Thank you for choosing Just Answer.
-Could you explain your situation a little more?
Did you file an answer to the foreclosure complaint ?
Did you answer list any defenses to the foreclosure ?
What were l they.
Were the judgments handed down as part of a "default judgment"
Were the judgment handed down as part of a summary judgment ?
Did you respond to either the default judgment or summary judgment ?
I will be better able to assist you if you could answer the above.
Pricepe and Summary Judgment were both handled and answered PRO-SE based on the Overwhelming evidence. This information was submitted to the courts back in "11". No one on our side was ever informed of a court date for the Judge in "11", even though a judgment notice came in favor of the BANKS the day after Thanksgiving "011"? Hmm? Is that legal after we followed all the legal steps and the banks and their servcer henchman have not? 2013 has yet to bring this fruadulent froeclosure mess to an end when will it stop!!!!
Your avenue to appeal summary judgment was in 2011, and a rehearing based on fraudulent evidence of the Plaintiff probably expired in late 2012.
Summary judgment is not about overwhelming evidence. It is about establishing that a question of fact exists that is material to the action. You as the respondent in most cases cannot win a case through plaintiff's motion for summary judgment. The judge should have in his ruling identified what was reviewed and the basis for his/her ruling.
I don't have the benefit of seeing what the summary judgment brief stated and what your response stated. So, I am guessing as to what may have happened. But, in order for the judge to find for the plaintiff he must assume your evidence presented with your opposition memorandum was factual and in the best light for you,. The judge ruled that assuming your evidence was factual and viewed in your favor you still have no legal basis to win. OR in the alternative your evidence was not proper either in form, or in content so it was not considered. I also suspect you did not ask for oral argument on your summary judgment response. In either case you need to read the judges ruling to see what happened.
It is not mandatory that a hearing is held for summary judgment and it is quite possible the judge ruled without holding a hearing. You should look at the court's docket to see if a summary judgment hearing was held.
At this point you will need to engage local counsel to review what happened. After 2 years however, most of you legal avenues to contest the ruling are gone.
I am truly sorry this has happened to you. This is why it is highly recommended that an attorney is hired to protect your rights.
Please rate my response appropriately so I may receive credit for my answer.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).