The license agreement is invalid because only A granted it. The operating agreement clearly calls for A and B to consent on all decisions, which would include the agreement to enter into a license agreement with C.
Further, A cannot hold B to the terms of the license agreement because B didn't consent to it.
May be I was not enough clear, the LA stipulate that; early termination: this LA may be termited by A if B or C breach this LA it also says: this LA may be terminated by B if A breach this LA. So why could it be invalid? Even if LA early termination section tell nothing in case of OA breach by B can I cancel the LA because of this OA breach by B?
Operating Agreement (OA) and Licence Agreement(LA) are different documents but I would have never accepted to sign the LA (no minimum sales and royalties) without the OA (A+B need to consent on all decisions). Would you explain more your last sentence, I don't understand. This is very important for me to know if I can cancel the licence because another company asked me the exclusive licence and I would like to answer them ASAP.
Thank you!
C's operating agreement says that A and B must consent to ALL decisions. This would include a decision for C to enter into a license agreement with A. If A and B did not consent to A entering into a license agreement with C, then the license agreement is invalid due to lack of keeping the corporate form (abiding by the operating agreement).
My opinion is that the license agreement with C is invalid because A and B didn't approve it.
Lawyer
Litigation Attorney