Hello: I need to have your help to clarity of the rights to wheelchair bound, handicapped residents of the City of Alexandria, VA to "VAN Accessible" parking or, more specifically, parking spaces next to "hatch line" areas to enable City residents to approach their vehicle, take down and reassemble wheelchairs so that they may enter and exit the vehicle unimpeded. I need to know if my husband has any right under ADA, Fair Housing or City laws that allow him to be assigned a specific parking space next to a "hatch lined" area because he is confined to a wheelchair. We are residents in a large condo complex in the City of Alexandria and, according to a new ruling set forth by the Board of Directors of the Condominium Unit Owners Association subject to City laws for disabled, handicap and VAN Accessible parking vs any Association or real estate rules that may govern the same issue on private property. We bought our condo five years ago--there were two garage spaces included with the originally planned purchase but because my husband could not make use of either space that accompanied the condo, we told the sellers that we wanted only one of the spaces and the second space was sold to another resident. My husband is a paraplegic, paralyzed from mid thorax downward as a result of a spinal cord injury 20 years ago. He resides in a wheelchair. He is 70 years old. Post accident, in order for him to return to work and new form of living, he was taught to drive a car with hand controls and to take down and reassemble his wheelchair to stow in the back seat of a two door vehicle while he was a patient at the National Rehabilitation Hospital in Washington DC. The same skills were taught to individuals who were quadriplegic but had ability of movement and strength of their upper extremities due to the location of their spinal cord damage and did not want to or could not mange driving a van; other patients chose vans for personal reasons. The patients had a choice of the type of personal use vehicle they would learn how to drive. One year ago, our condominium Association Management began allocating exclusive "VAN Accessible" parking spaces to wheelchair bound residents with vans. My husband wrote to the Property Management to request a handicap space next to a "hatch line" area based on equal need: room for him to enter and exit his vehicle with his wheel chair--so that he could perform activities of daily living. His car and his wheelchair are his only means of mobility. Property Management informed him there was no formal process for granting of "reasonable accommodation", and requested he write to the Property Management and the Association Board of Directors to explain the rationale for need of a parking space next to a "hatch lined" area in order to have unobstructed, consistent access to his vehicle, space to take down and reassemble his chair as necessary to drive his car. The space was granted. Now, due to a change in Property Management policy, generated by the Association Board of Directors to provide fair and equal access to handicap parking spaces under Alexandria City laws for reasonable accommodation, my husband was told he had to either surrender his handicap parking space or sign his rights to the garage parking space back to the Association for their disposition and use at their discretion. He was told he could either use the designated space he had been granted or the garage space we "own" but not both. He was told by Property Management that he must park his vehicle in "other handicap spaces" or in the common area parking to assure equal treatment of all handicapped residents under laws. He is unable to use the garage parking space because there is no room for him to enter or exit his vehicle with his wheelchair--the decision was made to surrender the handicap parking space leaving him to search for parking spaces in the common area of parking that were wide enough to accommodate access and wheelchair takedown Handicapped residents with vans who do not "own" a garage space are not affected by the new management initiative; they can remain in the VAN Accessible slot because not having it assigned means that they will have to occupy two parking spaces. Unless there is a parking space next to a water run-off area near our building, which are wider than other parking spaces, he is limited if not prohibited from use of his vehicle without (1) being subject to assistance from Patrol Services to locate the resident whose vehicle is in the space next to his to move their vehicle or (2) have an ambulatory person unlock and back his car out of the parking space so that he may enter and or exit the driver's side door if I am not available to assist him. Do you have any suggestions to guide us through this issue? My husband has the same challenges that any spinal cord injured driver has--the same challenges that van driver's experience. Kind Regards, XXXXX XXXXX Kercher
Thank you so much for using JustAnswer.com. I truly aim to please you as a customer, but please keep in mind that I do not know what you already know or don't know, or with what you need help, unless you tell me. If I did not answer the question you thought you were asking, please respond with the specific question you wanted answered. PLEASE use REPLY to EXPERT if you would like more information or if you feel something was not included in your answer.
Kindly remember the ONLY WAY experts receive any credit at all for spending time with customers is if you click on OK, GOOD or EXCELLENT SERVICE even though you have made a deposit or are a subscription customer. YOU MUST COMPLETE THE RATING FOR THE EXPERT TO RECEIVE ANY CREDIT, if not the site keeps your money on deposit.
Also remember, sometimes the law does not support what we want it to support, but that is not the fault of the person answering the question, so please be courteous.
PLEASE NOTE WELL WE ARE DEALING WITH LAWS OF 50 STATES PLUS FEDERAL LAWS, AS WELL AS DEALING WITH OTHER CUSTOMERS, SO PLEASE BE PATIENT AND BE ASSURED YOU ARE NOT BEING IGNORED.
There can also be a delay of an hour or more in between my answers because I may be taking a break.
You can always request me through my profile at http://www.justanswer.com/law/expert-paulmjd/ or beginning your question with “For PaulMJD…”
Thank you for the information which is most helpful. We had a time limit for response regarding our parking "choice" imposed by the Board of Directors and have surrendered the assigned handicap parking space. We intend to meet with the Board of Directors and Property Management and my next concern is that when I bring the facts you gave me to the Board of Directors, I am certain that they will reply that they gave my husband reasonable accommodation by allowing him the choice to either keep his assigned handicap space or the garage space--but not both-- the issue is now that he could have the assigned handicap space but ONLY if we agreed to sign the rights to the garage space that we own over to the Association for discretionary use. It seems that if we had elected to keep the handicapped space, we literally would have "purchased" $12K worth of rights for handicapped parking in a "common area" that could be revoked when a new Board of Directors is elected--the $12K we spent on the garage parking would be "gone" because we had to sign it over to the Association who would, in return, lease it to another resident. You have given me rationale to defend the rights for the assigned handicap space in the common area but I don't know how to defend keeping the parking space we own and the assigned handicap space ---because he cannot access the garage space or his vehicle in the garage space. The building is 35 years old so not subject to ruling of 1991. Can you help me to defend both issues? Again, I feel like we are being robbed by having to choose between a space we paid for and a space in a common area that the next Board of Directors could revoke at will.
I am back with additional thoughts and I need your help with more clarification regarding (1) reasonable accommodation and, ( 2)specific circumstances about parking in our condo development.
I understand the rights under ADA and FHA as you have explained them to me and will use them to fight for an appropriate parking space for my husband. But after reading your interpretation of a course of action about the loss of a parking space we paid for—I am really confused. Recall that the Association of Condominium Unit Owners Board of Directors required us to surrender to them our rights to a parking space in the garage for which we paid $12K in order to keep an exclusively assigned handicapped parking space: they stated we could not keep both spaces.
Less than a year ago,the previous Board of Directors had approved the Property Management’s request on behalf of my husband to grant him an exclusive van accessible slot to allow access space to enter and exit his car with his wheelchair. The grant was approved and the space was his until one week ago because we have a new Board of Directors who have revoked the grant; we did not agree nor will we surrender our garage space and have returned the van accessible slot to the common area (took down our permit sign). We paid for the garage space four years ago and shall retain it; we have lost trust in Property Management and the Board of Directors due to their latest decision that has resulted in the loss of my husband’s freedom of mobility.
My husband now has had to return to the same set of conditions he was in a year ago—the daily sorting of where he can park his car due to limited availability of wheelchair accessible parking and the narrowness of the standard disabled slots.
IF we had given the rights to the garage space that we own to the Association and kept the exclusively assigned outdoor slot, we would have essentially paid $12K for the space while other handicapped residents parked beside us in their vans at no cost-- in a van accessible handicapped space marked for their exclusive use. Handicapped spaces are in the common area; because we paid nothing nor were we charged for the exclusively assigned handicapped space, logic would follow that the resident using the assigned space next to us has not paid the Association for the privilege either---yet we would have given up a $12K parking spot.
When we bought our condo, there were two garage spaces included in the package--each priced at $12K. We bought one of the spaces for $12K, which was included in our mortgage. The condo seller sold the second garage space to another resident for $12K; we declined the offer of the remaining space because neither allowed wheelchair access to vehicles. I use our space to park my car.
IF I understand and apply the FHA and ADA correctly then there are two scenarios that do not seem quite fair. They are as follows:
In accordance with FHA and ADA, residents of our condo development who are handicapped may park in any spot designated for handicapped use, including a van accessible spot. Residents driving vans either park in a van accessible spot or occupy two to three parking spaces so that their chair ramp can be lowered to an access area to enter and exit the vehicle. Because parking in the common area is at a premium, handicapped drivers are encouraged by Patrol Services to park in a space that is not labeled van accessible. Each of the four buildings in the development has two to three van accessible spots for every 22-23 parking spaces. Currently, at least four residents of the handicapped population who drive vans have exclusively assigned parking in a van accessible space.
Since we did not pay for but were granted exclusive use of a van accessible space for wheelchair access, it follows any wheelchair bound resident who bought a condo and drives a van and parks in the common area pays nothing for the space because they drive a van-- and if the space is exclusively assigned by Property Management to the handicapped resident, we now question if there is a monthly assessment fee paid by the occupant---as we did not pay any fee for the space assigned to my husband. We must, however, pay the Association Property Management an additional $20 per month assessment fee for the use of the garage space we bought.
With the circumstances we have presented, it seems that the Association has failed to provide reasonable accommodation for my husband to have wheelchair access to his car. After examining several scenarios, circumstances suggest that wheelchair bound van owners are given preference to van accessible spaces because to park elsewhere would involve the use of two or more slots in the common area parking where spaces are at a premium, limited and un-reserved.
In order to provide reasonable accommodation for my husband and for him to have handicapped access equal to other wheelchair bound residents who drive a vehicle, one of the following options must be considered.
The Property Management and Board of Directors may:
If the handicapped van owners do not pay an assessment fee or a purchase price for an exclusively reserved handicapped space in the common element, then we are being treated differently based on the same disability and penalized for the type of vehicle my husband chose to learn to drive.
If handicapped van owners who own garage space and are secured a van accessible slot according to ADA and FHA, then according to the Acts we are being treated differently because my wheelchair bound husband has been told he must surrender a $12K garage space we own to the Association in exchange for a van accessible slot he should have been assigned through reasonable accommodation.
Spinal cord injured drivers have a choice what vehicle they will learn to drive while in the rehabilitation setting. My husband chose to drive a small car but he has the same challenges as van drivers and is not receiving equal treatment or consideration by the Association or Property Management.
Please advise me if I am correct in my understanding and application of the FHA and ADA with regard to reasonable accommodation. Please advise me if my approach to saving my parking space and not losing $12K would carry any weight under condominium laws.
Thank you for your help. We will see what the Association has to say to us before we discuss what wrongs they have done. If they do not agree to one of our proposals, we will go forward with a HUD complaint and consider suit under FHA or ADA. Appreciate your time and quick responses.
I just read through what I could understand of the Virginia Condominium Act and it seems to say that Condominium Unit Owners Associations through their Board of Directors have the right to determine how limited common area spaces are used by unit owners. The space in the limited common area conveyed with our condo unit when purchased.
Under the Virginia Condo Act, can the Board of Directors force us to return our garage space to the Association for use at their discretion, lose the $12K in order accommodate my husband's disability--which he is already allowed under ADA and FHA?
I have contacted you, the ADA and HUD--who all state that by removing my husband's wheelchair accessible parking, the Association is in violation of the FHA and ADA. I have filed a report to the intake office at the City of Alexandria Office of Human Rights for discrimination based on disability and await their response to determine if we really have a valid complaint; I filed a report after reading the Virginia Condominium Act 2007. We did not pay the Association to use an exclusive handicap parking space that was assigned to my husband therefore neither do the vans parked in the exclusively reserved van accessible slots. Yet we are told we must give up the handicapped accessible space OR lose $12K that we paid for the garage space.Do I need a lawyer before I speak to the Association Board of Directors? or do we really have any rights under the Virginia Condominium Act? My husband refused to sign over the garage space and lost his exclusively assigned parking because of the money we would lose if we signed a Licensing Agreement.Kind regards,Janis KercherCity of Alexandria VA
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).