Hi XXXXXX:
the petitioner's failure to forward to you (or your attorney) for approval a Findings & Order After Hearing does not ordinarily impact or delay the implementation of the order. The order is made at the hearing; the Findings and Order After Hearing simply memoralizes in legible, complete form what the order was. Because it has so little bearing on the process, it is not uncommon for attorneys to delay or neglect to file these (even though ordered by the court).
The fact that a Findings and Order After Hearing has not been filed will not prevent a party from filing a motion for reconsideration or an appeal. Best of luck.
If this was informative, please remember to click "accept" so I may receive credit for my personal time and knowledge. Thank you.
Attorney
California attorney experienced in family, probate, criminal, and personal injury law.
Interesting. I'm going to shepardize that case. Check in after a day or so.
Hi again:
I'm hoping that the fact that this has "timed out" will not prevent you from seeing this answer. I looked more into it and Rule of Court 232(a) is now Rule of Court 3.1590-3.1591. Check this link for more info:
http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/rules/index.cfm?title=three&linkid=rule3_1590
In my original answer, I referred to a "findings and order after hearing". I'm afraid that I misunderstood your original question, as an F&O pertains to hearings on a law and motion calendar (as opposed to an evidentiary trial--for which a judgment is rendered.)
I am going to need some more information to complete the analysis, but I am showing this question as having "timed out", so before I invest the time in a complete answer, please let me know that you are still there and have not found your answer yet.