Are you familiar with the Gallenstein case in regard to real estate after a spouse dies. If so, will you explain it to me?ANSWER:
Yes, I am familitar with the Gallentstein case and, yes, I will try to explain it to you here.
You are referring to the case of Gallenstein v. U.S, 975 F.2d 286 (6th Cir 1992)
In the Gallenstein case, the taxpayer, Mrs. Gallenstein prevailed in a tax
refund suit against the United States
. The government
appealed the decision of the US
District Court judge, arguing that § 2040 of the Internal Revenue Code
("I.R.C.") [26 U.S.C. § 2040], as amended, which governs the value of jointly-owned property
to be included in a decedent's estate for federal estate tax
purposes, requires including only 50% of the value of certain farm property in the taxpayer's deceased husband's estate; and consequently, Mrs. Gallenstein could be taxed on the gain realized in the 50% not included in her husband's estate.
In oppostion, Mrs. Gallenstein contended that that the district court judge properly interpreted I.R.C. § 2040
as requiring 100% of the farm property to be included in her deceased husband's estate. With 100% inclusion, Mrs. Gallentstein received a stepped-up basis for the entire property; and as a consequence, no taxable gain
from the sale.
A full explanation of the case here would simply amount to repeating the explanation given in the court opinion itself. See full opinion at:http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=3505291181358072230
If your question has been satisfactorily answered, please acknowledge by clicking the green “ACCEPT”
button in the upper right hand corner of your screen. After you have accepted, your question will remain open for further dialogue if needed to clarify or elaborate. Also, your positive FEEDBACK comments
are important, so please be sure to add a few words as requested. And I thank you in advance. http://ldgorin.justia.net/index.html
Edited by Lawrence D. Gorin on 4/26/2010 at 6:28 AM EST