The LLC is in Maryland.

Okay. But, the claim made against the majority owner is: An owner cannot fire another owner out of hand. There was no discussion. No board meeting. Nothing. The door was simply locked and the majority owner considered it "case closed." The pending matter in small claims court, because that's the only venue we can work in at this time, is based on ownership, shareholder, and loss of Officer Salary. This case has been deliberately set up to be focused on loss of salary and the lockout. I know that there are other cases that could follow this case. Your answer goes to the fact that the member, who was denied equity, would be able to go against the company for dissolution or buy out. Is that an accurate summarization of your explanation and my best explanation of what I understand?