How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask Stephen G. Your Own Question
Stephen G.
Stephen G., Sr Income Tax Expert
Category: Tax
Satisfied Customers: 6181
Experience:  Extensive Experience with Tax, Financial & Estate Issues
30050794
Type Your Tax Question Here...
Stephen G. is online now
A new question is answered every 9 seconds

This is complicated. Person A buys property as primary

Customer Question

This is complicated. Person A buys property as primary residence. 2 years later person A Quitclaims property to person B (family member)but still holds the mortgage. Person B rents property to child while in school and various people over a few years with no profit intended or realized. Lender doesn't like the situation and property is Quit-claimed back to person A while person B continues to pay mortgage, rent it at cost and takes tax deductions. 15 years pass and person A takes over the rental, renting it to siblings with no profit, makes upgrades and takes tax deductions. After 5 years of renting to sibling with no profit, sibling wants to purchase property for the balance owed on the mortgage (half the appraised value). What tax consequences does person A have when selling the property after only claiming depreciation and costs for 5 out of the 15 years property has been used as a not for profit rental?
Submitted: 1 year ago.
Category: Tax
Expert:  Stephen G. replied 1 year ago.

OK, let's go through it step by step.

1. A purchases the property. No problem. What was the purchase price?

2. A "quitclaims" property to B.

o Was the property sold to B? subject to the outstanding mortgage?

o Was the equity in the property gifted to B subject to the mortgage? What was the fair market value of the property at the time it was "quitclaimed" to B? Gift tax return filed, if required?

3. B "rents" the property to "child". What were the terms? What were the terms of "rental" to "various people"?

What specific tax deductions were taken? Was rental income reported? What does "rent at cost" mean? What costs were covered, considered?

4. B "Quitclaims" property back to A. B "continues to rent it "at cost", paying mortgage (which is non-deductible to B), since B no longer owns the property nor is B obligated on the mortgage. Did B report rental income? B would not be entitled to depreciation deductions either. If B received "rent" tax would be taxable & only operating expenses PAID by B (not mortgage interest or depreciation), would have been deductible by B.

5. 15 years pass. Sounds like B may have claimed non-deductible interest expense. A couldn't deduct as A didn't pay mortgage. What happened when A received 1098 from Mortgagee?

6. A takes over the rental. Was rental income reported? How (where on A's tax return) were deductions claimed?

What was the basis (cost) used for depreciation? Was there an allocation to the value of the non depreciable land made?

7. There's no issue with respect to A only claiming depreciation for the 5 years (out of 15) that A rented the property. If A sells the property to a sibling, A will have a gain or loss based upon the difference between his adjusted tax basis in the property (which sounds like his original cost less the 5 years of depreciation he claimed), unless there was some adjustment at the time of the transfers to & from B (ie. what was the deed consideration for those transfers), or was it nominal?. A would also have a reportable gift (no gift tax due) on Form 709 for the year when the property is sold to the sibling for 50% of the appraised value.

In summary, there's no much of a tax issue (income or gift tax) for the sale by A to his/her Sibling, the only issues are the income tax implications of the period between the initial transfer by A to B and the end of the last period of ownership by A when the property was rented. It is difficult to measure what that income tax exposure might be without knowing what all the figures are and that would be quite a project to figure out; from a practical standpoint, most if not all of those tax years are closed so the only impact would be on the last 3 "open years", and on any subsequent tax years.

Questions?

.

Expert:  Stephen G. replied 1 year ago.

By the way, "a lack of profit motive" would pretty much eliminate any valid tax deductions in excess of rental income, for the entire period where the property was owned by either A or B. Again, mostly closed years.

Expert:  Stephen G. replied 1 year ago.

Do you have any further questions or may I clarify anything for you?

If not, please remember to rate my response at that is the only way we receive credit for our work.

If you'd like to reach me in the future, just ask for "Steve G." at the beginning of your question.

Thanks again for using JustAnswer.com