Copyright infringement represents the fixed expression of an idea. If you don't copy the arrangement of another person's ideas, then you are not violating the copyright. But, if for example, your table of contents effectively duplicated the competitor, then that could be an infringement.

Likewise if the look and feel of the product, taken as a whole, could cause confusion in the marketplace as to the source or affiliation of the product, then that could violate both common law trade dress laws as well as statutory unfair and deceptive trade practices.

Actually the deceptive trade practice laws, which are somewhat different in each State jurisdiction, are probably your greatest obsticle. You cannot make the mistake of trading off the goodwill of another's product, by making it appear to be that person's product.

There are fine grades of gray in determining the sort of infringement that you could be sued for. The objective is to not be sued at all, because it's costly to defend. But, if you get close enough to someone else's product, that person may sue you just to try to force you to pay for your defense -- especially if your competitor is a large organization that can afford the litigation fees, whereas you cannot.

Hope this helps.

Terms and Conditions: By your continuing in this conversation with me, or by your clicking “Accept”, you are expressly agreeing to all of the following: (1) our communication is for entertainment purposes only; (2) you are not consulting me in my professional capacity as an attorney; (3) you do not seek to establish an attorney-client relationship with me, nor do I with you; (4) you will not rely on anything I say and you will obtain appropriate legal counsel via a traditional/office consultation with an attorney licensed to practice in the jurisdiction where your legal issue arises (and you may not use our communication to avoid taxpayer penalties imposed by the U.S. Dept. of Treasury); (5) by communicating with me in this public forum you are irrevocably waiving any right to privacy, confidentiality and attorney-client privilege concerning the matters discussed. You further separately declare that any payment made by you is not consideration for this contract, nor offered for any services rendered by me on your behalf, but rather is made in genuine admiration and respect for my desire to help others. If you do not agree with these terms and conditions, then you must advise me immediately.

I certainly wouldn't name my competitor in the title -- that's for sure.

Without knowing exactly what you're up to, it's impossible for me to conjecture about what you would want to do in any substantive way.

However, the fundamental issue is that an original creative work is "original." If you are intentionally contaminating yourself by trying to copy someone else's product, you may at least want to put somethings of your own into it. Any insight or idea that provides a useful addition to what is already known about the subject, alters the character of the finished product such that it is "yours."

Anyone can make a margarita. But, a margarita with a little mexican beer for fizz isn't a margarita anymore. If you follow my meaning.

And, that is what makes all the difference.

You're asking me to evaluate your creative work, without actually reviewing it. This is a job for an editor, not a lawyer. A review may be better or worse, but it depends on what you're competing with, and how this may differentiate you.

Regardless, I would not use my competitor's name.