"For Gerald, esq"... Hi. This question is follow-up to my question from October 13, in which I asked in regards ***** ***** process inside a federal section 1985 civil rights conspiracy claim.
I mentioned that as party to the 1985 conspiracy claim I have listed a defendant county judge and 7 DA investigators.
You answered that these individuals would need to be served both in their individual and official capacities...meaning, that they would need to be served as individuals, as well the state agency by whom they are employed would need to be served a copy.
I have a couple of follow-up questions about all this. First, there are 7 DA investigators. Serving them individually will require, of course, 7 summonses: one for each of them; however in regards ***** ***** I will only need also to serve the DA's office WITH A SINGLE COPY of the complaint, and a SINGLE SUMMONS, correct?...or would I need to serve 7 copies of the complaint and summons for each investigator, on the DA? Refer to federal rule 4(j)(2)(A)
Also, having the judge as part of the conspiracy makes things a bit complicated, doesn't it? Basically this is to suggest that the judicial district (through its agent, the judge) is in conspiracy with the DA's office??? Okay...so I list in my complaint the judge as a party in both his official and individual capacities; and then I serve the judge as an individual, and provide a copy for the judicial district, his employer. I list the judge as a party in my complaint, but do I list also the judicial district/ district court as a separate party???
I was the counter defendant in a lawsuit. The case got dismissed because I am a corporation and my attorney did some strange stuff and withdrew without contacting me. The judge allowed him to withdraw without my consent and ordered me to find another attorney within 30 days. The court sent the notice to the wrong address and the time expired without me knowing. I was informed by the AZ bar who had my files. The counter plaintiff is seeking a default judgement. I'm appealing the judges ruling. Question: 1. What is the Arizona or federal law that requires a court to send a judges order to the parties in the case. 2. What is the law that requires an attorney to engage a client in the case, make sure the client is aware of and approves what's going on... 3. What law allows an attorney of record to Disavowal of Substitution of Counsel without the client being involved or able to be heard at the hearing Find legal case files supporting the law. Optional Information:
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service.