Hello,
What do you mean by deficiency on an account? If this a contract matter where someone owes you money? Or has someone taken money out of an bank account?
Thanks.
Matt
I hope you have a better understanding of your question as a result of my comments. I am sorry if the answer is not what you would prefer, but as you know, sometimes the correct answer is good news, other times bad. I hope you have a better understanding of your legal issue as a result of my comments. If the information given in fact answered your question please click the GREEN "ACCEPT" button NOW, so that I receive credit for my work. If you need additional clarification on this question, don't hesitate to click "Reply" and I will be happy to help you. Please give me as much detail as you can so that I can respond after receiving all the relevant details. If you would like to have me help with further questions, you can request me personally in your question caption.
I work for a finance company. We repossessed a car, it was in such bad repair it only went for two thousand at aution. That leaves a deficiency of 17542.00 on the account that they still owe. I need to file a civil claim in order to get a money judgement and garnigh the customer's wages
Ok, then you need to file a Complaint for Breach of Contract and request the damages for the deficiency, any filing fees and court costs and any attorney's fees if you hire one.
This is a link to a CA Complaint for Breach of Contract that you can fill in with your info.
http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/forms/fillable/pldc0011.pdf
This is the basic format of the Complaint:
David Jordan, Esq. State Bar # 69052LAW OFFICES OF DAVID JORDAN 222 West Broadway, Suite 500 GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA 91201 (XXX) XXX-XXXX
Attorney for Plaintiff FRED FLINTSTONE
MUNICIPAL COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIAFOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
FRED FLINTSTONE
v.
BARNEY RUBLE
COMPLAINT FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT,MONEY HAD AND RECEIVED AND FRAUDCOMES NOW, the PLAINTIFF FRED FLINTSTONE and alleges and complains as follows:. FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT1. Plaintiff is and at all times mentioned herein was an individual who resides in the County, and City of Los Angeles, of California. 2. Defendant is an individual and resident of Los Angeles, California.3. The true names and capacities, whether individual, corporate, associate, or otherwise of defendants named herein as Does 1 through 50, inclusive, are unknown to plaintiff who therefore sues these defendants by such fictitious names. Plaintiff will amend this Complaint to show the true names and capacities of these defendants when the same have been ascertained. Plaintiff is informed and believes that each fictitiously named defendant is responsible in law and in fact for the obligations alleged herein.Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges that at all relevant times each of the defendants was acting within the scope and course of his or her agency and employment.4. The contract upon which this action is based was made and was to be performed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. That contract provides that the County of Los Angeles is the proper venue for any action arising out of the agreement. The contract provides for an award of reasonable attorneys' fees to the prevailing party in any dispute arising out of the contract.5. On or about July 19, 1996, plaintiff and defendants and each of them, entered into an oral agreement whereby plaintiff agreed to loan defendants, and each of them, the sum of $60,000 plus interest at the legal rate which defendants were to repay at the time of the sale of defendant Lloyd's home in Southern California. 6. Plaintiff has performed all of the conditions, covenants and promises required by it to be performed in accordance with the terms and conditions of the contract, by loaning to defendants, and each of them, the aforementioned sum of $60,000.7. Defendants, and each of them, breached their oral agreement with plaintiff by failing and refusing to perform in good faith their promise to sell the home in Southern California and by withdrawing said home from the real estate market.8. As a result of the breach of the defendants, and each of them, in the obligations pursuant to the oral contract, the entire sum of $60,000 loaned to defendants, and each of them, is now due, owing, and unpaid. Demand has been made on defendants, and each of them, for repayment but defendants, and each of them have failed and refused and continue to fail and refuse, to repay the sum loaned by plaintiff.9. Defendants, and each of them, have therefore breached their oral contract with plaintiff, who has been damaged thereby in the sum of $60,000 plus interest at the legal rate from and after the date due according to proof.SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION FOR MONEY HAD AND RECEIVED10. Plaintiff realleges and incorporates by reference each and every allegation contained in paragraphs one through ten above.11. On or about July 19, 1996 at Los Angeles, California, defendants, and each of them, became indebted to plaintiff in the sum of $60,000 for money lent by plaintiff to defendants, and each of them, at their instance and request.12. No part of the sum loaned has been repaid, although payment has been demanded, leaving the balance due, owing, and unpaid to plaintiffs in the amount of $60,000 plus interest at the legal rate from and after July 19, 1996.THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION FOR FRAUD13. Plaintiff realleges and incorporates by reference each and every allegation contained in paragraphs one through thirteen above.14. On or about July 19, 1996 at Los Angeles, California, defendants and each of them represented to plaintiff that they would use their best efforts to sell the Southern California home to repay plaintiff. These representations were false and defendants knew the falsity of these statements at the time they were made.15. Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges that defendants, and each of them, had no intention to sell the Southern California home, and immediately withdrew said home from the real estate market upon receipt of the proceeds from the loan.16. Plaintiff relied on the representations of defendant and would not have made the loan otherwise.17. Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges that defendants, and each of them, withdrew the home from the market for the specific purpose of depriving plaintiff of its funds, to harass plaintiff in its business, and to defraud plaintiff, all with malice toward plaintiff.Plaintiff has been injured by loss of use of the funds, loss of reputation, and an inability to compete in the market without the use of said funds. Plaintiff seeks compensatory damages in the amount of $75,000 for said acts.18. These acts were malicious, fraudulent and oppressive, justifying an award of punitive damages so that defendants and each of them will not engage in such conduct in the future and make an example of them.
WHEREFORE PLAINTIFF PRAYS for judgment against defendants, and each of them as follows:1. For the sum of $60,000 for breach of contract and the value of its performance.2. For interest thereon at the legal rate from and after July 19, 1996.3. For $75,000 general damages for defendants' fraud.4. For punitive damages according to proof.5. For reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred herein.6. For such other and further relief as the court may deem just and proper.
This is the basic form it takes and you fill in your own info and "tell your story" in the Complaint. You have to file it Superior Court and have it served on the Defendant. Then they have 20 days to answer or you can get a default judgment. If they answer, then it will get set for a pretrial where you will talk with the judge or a mediator to see if there is any settlement possibility. If not, then it will get set for a trial at a later date. Thanks.MAtt I hope you have a better understanding of your question as a result of my comments. I am sorry if the answer is not what you would prefer, but as you know, sometimes the correct answer is good news, other times bad. I hope you have a better understanding of your legal issue as a result of my comments. If the information given in fact answered your question please click the GREEN "ACCEPT" button NOW, so that I receive credit for my work. If you need additional clarification on this question, don't hesitate to click "Reply" and I will be happy to help you. Please give me as much detail as you can so that I can respond after receiving all the relevant details. If you would like to have me help with further questions, you can request me personally in your question caption.
This is the basic form it takes and you fill in your own info and "tell your story" in the Complaint. You have to file it Superior Court and have it served on the Defendant. Then they have 20 days to answer or you can get a default judgment. If they answer, then it will get set for a pretrial where you will talk with the judge or a mediator to see if there is any settlement possibility. If not, then it will get set for a trial at a later date.
MAtt
Attorney
9 years experience in real estate, estate planning, and criminal law