Real Estate Law
Ask a Real Estate Law Question, Get an Answer ASAP!
No I am the seller. The buyer sent me two invoices yesterday for $18K worth of sewer replacement work and asked what do I want to do with it? That's it.
BTW, I also talked to the buyers real estate agent who suggested they obtain an attorney if they wish to claim non-disclosure. But at this time they did not have a specific request from me other than - what do I want to do with these 2 invoices.
I would be happy to provide you with a link for attorneys in your area that can assist in post closing disclosure matters. http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/bought-home-with-defects-whos-30058.html
Can I clarify your answer?
YES - we were aware of blockage and backup of sewer system but inadvertently did not describe in detail even though disclosure form required this. The issue is the failure to disclose certain matters fully. California Civil Code Section 1102 et seq. requires the seller disclose any material defects that they are aware of at the time of the sale.
I agree we need to disclose material defects but there was no material defect that I was aware of. Snaking the line and cleaning out the sewer does not constitute material in my mind. As far as I was concerned, the sewers were working fine? You would still consider that material?
On the transfer document we answered NO to are we aware of any MATERIAL defects in the operation of the sewer line.
The material fact is the inadvertent failure to disclose plumbing issues with the toilets and the failure to go into detail on the disclosure forms. These are small issues comparison not to disclosing the blockage at all. These matters can go either way. The fact that an inspection revealed nothing goes a long way to support your position. You can certainly move forward with a lawsuit if one is filed and stand by the fact that you were unaware of a blockage that would require the replacement of the entire sewer system. Purchaser's often feel the need to have someone pay for the problems they encounter in a home purchase. If you feel strongly that you provided enough information I would have no problem backing you if I was your attorney and taking the position that enough information was disclosed and that the purchaser waived any inspection matters after the inspection period passed. If you want to be prepared for a potential lawsuit (that hopefully never gets filed) I can provide you for attorneys in the area that work on these types of matters. As attorneys we always prepare for the worst case scenario and work toward the best outcome for our client.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).