JustAnswer > Employment Law
Ask A Question|Register|Login|Help
JustAnswer

Employment Law

Ask an Employment Law Question, Get an Answer ASAP!

Have your own Employment Law question?

4 Lawyers are Online Now
characters left:
Not an Employment Law Question?
Bookmark and Share

Question

I am a federal contractor and have been working on federal contracts for years and the my business legal structure is a sole propriatorship. Recently I have been audited by a Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) auditor who told me that under a FAR clause in the contract (52-216-7(i)) that states that at the time of requesting payments the contractor has paid in cash, check or other form of pyments for the services purchased for the contract work". In other words, the auditor is telling that when I submit my invoices (or public vouchers) I have to pay myself for my direct labor as if I was an employee of the company and if I do not pay mysdlef every payperiod I am NOT in compliance ofthe cluase and the governemnt would try to recover what I charged the governemnet for the years that are Not setteled yet. Although this auditor is forcing to pay myself every pay periods in order for me to get paid on work performed on current contract. For seven years I did not pay myself as an employee

Submitted: 267 days and 11 hours ago.
Category: Employment Law
Value: $40
Status: AWAITING EXPERT REPLY
+
Read More

Optional Information

dayton, Ohio

Already Tried:
I have responded by telling the auditor and its management that a sole propriator I am Not rewquired by law (what Law ?) to pay myself since there is no legal distiniction between the propriator and the propriatorship and their interpretation of the FAR clause ia wrong that and if my company recieves a payment this is in fact a payment for my services charged to the contract. I need help both by expert opions on this Far clause and also if this issue was rasied before or there is a precedent.

Thanks,

XX. XXXXXXXX XXXXX
work XXX-XXX-XXXX
cell XXX-XXX-XXXX

Posted by Anthony Collins 267 days and 5 hours ago.

Info Request

hi. I hope I can help on this matter. I need a little information first.

Specifically, why is it a problem to pay yourself something out of every paycheck?

267 days and 4 hours ago.

Reply

Mr. Collins,

 

I appreciate your help. The problem now is Not looking forward as I am currently doing by paying myself as if I was an employee of the company. The big problem is DCAA and I are trying to settle the incurred cost proposal for FY2005 and later for , 2006, 2007, and part of FY2008. The auditor is stating that because I did Not pay myself every payperiod during FY2005, all of my direct labor cost I billed to the governement for the work I did and for which the governemnt accepted the work and signed the paper work is unsupported and is telling the contracting officer to recover that monies from me since I was not in compliance with FAR 52-216-7(i). Although the auditor recognizes that I did the work and there is a time sheet showing the hours I spent every payperiod. What the auditor also said that because i had draws during FY2005 and the total dollor of these draws are much less than my direct labor cost that I billed the government for. Therfore, the government is at risk of being overbilled.

 

I have used this way of getting draw checks since 1998, and all previous auditors did even bother with something like that and they interpreted the FAR cluase differently and some of those auditors have retired and I have sopken to them on this and they all think is stupid to think that way "referring to the new audito and the new management who concurs with auditor interpretation of the FAR clause.

 

I have searched for a presedent or a prior case like this and found none in the open public domain. In summary, this auditor is asking the contracting office to collect the money for my direct labor cost for the work I had performed and they aknowledge that I did the work day in and day out.

 

Please let my know if you can help, since the only option now I have is if DCAA does Not change its opnion, is to go the Armed Service Board of Contracts or a federal court and argue my case as sole propriator and by definition I was Not Not required to pay myself or at least this was Not an issue, but I need to know if there somebody out there who can help.

 

Thanks,

 

Dr. Mohammed A. Mawid

+
Read More

Related Employment Law Questions

  • employmentlaw
  • I was discharged for time card fraud which is the furthest
  • I work 4 the port authority I took a test to get a promotion
  • My old job called my new job. To make a long story short, I
  • if I was assaulted on the job by another employee on 07/08
  • Can an employer take disciplinary action against me for not
  • I was terminated for a accident after attending my sister's
  • i was injured by a slip and fall accident on the ice at work



Disclaimer: Information in questions, answers, and other posts on this site ("Posts") comes from individual users, not JustAnswer; JustAnswer is not responsible for Posts. Posts are for general information, are not intended to substitute for informed professional advice (medical, legal, veterinary, financial, etc.), or to establish a professional-client relationship. The site and services are provided "as is" with no warranty or representations by JustAnswer regarding the qualifications of Experts. To see what credentials have been verified by a third-party service, please click on the "Verified" symbol in some Experts' profiles. JustAnswer is not intended or designed for EMERGENCY questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals.
Question List | Become an Expert | Terms of Service | Security & Privacy | About Us
© 2003-2009 JustAnswer Corp.