assisted living facility.I am the personal rep./POA for her. I want to see her record for this place where she had two falls. I understand from you, that the facility needs 24 hr. notice for records viewing. Will they produce in paper form? I am not sure if I asked, but what is the amount per page they can charge for her records in Maryland?I just need to give them 24 hours notice, then I can come in and view records as little as 24 hours later?Also, Can I request a years' worth etc.?Will I be viewing the records with the staff standing over me?Also, the whole time we were at this Assisted Living , there was never a legally-required posting of the Assisted Living Resident's Bill of Rights, nor their surveys. However, after the last fall, a week after, all-of-the-sudden these things were posted largely and prominently! That is a violation I believe.I also noticed the contract they wanted her/me to sign this year, states an extremely high cost 4th level of Assited Living care tier(not called Level 4, called "Service Pack Enhanced" adding potentially $3,900.00 a month to Basic Service Feeof 6,500) They are only licensed to provide Level of Care Assisted living , Level 3. I feel like there is some deception.
I have a disability hearing scheduled 14th of March. The
I have a disability hearing scheduled for the 14th of March. The state had me meet a medical professional today prior to the hearing. I was "informed" that my medical records show that I am attending AA? I have never attended AA nor has it been a thought. I asked "who made that entry" but of course it was confidential.What recourse do I have?