If the old fence has been in there for a period of at least ten years, then it may be sufficient to establish title through adverse possession. For instance, see the lexis summary of Weaver v. Helm, 941 S.W.2d 801:
When a dispute arose about the boundary line between the parties' property, the title owner bulldozed the fence and replaced it with one on the line he claimed was the actual property line. The adverse possessors brought suit to determine the actual property line, whether it was the old fence line that had been there for 40 years or the new fence line. The court affirmed the trial court's determination that the adverse possessors were entitled to a portion of the disputed property. The court held that the possessors proved all the elements of adverse possession: possession that was hostile and under a claim of right, actual, open and notorious, exclusive, and continuous for 10 years. The court held that intent to deprive the title owner was shown by the possessor's mistaken belief as to the facts of legal ownership. The court further held that starting with the presumption that the trial court's judgment was correct and the title owner had the burden to show otherwise, the record did not establish that the description of the property in the judgment was not based upon the evidence.
Although, "Of course, a landowner who puts his fence inside his boundary line does not thereby lose title to the strip on the other side. That loss would occur only if his neighbor should take possession of the strip and hold it for the requisite period of years." Harris v. Lynch, 940 S.W.2d 42
So much of it will depend upon the specific facts in your case. If the fence has been relied upon as the boundary line and has been there for more than 10 years, then there seems to be a presumption of that being the line.
I hope that helps. Please let me know if you have additional questions.
I can locate more cases for you if you like. Would you mind telling me a little more about the factual scenario and what kind of cases you are looking for? I am sorry that your neighbor is unwilling to work with you.
Regarding the price, that is completely up to you. You have already accepted the first answer (which I appreciate) and are under no obligation to accept further answers. Any time you accept an answer on our site, the amount will be the original amount that you posted for the question ($20) and will be deducted from any deposit you have made.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).