How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask Maverick Your Own Question
Maverick, Lawyer
Category: Real Estate Law
Satisfied Customers: 5749
Experience:  20 years professional experience
Type Your Real Estate Law Question Here...
Maverick is online now
A new question is answered every 9 seconds

I have been on a month to month for over a year.Recently I

Customer Question

I have been on a month to month for over a year.Recently I have had the landlord request a $150 rent increase. I have requested rental verification which was good.(for wait list rental) Now she wants 6mo lease. Which puts me in a move in the winter or over $2800 to pay if we move before. So far all is verbal.
We originally were under the impression we may have opportunity to buy so we put time money labor into home $2000. APPROXIMATELY. Now wants to keep in family. Not sure of rights
Submitted: 2 months ago.
Category: Real Estate Law
Expert:  Maverick replied 2 months ago.

Welcome! My name is***** give me a few minutes to analyze and/or research your inquiry and I will be back.

Expert:  Maverick replied 2 months ago.

Under these conditions the LL has a right to ask for $150.00 month rent increase and you have the right to put in a 30 days notice to vacate. The same holds true for the 6 month lease requirement.

If there was not option to buy contract in place which the LL has somehow breached and you put money and labor into the home on your own volition, then you will have to rely on equity to get justice here as opposed to any arguments based in the law. So, you may be able to get the LL to have to repay you for all or some portion of the $2,000 based on the concept of unjust enrichment.

Restitution is a remedy designed to prevent unjust enrichment." Sauner v. Pub. Serv. Auth. of S.C., 354 S.C. 397, 409, 581 S.E.2d 161, 167 (2003); see also Ellis v. Smith Grading & Paving, Inc., 294 S.C. 470, 473, 366 S.E.2d 12, 14 (Ct. App. 1988) ("Unjust enrichment is an equitable doctrine, akin to restitution, which permits the recovery of that amount the defendant has been unjustly enriched at the expense of the plaintiff."). "The terms 'restitution' and 'unjust enrichment' are modern designations for the older doctrine of quasi-contracts." Ellis, 294 S.C. at 473, 366 S.E.2d at 14.

Note: (1) Just Answer’s site disclaimers apply to all levels of service; (2) Most follow-up questions are answered with in the hour; however, if I am not signed on, please allow up to 24 hours; and (3) If we are done, please assign a feedback rating so Just Answer will compensate me for your question. Thank you for using Just Answer.

Related Real Estate Law Questions