JustAnswer > Legal
Ask A Question|Register|Login|Help
JustAnswer

Law

Ask a Legal Question, Get an Answer ASAP!

Have your own Legal question?

22 Lawyers are Online Now
characters left:
Not a Legal Question?

Related Law Topics:

  • Eye
  • ,
  • Far
  • ,
  • Law
  • ,
  • May
  • ,
  • Lot
  • ,
  • Run
  • ,
  • Sue
  • ,
  • Two
  • ,
  • Cash
  • ,
  • Come
Bookmark and Share

Question

Two acquaintances are in a lawsuit over mismanagement of a Limited Partnership. One is the General Mgr, the other an investor/LP. The LP believes he is in the right and can show fiduciary malfeasance/fraud if he gets the GM to turn over certain financial records. The GM is spending heavily to prevent this. My question: the limited partner asked my opinion on what I thought of the GM actions, knowing I was privy to some inside information. I replied via email that I had some very strong, and very negative, opinions of his business conduct and that it was my personal speculation that likely he was involved in very unsavory practices. This was all firmly identified as only my personal OPINIONS and SPECULATIONS however it was VERY inflammatory and damning. I wrote him in the context of a personal and confidential exchange, expressing only my OPINIONS. The emails are now being demanded in discovery. Is there any likelihood of the GM finding actionable defamatory conduct from my emails?

Submitted: 77 days and 23 hours ago.
Category: Legal
Value: $58
Status: CLOSED
+
Read More

Optional Information

State/Country relating to Question: Nevada

Already Tried:
Tried to get the GM to drop any interest in seeking any further information from me as I already explained to him verbally the basic content of the emails in question. He has continued to move for them to be disclosed in discovery.

Posted by Mary Meaden Esq 77 days and 23 hours ago.

Info Request

What state are you located in?

What type of business is this?

Is the General Manager the General Partner?

Is this investor a large investor? Any idea what percentage is and how many other investors their are?

This information that you mention you have -- is it from your personal (friendship) relationship with the GM or from a business relationship?

77 days and 23 hours ago.

Reply

I am in Colorado. The Partnership is located/formed in Nevada. The LP who filed the suit is in North Carolina. It is still a civil action, the agreived LP believes he may uncover evidence leading it into a criminal realm.

It is a publishing enterprise producing a periodical.

Yes, the GM is the general partner. The agreived LP is one of, IIRC, 6 other LP's. The GM has just had him forcibly removed from the Partnership by maneuvering with the other LP's to after-the-fact rewrite the Partnerships codiciles. He has tried any number of tactics to stop the filed action, including this most recent attempt to deny standing. I believe the agreived LP owned about 1/10th originally.

My information comes from my longterm friendship with another of the Partners; over the course of aproximately 9 years he confided in me a lot of unsavory details about how the GM ran things and hid the performance details of the LLP from all the Partners. It goes deeper, but you get the basic gist of what I know. I was also "friendly" with the GM at one, serving as write for the peridodical they produced. Everybody involved knows everybody.

Posted by Mary Meaden Esq 77 days and 22 hours ago.

Info Request

One last question: Is the lawsuit in Nevada Court? If not, then where was it filed?

This will take a bit of research because it touches and may concern three states. Do you need an answer immediately, or is it acceptable to you to give me a few hours to take a look at this issue. I may come up with something quickly, but in the event that it takes me a while, is that acceptable?

Just Answer will notify you via email if I have more questions or if I post an answer.

77 days and 22 hours ago.

Reply

Filed in Clark County, Nevada. Yes.

Take all the time you need! Please.

I am most concerned with what the GM could legally do given the penchant for seeking restribution, which he has made clear is his goal. What I said was my clearly indetified in the emails as my personal opinions and I made VERY clear that it was not to be construed in any other way. I am **reasonably** secure that it, likley, is immune to defamation/slander/libel conduct definitions as it was a private exchange that was never rendered in a public forum and should be 'protected speech' as I understand the legalities.

Posted by Mary Meaden Esq 77 days and 22 hours ago.

Info Request

Ok. I also want to see if there is any way to tell them they don't need them in the discovery.

I am a couple of hours behind your time zone, so if you can keep an eye on your email in case I have further questions? If I don't have any further questions, I am working on your issue and should have an answer by tomorrow afternoon/early evening (maybe sooner).   

If another expert pops in, please tell them that you are working with me and I am researching your issue. Thanks.

77 days and 22 hours ago.

Reply

Thanks!

FYI....the lawyer for the LP who filed the original suit has advised his client to turn over all email records requested by the GM's lawyer (the GM has a laundry list of people he is demanding emails from, not just me. He is admittedly on a fishing expedition here, and desperate). So far, this is not under a Courts order, only the GM's lawyer demanding to see them all. The LP's lawyer does not want to seem like they are hiding anything, so is advising turning it all over as a matter of course without a fight.

The LP passed on to me the information that I could file a petition/motion to the Court to ask to be removed from the list requiring disclosure of certain emails, but that they felt it was fruitless as it would likely be denied. I find that very hard to believe knowing the exchanges were private, confidential, voiced opions/speculations only, offered no merit/value to the discovery action or course affecting the case directly, and came from an uninterested third party in a third state.

I realize "you can sue anybody for anything", but I am curious as to what a competent Attorney would advise his client, in this case the Attorney representing the GM here, as to potential for likely success/actionable cause from my private exchanges to this LP. I have gotten both sides so far, legal advice-wise, on this question from a couple other lawyers....one saying I may have a certain liability here, another saying it is utterly ludicrous to think any Judge would even entertain such a case brought before him. IOW's would a competent Attorney likley tell this GM who is out for blood that he has any chance of making a sucessful case against what I believe falls under the protected/private speech guidelines? Having already gotten competing answers on this potential.....I am confused and looking for a tie-breaker answer!!

I will be continue to monitor my email for awhile longer tonight. No worries if I don't get your reply till tomorrow. I will inform any others who pop in you have the case!

Posted by Mary Meaden Esq 77 days and 21 hours ago.

Info Request

Thanks. If you think of any more info in the meantime, feel free to pop it in.

77 days and 21 hours ago.

Reply

The LLP was originally formed in another (fourth)state; it was suddenly moved almost overnight to Nevada shortly after the LP began to make official inquiries/demands to be "shown the books" of the Partnership. These demands preceeded the filing of the actual lawsuit by a couple years.

The meat of what I disclosed to the LP was that it was my well considered opinion that the GM packed up and overnight moved the whole operation to Nevada to seek the better legal protections offered by Nevada as opposed to the original location, in a direct attempt to quash any efforts of the LP to get a look at the books of the LLP as his membership allowed him to under the forming rules. This move was critical to the whole scenario. In an unrelated issue, immediately preceeding this move I had been in negotiations with the GM to come to work for another of his businesses in the original state, there was never any mention of a possible move to Nevada, ever. Once that happened, and it happened litterally over a weekend basically, the whole job-offer was never mentioned again and when I inquired I got stonewalled and told "they HAD to move to Nevada". This festered in my mind for a couple years as being very strange and largely unexplainable on the surface. When the LP started to tell me what he had been doing behind the scenes in trying to examine the LLP's financials, it all clicked and made perfect sense finally. I am paraphrasing a lot here, but you will understand how I was able to make a well-considered speculation then to the LP that his uncomfortable inquiries into the financials of the LLP had litterally forced the GM to move the operation to Nevada to try and build an inpenetrable legal wall around it all and prevent the LP from getting any incriminating evidence. That was what I laid out in detail to the LP in my emails, as my personal opinions and personal speculations, that the whole move to Nevada was forced to happen by his initiating his inquiries into the financial health of the LLP overall. I further speculated the GM had been using and continued to use the LLP as form of "cash cow" for his benefit or the benefit of his other related businesses. Maybe fact, maybe not.....but I certainlu had every reason to believe it as true in light of all the information I had access to at the time. I never actually accused, by actual words, anything like "embezzlement" but I madeit clear that in my mind at least, in my opinion, all the circumstantial evidence called into obvious question his fiduciary responsibilities.

Like I said, inflammatory and damning, but all rendered in a confidential and private exchange and CLEARLY delineated as ONLY my opinions and speculations.

So, there you have the meat of the issue. Comments/advice???

Thanks!

77 days and 1 hours ago.

Reply

Mary,
...any luck yet on advice/answerto my question from last night? ;-)

Thx!

Posted by Mary Meaden Esq 77 days ago.

Answer

Am working on a number of things, including this research. I apologize for the delay but will have an anser in here for you by tomorrow (am about half way through it).

Sorry for the inconvenience.

77 days ago.

Reply

No problem, just curious. Let me know what you come up with! THX!

Accepted Answer

Hello Again Tact Adv. Thanks for your patience and your additional information. Overall, after reviewing all of your information here and the law of Nevada regarding discovery (and LLP's) I just do not feel that they have a leg to stand on regarding a number of things.

First, as far as a lawsuit being filed for libel/defamation, etc., -- you are absolutely correct in that the emails were private exchanges and are statements of personal opinion -- there is nothing actionable there (which does not mean that they will not try--in which case you would have to hire a lawyer to request that any such suit be thrown out of court on a motion to dismiss). I was researching whether or not your having a business relationship with the parties invovled may have made a difference (sort of an "insider's" free speech restriction, if you will -- and I have found nothing to indicate that you should have any conerns on that front). For this, I am assuming that you could not be found to be an "expert" or an "expert witness" to this case -- eg, in order to be considered an "expert" in this overall case, you would hve to have broad inside knowledge of the LLP's financial dealings, so that your opinion would be regarded as one of the major points of the lawsuit. You would have to be the company's in-house long-term accountant or CEO or some such in order to qualify as an "expert" here. Based on the facts you have given me, you are simply an employee (or independent contractor) voicing opinions regarding how the company was run and why it may have been moved to Nevada.

Why they even want your emails in this lawsuit is puzzling -- unless, as you said, they are hoping that it leads to other discoverable information. Your emails are simply personal opinion and may even be termed "good gossip" but do not seem to arise to anything they could actually use in court. Unless, as I said earlier, your involvement in this whole thing elevates you to the level of an "expert" on the LLP -- they would have to bring you in to testify so that you can "authenticate" the emails to the court ("yes, I wrote them") and then they would have to offer the contents of the emails up as evidence. And the court will ask "What are these evidence of, counselor?" -- and the judge will determine that the emails are your personal opinion and, unless you are qualified by the court as an "expert" witness -- your opinion DOES NOT matter. Only the opinions of expert witnesses matter. The judge will probably not even permit them to be entered into evidence.

You could be pro-active here and hire an attorney to file a motion to squash the release of the emails -- but as the LP's attorney said, it might be fruitless. I am sure you can successfully show the court that you are not an expert witness and the emails will more likely than not be inadmissible -- but it is the potential of your emails to lead them to other discoverable evidence that they will use in any such motion. Discovery rules are very loose -- but just because it is discoverable now, however, does not mean that something will be ultimately admissible in court later.

I think you should give them what they request and continue to maintain that the emails are full of personal opinion and gossip and really are not relevant to the overall lawsuit, but maintian the attitude "if you want them you can have them".   

Then, do yourself a favor -- be much more careful in the future what you write in emails, what you say in voicemails and what you do in videotapes! All of these things can be used against you when you least expect it.

Good Luck. Let me know if you have any follow up questions. Again -- I apologize it took so long, but I wanted to look at Nevada discovery rules, LLP rules, etc. before I finished the asnwer.

Please press the GREEN ACCEPT BUTTON so I will be paid for my time in researching and preparing your answer. A BONUS & FEEDBACK ARE ALWAYS APPRECIATED. THANKS FOR USING JUST ANSWER !!

Picture
Expert: Mary Meaden Esq
Pos. Feedback: 99.6 %
Accepts: 
Answered: 9/5/2009

Attorney

12 years experience in general law: RE, Consumer Prot., Family, Wills & Estates, Emplymnt, Crim Law

+
Read More

Related Legal Questions

  • can I kick my 17 year old son out of the house?
  • do you need to do a cbt training course before driving a ...
  • how can i find who owns a mobile number in the uk
  • How do i get the 50% discount when buying a home?
  • Can i claim Austudy
  • my partner is going to throw me out off his house because i ...
  • the first grand national was run at aintree,england in ...
  • What is a sinking fund



Disclaimer: Information in questions, answers, and other posts on this site ("Posts") comes from individual users, not JustAnswer; JustAnswer is not responsible for Posts. Posts are for general information, are not intended to substitute for informed professional advice (medical, legal, veterinary, financial, etc.), or to establish a professional-client relationship. The site and services are provided "as is" with no warranty or representations by JustAnswer regarding the qualifications of Experts. To see what credentials have been verified by a third-party service, please click on the "Verified" symbol in some Experts' profiles. JustAnswer is not intended or designed for EMERGENCY questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals.
Question List | Become an Expert | Terms of Service | Security & Privacy | About Us
© 2003-2009 JustAnswer Corp.