How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask Attyadvisor Your Own Question
Attyadvisor, Attorney
Category: Real Estate Law
Satisfied Customers: 6323
Experience:  29 years of experience in General Practice, Real Estate Law and Estate Law.
Type Your Real Estate Law Question Here...
Attyadvisor is online now
A new question is answered every 9 seconds

I a Realtor in Eugene, Oregon. I need help determining if

Customer Question

Hello, I a Realtor in Eugene, Oregon. I need help determining if the actions of HUD asset manager BLB Resources is lawful under federal regulations and HUD policy. This is time sensitive, with an answer needed ASAP.
I submitted a bid on this HUD-owned home on behalf of my son, who would be an owner occupant.
The bid was submitted during the initial 5-day period that was open only to owner-occ buyers. The bid was for $16,000 over asking price, and was all cash. It was specifically labeled as intended to be held as a back-up offers, in the event a higher offer was submitted.
Shortly after submittal, I received a notice that another bid was higher, and had been selected.
But four days later (yesterday), I received another notice saying the property had been relisted for sale. Sure enough, the home was back on the HUD store this morning. Only this time, bids were being accepted from ALL buyers, not just owner-occ.
I called asset manager BLB Resources, and asked what happened. I was told that the winning bidder had backed out. This is easy to do, since all that’s needed to make a bid is name, SSN and price. No earnest money, no binding commitment.
I why my son’s bid was not accepted, since it was labeled as a backup offer, exceeded the HUD ask price, and was (according to BLB) the highest after the failed bid was withdrawn. I was told that instead of taking it was a backup offer, BLB had cancelled it instead. Therefore, with no winning bids in the initial 5-day period, the home was now eligible to enter the open market, free of the owner-occ restriction.
I was advised that BLB had the power to decide not to accept backup offers, and that HUD policy was not to take backups on HUD “uninsurable” homes, which this one is. However, when I pressed them for where they obtained their authority, for how they knew HUD wanted my son’s bid discarded, all they could tell me was that this was standard HUD practice.
I was advised that our only option is to resubmit a new bid, and it would be re-evaluated. However, with the property now open to investors, it’s doubtful we could prevail.
I am not seeing how BLB’s actions square with HUD regulations, that specify that owner-occs are to be given priority. That higher bid that beat my son’s bid was not real. In fact, it may have even been fraudulent – made with the express intention of knocking out the owner-occ bid period and opening it up to investors.
I want BLB to accept my son’s bid, and not proceed with accepting new bids. Help please – do you see anything in the CFRs that make BLB’s actions challengeable? See CFR subsections (a) and (c). CFR rules are here:
Asset manager handbook is here, see especially bottom of page 27:
Submitted: 9 months ago.
Category: Real Estate Law
Expert:  Attyadvisor replied 9 months ago.

Sorry this posted on the wrong link.