Imagine there was a legal challenge to the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Bush v. Gore, 531 U.S. 98 (2000), where a U.S. District Judge issued a ruling stating that the success of plaintiff's claims necessarily requires the invalidation of the current presidency of George W. Bush. This ruling sets forth the evidence proving that the U.S. Supreme Court is not sitting in good behavior IAW Article III, Sec. 1, and tGeorge W. Bush was not legally and lawfully elected to the Office of the President IAW Article II, Sec. 1, cl 3, and the 12th Amendment. Q: Who presides over the Impeachment of the President of the United States, when the Chief Justice, and all associate justices on the U.S. Supreme Court are being Impeached at the same time, and there is not one Article III, judge currently seated that is sitting in good behavior, as their inability to detect plain constitutional error in the Bush v. Gore decision proves that they have aided the facilitation of High Treason, whether based upon ignorance or malice; thereby proving the commission of a High Crime, and Impeahable Offense?

Legal Citations of Interest:

Walter Lee v. District of Columbia, 531 U.S. 1054, 1186, (2000), cert. denied 11 Dec 00, reh. denied 20 Feb 01, and petition to introduce new evidence denied on12 Apr 06.

Walter Lee v. John Ashcroft, No. 01-2610 - Filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on18 Dec 01, by U.S. District Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson