Hi.
Your answer is yes because the definition of res judicata and its application is actually more specific than you suggest.
1. To apply the party AGAINST whom it is being used must have been a party to the prior action and had a full and fair opportunity to litigate. (I assume that requirement is satisfied here);
2. The issues must be IDENTICAL...NOT SATISFIED IN YOUR CASE.....THUS YOUR BEST ARGUMENT to preserve action number 2; and
3. The decision in the prior action that is allegedly dispositive of action #2 MUST HAVE BEEN ABSOLUTELY NECESSARILY MADE TO DECIDE ACTION #1. Argue here the "no merits" position on action #1. Good luck.
Rich Licata
Lawyer (JD)
NYC Trial Atty. 30 yrs.- pers. inj., contracts, real estate, criminal, estates, matrimonial.